Hi,
I'm using recent 5-STABLE,
and try to mirror root partition with vinum.
my /boot/loader.conf is below
vinum_load="YES"
vinum.autostart="YES"
But I got following message when boot
...
vinum: loaded
vinum: no drives found
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/vinum/root
setrootbyname failed
ffs_moun
Can you please give an update?
-Bosko
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
> I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as
> soon as possible by the end of the weekend.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0500, Bosko Milekic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Jack L. Stone thusly...
>
> At 06:46 PM 1.30.2005 -0500, Parv wrote:
> >in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >wrote Anton Berezin thusly...
> >>
> >> Unless I hear too many cries "don't do that" (with justification), I
> >> plan to not create any perl symlinks in
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:49:09PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> Be aware that it was a weekend in the US yesterday so the people likely to
> answer your question were probably out having fun, which is why you didn't
> get an answer in 24 hours. Paitience, grasshopper. :)
>
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, And
First, my apologies for sending this to -stable. It's not what I meant
to do.
Both addresses are still active, and someone's looking into it for me.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:54:28PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to change my email ad
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I've been trying to change my email address from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on all my subscriptions at freebsd.org, but the
> Change globally option isn't working.
It may be sending a change confirmation to the old address. If that
address
Be aware that it was a weekend in the US yesterday so the people likely to
answer your question were probably out having fun, which is why you didn't
get an answer in 24 hours. Paitience, grasshopper. :)
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the topic says, I've experien
Hi,
I have some further information that might be of some use, and also
points me to a cause of this bug.
I saw the following information on the system console when I looked at
the screen before rebooting th machine:
Cannot dump. No dump device defined.
Automatic reboot in 15s - press any key to
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:43:59AM -0800, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
>
> Jan 29 14:53:38 mail sshd[699]: login_getclass: unknown class 'root'
> Jan 29 14:53:38 mail last message repeated 3 times
> Jan 29 14:53:38 mail sshd[699]: Accepted publickey for root from 192.168.0.1
> port 60094 ssh2
> Jan
Am Montag, den 31.01.2005, 10:23 -0800 schrieb Sam Leffler:
> This is a known problem in the ath driver in stable that should be fixed
> in current. I expect you are operating 11g. Unfortunately backporting
> the necessary changes is very hard and not something I intend to do.
I've configured
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:53:12AM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
> I have a similar system to yours, but a dual processor. One thing I see is
> that as the days have gone by since the original 5.3-Release, the SMP code
> has had some code changes that have alternately caused crashes or
> compile-
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Juergen Dankoweit wrote:
> In a german documenation I have read that the "-j"-switch should not be
> used because I makes trouble especially on SMP-systems.
This is incorrect.
Kris
pgp1E7A9hT37x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin wrote:
I'm running:
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 31 00:54:51 CET 2005
i386
The card is (Netgear WG311T):
ath0: mem 0xe700-0xe700 irq 9 at device 15.0 on
pci0
After about 73 minutes uptime my PC is busy processing interrupts.
Top shows 90% in IRQ. Everything is s
Hello,
Am Montag, den 31.01.2005, 09:53 -0600 schrieb Billy Newsom:
> Alex Burke wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wasnt quite sure what to call this problem.
> >
> > I am running FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE on a quad Pentium Pro IBM Netfinity
> > 7000 system, and since the GENERIC kernel does not come SMP ena
Hello,
It sounds weird but tcp/ip traffic directed to _local_ interfaces,
and only _local_ interfaces, always cause 50% of packets lost. Of
course there isn't packet filters activated.
I'm running -stable (the last update was this past weekend)
There is another report like this:
http://www.Fre
I'm running:
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 31 00:54:51 CET 2005
i386
The card is (Netgear WG311T):
ath0: mem 0xe700-0xe700 irq 9 at device 15.0 on
pci0
After about 73 minutes uptime my PC is busy processing interrupts.
Top shows 90% in IRQ. Everything is slowed down.
Karl,
On Monday 31 January 2005 18:28, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> your patch works like a charme. One of my guys tested it on 2 boxes and it
I was afraid it would :-\
> works now like it worked before. Speed is great again and we think about
> installing it on 2 production boxes where customers reall
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:14:55AM -0700, Jeff Tyler wrote:
> Can anyone out there in radio land tell me how to create/enable the discard
> socket in FBSD 5.2.1 ? Editing inetd.conf doesn't seem to do it any
> longer. I have a number of 4.8 machines running with working discard
> sockets but ther
Hello Max,
your patch works like a charme. One of my guys tested it on 2 boxes and it
works now like it worked before. Speed is great again and we think about
installing it on 2 production boxes where customers really have problems. Is
it save to patch production boxes with it?
Many thanks,
Ke
Can anyone out there in radio land tell me how to create/enable the discard
socket in FBSD 5.2.1 ? Editing inetd.conf doesn't seem to do it any
longer. I have a number of 4.8 machines running with working discard
sockets but there seems to have been a sea change in 5.x . Does the disc
device pla
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:50:31 -0600, Jack L. Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this were a mere vote of the respondents, the NAYs have it by far.
I like change. Change is good and it keeps us on our toes. However,
some things should not be changed for the sake of change.
If /usr/bin/perl were
Alex Burke wrote:
Hi,
I wasnt quite sure what to call this problem.
I am running FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE on a quad Pentium Pro IBM Netfinity
7000 system, and since the GENERIC kernel does not come SMP enabled I
compiled a kernel with SMP support and drivers for networks card and
SCSI RAID adapter built
Admin @ InterCorner wrote:
> Hi there!
> I have sent this message before (Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:11:40 +0100), but
> without respons. So I'll try again.
> ---
>
> I have gladly installed FreeBSD5 on my laptop to be free from M$ !! :D
> And soon I will install it on my worksation aswell.
>
> Here is (i
Hi,
I wasnt quite sure what to call this problem.
I am running FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE on a quad Pentium Pro IBM Netfinity
7000 system, and since the GENERIC kernel does not come SMP enabled I
compiled a kernel with SMP support and drivers for networks card and
SCSI RAID adapter built into it (not loa
I will also note that this reeks of the "bike shedding" that I hear
about so often on these lists. Quibbling about a symlink doesn't make
much sense to me, at least.
-Erik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
I apologize for the lack of quotes, but since this has dominated the
list, I imagine my message will have appropriate context without.
I started using perl in v5, and only with rare exception have any of
the scripts I've used or written required /usr/local/bin/perl.
/usr/bin/perl seems to be th
At 06:46 PM 1.30.2005 -0500, Parv wrote:
>in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>wrote Anton Berezin thusly...
>>
>> Unless I hear too many cries "don't do that" (with justification), I
>> plan to not create any perl symlinks in /usr/bin in the forthcoming
>> upgrade of both lang/perl5.8 (to 5.8.6) and l
On Sun, 30.01.2005 at 23:24:37 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> The amount of metadata in GBDE is pretty straight forward:
>
> 1.If do not use off-line keyfiles: deduct one sector.
>
> 2.Deduct the key sectors (1 to 4)
>
> 3.Find zone size:
>
> nsect = sectorsize / 1
Hello,
Recently while testing a program on a 5.3-STABLE machine
with dual Athlon MP 2200+ (SMP enabled), i made a mistake
and the program basicaly became a fork() bomb.
It flooded my dmesg and messages with these messages (which is normal):
Jan 29 18:13:20 tormentor kernel: maxproc limit exceeded b
You can, I've done it.
Use Ctrl-P and Ctrl-N for up and down arrows and concentrate hard ;o)
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Torfinn Ingolfsen
Sent: Mon 31/01/2005 09:07
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sparc64 Install 5.3
On Sun, 30 Jan
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:56:13 +
Joel Cant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is it possible to install 5.3 on a sparc64 (Ultra 5) without using
> serial console, I seem to get garbled consoles when I try to install
> via normal screen and keyboard?
The standard (non-serial) console is b
31 matches
Mail list logo
