On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, David Gilbert wrote:
> Gmirror on the fix-it CD appears to be impotent. It appears to have
> only 'help', 'list', 'load' and 'unload' as commands. Not useful.
If you manually load the geom_mirror.ko kernel module it probably gets
useful. Someone pointed out that there's a ha
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
> > > I can't reproduce this on my systems, many of which started at 5.3 and now
> > > build 5-stable. Are you using the system ssh or one you built from ports?
> > >
> > > What is the output of 'ls -l /etc/login.conf*'?
>
> I knew I wasn't hallucina
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing i was curious about is if there is any way to build the
> kernel-module using ATA_STATIC_ID .. (as i used to do in my normal
> kernel-configs)
Ok .. I whacked myself with the proverbial clue-stick .. and
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
Using it without any problems on a few days old 6.0-CURRENT (P2 400 MHz)
I decided to take the plunge and go for the kernel-module-approach.
The only thing i was curious about is if t
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:52:57PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>
> As usual, even if it works on all the HW I have here in the lab, thats by
> far not the same as it works on YOUR system. So use glowes and safety shoes
> and if it breaks I dont want the pieces, but would like to hear the nifty
> d
have a look at this compiling a eggdrop had the same with some other
apps as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
make: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
make: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # cd ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gazzeh # cd eggdr
On Feb 3, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
[ ... ]
Ah, I see, the starting point was actually the reverse assumption
that all systems had /bin/env. Somebody mentioned /sbin/env on
Irix, but I don't know whether that was instead of /usr/bin/env or
in addition to it.
Of course I can alw
Charles Swiger:
> >Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
> >have /bin/env?
>
> Name one such system. [1]
There was a discussion about this a few years ago on comp.unix.shell.
Let's see...
http://tinyurl.com/45zqx
Ah, I see, the starting point was actually the reve
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for some time.
It contains a number of new things, and lacks a few features of the old code.
New items include:
o ATA is now fully newbus'd and split into modules.
This means that on a mo
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:54:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> Ok, so the plan is to MFC the changes into RELENG_5? AFAIK, the ULE code
> in RELENG_5 is still the same as in 5.3-release.
>
That's correct.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from
On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
#! /usr/bin/env perl
Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
have /bin/env?
Name one such system. [1]
Hint: the path to env isn't going to change on a standar
In the last episode (Feb 03), Christian Weisgerber said:
> Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
> > #! /usr/bin/env perl
>
> Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
> have /bin/env?
Are there any system
Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
> #! /usr/bin/env perl
Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
have /bin/env?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Sorry for replying to myself ...
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding to that, the following /bin/sh snippet should do
> (untested!). You have to kill ntpd before.
>
> STEP=100# number of seconds to step forward
> while [ $STEP -gt 0 ]; do
> date -f %s $(( `dat
Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eli K. Breen wrote:
> > I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
> > adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
>
> Not within NTPd itself. You could go with manually stepping the time in 1s
> interv
On Thursday, February 03, 2005 5:57 PM, Eli K. Breen <> unleashed the infinite
monkeys and produced:
> I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
> adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
Not within NTPd itself. You could go with manually steppin
I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
-E-
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 2, 2005, at 16:56, Eli K. Breen wrote:
Lastly this machine is in production and cannot be rebooted.
Stop the NTP daemon and restart i
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 23:34, Dorian Büttner wrote:
> > EVERYBODY: Could you please check if you have a rl(4) driven NIC and
> > check if you experienced a speed degradation as well. Please let me know
> > either way with information about the chipset on your NIC. Thanks!
>
> Hi,
> I'm usi
I'm sorry if I was annoying, i hit send and then saw that i wrote
"Thank", instead of "Thanks" and I thought to be polite
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:30:18 +0100, Ruben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Spamming multiple lists with multiple copies of the same off-topic
> messages is good en
Hi all, I know this is quite off topic for this lists, I was wondering
if you guys will agree to share your anti-spam softwares' spam
lists...
the reason is obvious...
Especially for SpamAssasin...
Thanks,
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
Hi all, I know this is quite off topic for this lists, I was wondering
if you guys will agree to share your anti-spam softwares' spam
lists...
the reason is obvious...
Especially for SpamAssasin...
Thank,
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
EVERYBODY: Could you please check if you have a rl(4) driven NIC and check if
you experienced a speed degradation as well. Please let me know either way
with information about the chipset on your NIC. Thanks!
Hi,
I'm using several 8139 NICs, all of them do good :)
since 5.3 I'm every now and t
Eli K. Breen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running in to an issue where I can't set the clock on a machine
> because the secure level was bumped to 2 before the clock was set.
> Unfortunately adjustments are now clamped to < 1s. Is there any way I
> can force ntpd to adjust the clock by
Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html
Is SCHED_ULE abandoned for 5.x?
I wouldn't go as far as to say that but at the moment there are no plans
to make changes in the default scheduler for 5.4. A
Hello!
Will rcorder on /usr/local/etc/rc.d problem solved before the 5.4
release? Or it will be still run only for /etc/rc.d?
--
With respect,
Boris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
25 matches
Mail list logo
