Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
Currently, it works only under 4.3GB disk.
Same a 1.
No. See kern/61960.
Wrong, ATA mk3 does solve the problem but using the current geomtry
set
Le Samedi 12 fvrier 2005 11:07 +0100, Sren Schmidt a crit :
Anthony Ginepro wrote:
ATA mk3 works fine on my system except two things :
- it seems there's no more atapi-cam support (or it's still WIP ?),
I dont know the status of that, you need to ask the author/maintainer..
- dumps
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:44:01 + Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 23:31, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Can this be true? Are they really looking to kill the FreeBSD
demon? This borders on sacrilege.
From http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/announce.txt
This
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Scott Long wrote:
3 - robustness, 5.3 seems to not handle ddos attacks so well, I
remember on a 4.x machine I could easily take a full 100mbit udp flood
and have the server respond albeit maybe with some lag but it stayed
functional, 5.x seems to crumble under a lot
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 07:08:33PM +0100, Anthony Ginepro wrote:
- Retrying call doadump under a kernel without touching ATA_R_DEBUG,
it worked eventually once and could be canceled. Most of the time, dump
can't be canceled and doesn't progress.
Should I open a PR so that the issue can be
Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
How can I make sure that I have correct/proper owner:group:mode
within the system? It looks to me like install{world,kernel}
fix them but what of /etc? In other words, how can I audit the
permissions in the system in general and /etc in particular?
That depends on what
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:00:50PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
New version that fixes known problems so far etc now available:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
..
As always, enjoy and let me know how it goes...
This does indead fix my panic that I reported
Hmm, I am not a good enough artist to submit the drawing, but perhaps a good
supplement piece would be Lover with all the characteristics of the
traditional Angel. That way the logos would be compatible and easily accepted
as seen
togther on a website or box package or CD-disc, not too close
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Heya..
It might will be easily accepted, but yet, it's still a too advanced logo
to place to resize and such.. Yet, I prefer the old logo and when I see
it, it will always make me (and a LOT of others) to think of FreeBSD.. so
change it as much as you want to, the current one will still be the
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ?
gvinum.
Is gvinum ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
I don't know about RAID5, but 0+1 was working for me in December :)
--
Doug White|
The machine was working fine for 24++hrs. then suddenly this:
--- begin ---
(several)
putc to a clist with no reservered cblocks
ucom0: read start failed
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x4c
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction
Yesterday I've install FreeBSD 5.3 on a machine. After compiling the kernel
with device my, I can connect through the network with that machine.
Everything works fine, but when I try to update the source tree or ftp-ing
to a local machine, the data transfer starts at 10 Kbytes/sec and drops very
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote:
Yesterday I've install FreeBSD 5.3 on a machine. After compiling the kernel
with device my, I can connect through the network with that machine.
Everything works fine, but when I try to update the source tree or ftp-ing
to a local
Oh I would not suggest removing Beastie altogether Jesper! That one is too
well known, but to add a supplementary angel with the feminine would add to the
Package. I am not talking St. Michael here, but rather Lillith, or Mary, or
one of Lot's daughters, or even Dinah (who was raped), or the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08:26AM +1030, Tristan wrote:
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
You need to use gvinum on 5-STABLE and -CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, it would be wise to update to
16 matches
Mail list logo
