-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I switched one hard drive to a CMD 649 ATA100 controller last summer, and I've
had some trouble with it on 4.11-Stable. When I copy a large volume of files
over NFS (800 Megabytes, lets say) the add on controller will stop
recognizing my hard drive.
Josef Karthauser writes:
| On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:00:17PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| >
| > | I have aio.ko loaded and so it isn't that, and it worked a few days ago.
| > | I'm scratching my head and could really do with a clue stick. Will
| > | someone please throw me one?
| >
| > You nee
Peter Jeremy wrote this message on Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 22:56 +1100:
> On Fri, 2005-Mar-04 23:39:36 -0800, Doug White wrote:
> >On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Yoshiaki Kasahara wrote:
> >
> >> In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over
> >> twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'
Thanks for the ideas. It appears this machine has a pretty crippled
BIOS from dell. There's no way to turn off DMA. So, I'm just going to
stick with booting from the floppies for installs as required.
Thanks for the thoughts. At least I've got something to work with if I
run into this on another m
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 5.3 and made a CVSup with the RELENG_5_3 tag.
Now when I run "# make buildworld" I get several errors, and the compiling
stops.
I used CPUTYPE?=k7 when I tryed first time, and CPUTYPE?=i686 when I tryed the
secound time.
For the full log of the complie go to this ur
http://kernel.org/
The Linux Kernel Archives are now powered by a new Compaq ProLiant
DL380 G2 with 1 TB of disk generously provided by Hewlett-Packard.
Many thanks for your support!
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,6607,00.asp
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl380/
On
Thats impressive, do you know what spec that machine is?
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:04:43 +0100, Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:58:08 -0500, Vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > to be fair, I should note that as
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:16:42AM -0500, Edwin Brown wrote:
> It's a Dell XPS Pro 200n system tag 72V98
I seem to recall recently that I needed to disable ATA DMA from
BIOS on a Dell to install 5.3-RELEASE. See if that helps.
> CPU: Pentium Pro 200MHz
> Chipset: Intel 82440FX
> Memory: 128MB
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:46:47AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Josef Karthauser wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >I've downloaded one from http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/, but it doesn't
> >work:
> >
> >genius% /tmp/vmware-any-any-update89/update vmware
> >/usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware
> >Updating /usr/local/lib/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:58:08 -0500, Vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to be fair, I should note that as admin / user of few tens of servers
> running both systems, I can assure you that if your linux "loses
> control" with LA ~ 10, then something is se
True, on that linux machine its more io load than anything else.
But anyway, the problem was caused by fortune -l going into an
infinite loop, and a script running this every 5 minutes.
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:58:08 -0500, Vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On a highly linux machine, you lose all
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:31:19PM +0300, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
+> On the clh0:
+> GEOM_MIRROR: Device data: provider ar0s1g detected.
+> GEOM_MIRROR: Device data: rebuilding provider ar0s1g.
+> GEOM_GATE[1]: Request timeout. ggate0[WRITE(offset=34684698624,
length=16384)]
+> GEOM_GATE[1]: Requ
> On a highly linux machine, you lose all control of the machine past a load of
> about 6 - 10.
to be fair, I should note that as admin / user of few tens of servers
running both systems, I can assure you that if your linux "loses
control" with LA ~ 10, then something is seriously wrong with that
Hi,
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:31:50 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> So I stand by my claim that 1000base-T is clearly more correct than
> 1000baseTX. It would be nice to get this fixed - however, it is a
> minor point and I certainly believe that there are other tasks that
> are more import
Hi, I'd just like to give some credit to the freebsd developers for a
job well done.
A user on our system ( freebsd 5.2.1 smp ) managed with a runaway
script to start up 500 intensive processes, raising the load average
to about 200.
We managed to remotely, over ssh get a somewhat responsive sessi
It's a Dell XPS Pro 200n system tag 72V98
CPU: Pentium Pro 200MHz
Chipset: Intel 82440FX
Memory: 128MB ECC SIMM
BIOS: A06 released 01/08/1998 (the last bios for this computer)
IDE: (MSI DVD drive) (bootable secondary channel master)
(Maxtor 40GB hard disk) (bootable primary channel maste
Josef Karthauser wrote:
[ ... ]
I've downloaded one from http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/, but it doesn't
work:
genius% /tmp/vmware-any-any-update89/update vmware
/usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware
Updating /usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware ... failed
I would consider feeding this update program a full path
Hi Pawel!
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
> After that clh0 is hanging -- keyboard work and I can ping machine, but can't
> login:
> $ ssh -v clh0
> OpenSSH_3.6.1p1 FreeBSD-20030924, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090703f
> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:00:17PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>
> | I have aio.ko loaded and so it isn't that, and it worked a few days ago.
> | I'm scratching my head and could really do with a clue stick. Will
> | someone please throw me one?
>
> You need to run the
> vmware-any-any-upd
Hello,
I configured Microtek ScanMaker3600 succesfully under 5.3-Release. So
far, so good.
In between, I upgraded to -stable and suddenly had to notice that when
starting the prescan, the bulb isn't moving but keeps kind of knocking
at the front of the case.
The scanner uses the sm3600 sane-back
> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD 5.3R support the RAID card MegaRAID SCSI 320-2E
card?
> > I have search amr on
> >
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=amr&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+5.3-
> RELEASE
> >
> > It said support the following:
> > 7 AMI MegaRAID 320-1
> > 7 AMI MegaR
On Fri, 2005-Mar-04 23:39:36 -0800, Doug White wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Yoshiaki Kasahara wrote:
>
>> In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over
>> twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them
>> should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>
> > Hello there.
> >
> > Although the kern/67636 PR was closed before FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE,
> > I'm experiencing exactly the same problem on my FreeBSD
> > 5.3-RELEASE-p5:
>
> > The IEEE is quite clear on the fact that Gigabit Ethernet on Cat5 UTP
> > is called 1000Base-T. See for instance Chapter 34, "Introduction to
> > 1000 Mb/s baseband network", in IEEE 802.3-2002, available from
> >
> > http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.3.html
> >
> > So using 1000ba
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:52:09AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
> > > In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over
> > > twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them
> > > should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and 1000base"T" are
> > > di
> > In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over
> > twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them
> > should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and 1000base"T" are
> > different standard and they are not compatible ("TX" needs CAT6 cable
> > and
Your message has not been delivered because it contains at least one restricted
attachment.
Recipient...: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject.: Re: Its me
Detected Extensions.: scr
If you did not send this message, the most likely cause is a virus on another
computer. The virus has use
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, lhmwzy wrote:
> I have search amr on
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=amr&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+5.3-RELEASE
>
> It said support the following:
> · AMI MegaRAID 320-1
> · AMI MegaRAID 320-2
> · AMI MegaRAID 320-4X
> ·
28 matches
Mail list logo
