El Monday 18 April 2005 01:34, Joe Greco escribió:
> So I'm playing with 5.4-RC2.
>
> I can get the system to PXE boot into a normal full base system
> environment just fine, all the way to multiuser.
>
> However, for system installs, we've historically PXE booted the boot
> floppy images and then
Hi,
I noticed that 'random.ko' module is required by ssh,
especially when running the server sshd. However, the
sshd script in /etc/rc.d does not verify the pressence
of the random.ko module and neither loads it if
necessary. Shouldn't that be added?
I bring this up, since I have observed that t
Thus spake Soren:
: I've just uploaded the latest ATA mkIII patches for releng_5 (and
: releng_5_4 for that matter).
:
: Since this work is now in -current there will only be releng_5 patches
: now and then if there is sufficient interest.
Since the work was done for ATAPICAM, I decided to try t
> RELENG_5 as of Apr 03 21:33
>
> * P4 3.0GHz / 2GB DDR400 RAM
> * Supermicro P4SCi with 2 on-board Intel gige
> * Additional 2-port Intel gige on 64-bit PCI-X
>
> With this many interfaces I have disabled unnecessary devices in the
> BIOS such as USB to reduce IRQ sharing.
Interesting.
I'm usi
Hi, Paul.
Do
sysctl kern.random.sys.harvest.ethernet=0
sysctl kern.random.sys.harvest.interrupt=0
affect to your router's performance?
and, disabling interrupt moderation of em(4) affects the router too?
Please see the previous discussion of interrupt moderation at freebsd-current.
http
> I'm starting to hit errors at 150Kpps.
I'm not sure why you're hitting errors at that speed. But here are a few
suggestions:
> options DEVICE_POLLING #network device mixed
> interrupt-polling handling
> options HZ=1000 #for polling
That's too low. 2000
I'm just a newb, but
(B
(B> > > I had an interesting experience, this morning. The nightly
(B> > > security message from a CVS server machine that runs a version
(B> > > of FreeBSD-4 had arrived, and it claimed that someone who hadn't
(B> > > done any work for us for some considerable time ha
So I'm playing with 5.4-RC2.
I can get the system to PXE boot into a normal full base system environment
just fine, all the way to multiuser.
However, for system installs, we've historically PXE booted the boot floppy
images and then proceeded to do NFS or FTP based installs.
So I set off to do
I'm trying to tune 5.x for maximum router performance, in terms of
packets per second.
I'm starting to hit errors at 150Kpps.
input (em0) output
packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls
1 0 66 1 0178
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 06:55:27AM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
> On Wed 13 Apr 05 19:59, Andrew Reilly
> > This could be avoided, perhaps, with a NetBSD-style backup/diff
> > mechanism, or (incompatibly) with daemontools/multilog-style
> > 64-bit time stamps in the log files. It can be worked-aro
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:34:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I should be more clear - the idle % never goes below 33.3%, spends
> most of its time at 33.3%, and the disks are not even remotely
> saturated. They are 15K SCSI drives and the above is true even when
> there is no apparent disk
I have a MSI RS480M2-IL mainboard (aka MS-7093). According to the specs,
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=639
it has a Realtek ALC658 audio codec (and "Compliance with AC97 v2.3
Spec." as the specs tell). Is there a audio driver for this somewhere?
I'm ru
I should be more clear - the idle % never goes below 33.3%, spends
most of its time at 33.3%, and the disks are not even remotely
saturated. They are 15K SCSI drives and the above is true even when
there is no apparent disk activity. Seems like the idle % is being
calculated incorrectly. I am ju
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:04:28PM -0700, Mike Harding wrote:
>
> On 5.4-RC3, a Dell 2650 with two processors, and hyperthreading turned
> off, a 'make -j4 buildword' never shows idle % less than 33.3, either
> in top or systat. Anybody else see this, or know why it happens?
Your disks are too s
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
By the way, I'm thinking that more frequently hang might related with
large read/write block in mount_nfs -r/-w (I use 8192, original is
1024).
That's certainly possible since non-default settings don't get as much
testing. It would be good to get
Kris Kennaway wrote:
By the way, I'm thinking that more frequently hang might related with
large read/write block in mount_nfs -r/-w (I use 8192, original is 1024).
That's certainly possible since non-default settings don't get as much
testing. It would be good to get a traceback.
Has it even bee
On 5.4-RC3, a Dell 2650 with two processors, and hyperthreading turned
off, a 'make -j4 buildword' never shows idle % less than 33.3, either
in top or systat. Anybody else see this, or know why it happens?
- Mike H.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail
Does any 1-:) have a compiled mysql4*-server with linuxthreads and CFLAGS=-
DUSE_OLD_FUNCTIONS
I went by all the deltas from 5500 up to today ( 5734 ) and always get the same
error
<>
cc -DDBUG_OFF -DUSE_OLD_FUNCTIONS -DUSE_OLD_FUNCTIONS -felide-constructors -fno-
rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-implic
The man page on rc.conf states that "AUTO" can be given to dumpon
variable and it will save the coredump to first suitable swap device. I
tried this today and it doesn't work - during boot, there's a line like
"dumpon: 'AUTO' is not a valid device". By quick grepping in /etc/rc.d
it seems that
On Wed 13 Apr 05 19:59, Andrew Reilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had an interesting experience, this morning. The nightly
> security message from a CVS server machine that runs a version
> of FreeBSD-4 had arrived, and it claimed that someone who hadn't
> done any work for us for some conside
Joseph Koshy wrote:
Here is some of the dmesg - I infer from the Features line
that HTT means this is hyperthread-enabled:
The CPUID feature bit only indicates that the processor is
HTT-"capable". It could still have only one core on chip.
Oh well, you said it in the other words. Didn't r
Joseph Koshy wrote:
Here is some of the dmesg - I infer from the Features line
that HTT means this is hyperthread-enabled:
The CPUID feature bit only indicates that the processor is
HTT-"capable". It could still have only one core on chip.
AFAIK the HTT bit indicates that there are instru
Trying to keep alive some old hardware, I played with an Iomega ZIP
drive on parallel port (vpo), and found the following devices:
/dev/da0 OK
/dev/da0s4OK
/dev/da0s4s4
using a factory formated disk.
This on a RELENG_5 cvsuped on April 10.
One can note that in the message
> Here is some of the dmesg - I infer from the Features line
> that HTT means this is hyperthread-enabled:
The CPUID feature bit only indicates that the processor is
HTT-"capable". It could still have only one core on chip.
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
__
>From what I understand, p4 2.00ghz processors are not HTT capable? I own one
>and its not capable of hyperthreading.
FWIW, the first p4 that supported HTT was the 2.40C I believe.
Regards,
Graham
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Da
Thanks for the prompt response!
> On Sun, 2005-Apr-17 01:50:51 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
>> How do I enable hyperthreading on a Uniprocessor p4 system.
>> I tried my usual SMP kernel options (SMP and APIC) but, of course,
>> the kernel cannot find an APIC. I have set the appropriate option
>> i
On Sun, 2005-Apr-17 01:50:51 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>How do I enable hyperthreading on a Uniprocessor p4 system.
>I tried my usual SMP kernel options (SMP and APIC) but, of course,
>the kernel cannot find an APIC. I have set the appropriate option
>in loader.conf to enable hyperthreading but,
On Thu, 2005-Apr-14 13:04:36 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
[Unexpected failed login reports in security messages]
>
>After much hunting around, and checking perimeter logs, it
>turned out that nothing of the sort had happened. The security
>log script had been fooled by the age of the messages.0.gz
28 matches
Mail list logo
