Hello.
I've recently CVSupped from 5.3-RELEASE to 5.4-STABLE
when I ``make buildkernel'' I get the output like this:
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=athlon-tbird -I/...cut... -mno-mmx
-mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
-ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
From: Viatcheslav Fedorov
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=athlon-tbird
-I/...cut... -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
These are disabled because they cause problems when used in the kernel.
my ``/etc/make.conf'' file:
-
CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird
From: Darren Pilgrim
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=athlon-tbird
-I/...cut... -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
These are disabled because they cause problems when used in the kernel.
my ``/etc/make.conf'' file:
-
CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird
CFLAGS=
On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:21:21 -0400
jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a system update and after that my folding @ home client will not
work without me doing make install in linux_base-8 ports dir. BTW,
linux is already installed from before the update and even after
reinstalling
On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:21:21 -0400
jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a system update and after that my folding @ home client will not
work without me doing make install in linux_base-8 ports dir. BTW,
linux is already installed from before the update and even after
reinstalling
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
##
I tried the same with an other nfs server (using dill as nfs server this
time - system description is in my 1st mail, same mount options like /
mnt/files). And guess what? dill rebooted immediate... dd came never
back,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-24 07:38:57 +0200:
Dear all!
I have graphic card as in subject.
With ati and radeon driver it
makes not so clear picture, looking
out of focus. 5.4, amd64 version.
Does someone have similar behaveour?
Best regards
Does this look like it? (I don't have a
Hello,
I have recently upgraded (via complete install) both our server from
FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE to
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and I got strange problem.
We are using PowerWare 9125 UPS, and PowerWare does not have FreeBSD
version of UPS monitoring software. They have
Linux version which worked very
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi Mohan,
Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
Is this consistently reproducible ?
it is - everytime
I found out that I can reproducible make it work by writing on an other
harddisk.
file:/mnt/files 151368706 109165638 30093572 78% /mnt/files
file:/usr/ports
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
##
I tried the same with an other nfs server (using dill as nfs server this
time - system description is in my 1st mail, same mount options like /
mnt/files). And guess what? dill
On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:34, Igor Robul wrote:
They use UDP for communications.
If I try connect to ls3 (daemon) which is running on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE,
then I get message about timeout from client part (ls3con).
I see UDP packets from client to server with tcpdump on lo0 interface
(with local
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:45:50PM +0200, Sten Spans wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
##
I tried the same with an other nfs server (using dill as nfs server this
time - system description is in my 1st
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I can't really suggest anything except for compating version of linux_base you
are using. It may be worth ktrace'ing the server (use the linux_kdump port to
interpret the result)
Also perhaps you should consider trying to use NUT with the UPS (since it's
open source)
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
This is absolutely known - TCP/nfs has bugs in realigning packets.
Don't use TCP on strong aligned architectures.
Still a pr with a proper backtrace would be nice.
Or does one exist already ?
Not that I know.
I did know exactly when this happens
I had an issue with timeouts and SSH before (5.2 I think and 5.1 before
that). I was able to log in once after a reboot but attamts after the
first timed out. Searching the net told me that AllowUsers was an option
I shouldn't have enabled in sshd_config. Commenting out that line made
all the
Igor Robul wrote:
As you can read from my post NUT does not support this model. I'll try
with different linux_base.
I have tried truss on server process, but could not find anything
helpful :-(. I'll try ktrace.
No luck with linux_base-7 (From FreeBSD-5.2.1 CD). Also I cannot build
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Sten Spans wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
This is absolutely known - TCP/nfs has bugs in realigning packets.
Don't use TCP on strong aligned architectures.
Still a pr with a proper backtrace would be nice.
Or does one exist
I'm having some problems with NFS serving on a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
machine. The FreeBSD machine is the NFS/NIS server for a group of four
Linux clusters. The network archictecture looks like this:
234/24 234/24
Cluster 1 ---
Hey,
I have a panic which I can reproduce quite easily (approx. 25% success)
on a 5.4-STABLE #12: Sun May 8 16:03:04 BST 2005 system. The stack
seems to be corrupt but hopefully I've been able to extract enough
information to help analysis.
Some background:
I have a USB keyboard on UHCI
libthr is experimental and unmaintained..it was removed in 6.0 (well,
Bugger. There goes my only workaround for PR threads/80992!
-pcf.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-23 16:10:03 +0200:
I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
happened to /dev/dsp, and I can no longer play mp3s. A restart would
most probably fix it, but I'd like to
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:09:01AM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Hi,
using the user keyword in pf rules the system panics. I found
this in the errata page:
(31 Oct 2004) When the user/group rule clauses in pf(4) and ipfw(4)
are used, the loader tunable debug.mpsafenet must be set to 0
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:41:05PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
libthr is experimental and unmaintained..it was removed in 6.0 (well,
Bugger. There goes my only workaround for PR threads/80992!
Um, what about use libthr in 6.0 as well? Did you try it and find
that it doesn't work?
Kris
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Hello there,
there is a strange thing FreeBSD 5.3 randomly frogets some of my
users. Sometimes I see in the first column of the ps aux output the
uid number instead of the login name, but next when I run it, there is
the login name. Besides, I tried to chown a
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
Don't edit the /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd files directly, you
get into a lot of trouble. Use vipw or the pw command.
I haven't done that... I always add a user with adduser and delete it
with pw userdel.
Also, please don't crosspost between current and
sergei wrote:
I have the same problem:
After I cvsuped my system from 5.3 to 5.4, ipfilter (compiled in the my
custom kernel) ipnat not start automatically. If I do
/etc/rc.d/ipfilter start /etc/rc.d/ipnat start manually - all works
fine... Lines ipfilner_enable=YES and ipnat_enable=YES
Folks,
We have an up-to date FreeBSD 5.4 Stable server that has suddenly
started experiencing timeouts while reading and writing its 200Gb
Western Digital SATA hard disk. We see at least one read / write
timeout with kernel message every fifteen minutes or so and the box
becomes sluggish while
Hi,
I had a 4.11 box panic today. Followed the example at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html
to get the following info:
FreeBSD miko.bway.net 4.11-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p2 #6: Tue Apr
5 16:49:50 EDT 2005 [EMAIL
This happened during boot when dhclient configured the fxp0 address. This
is on our mostly-5.4 tree with local changes. This is with DEVICE_POLLING
and SMP (we've removed the #error for this case, as -CURRENT). The same
thing happens with em.
I see netisr_poll() takes Giant and then the
On Thursday 26 May 2005 17:45, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:09:01AM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Hi,
using the user keyword in pf rules the system panics. I found
this in the errata page:
(31 Oct 2004) When the user/group rule clauses in pf(4) and ipfw(4)
I am receiving the following error, on a freshly installed 5.4 system on
my laptop, running xorg-6.8.2.
drm0: ATI Radeon RS100 Mobility U1 port 0x9000-0x90ff mem
0xd010-0xd010,0xe000-0xefff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci1
info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0
On Thu, 26 May 2005 20:39, Igor Robul wrote:
As you can read from my post NUT does not support this model. I'll try
Oops sorry, I didn't read it properly :(
I looked at this project on the NUT home page -
http://www.lygre.org/upscode2/
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for
On Thu, 26 May 2005 22:16, Igor Robul wrote:
Igor Robul wrote:
As you can read from my post NUT does not support this model. I'll try
with different linux_base.
I have tried truss on server process, but could not find anything
helpful :-(. I'll try ktrace.
No luck with linux_base-7
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Scott Long wrote:
Again, please don't take the abrupt switch to 6.0 to mean that 5.x is
flawed or that 6.x will also have a short lifespan. The real purpose
of the switch is nothing but positive; it'll keep us focused and prevent
us from overreaching and overextending
Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Scott Long wrote:
Again, please don't take the abrupt switch to 6.0 to mean that 5.x is
flawed or that 6.x will also have a short lifespan. The real purpose
of the switch is nothing but positive; it'll keep us focused and prevent
us from
Francisco Reyes wrote:
So why have a 6.X naming convention to begin with?
Why not just stay in 5.X name wise?
Because 5.x has been declared to be STABLE, and some of the changes in
6.x will require that applications (and especially kernel modules) be
recompiled (which isn't allowed on a stable
FreeBSD 5.3-5.4 and motherboard Asus P4SP-MX hang on reboot. Last message:
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...1 1 1 0 0 done
No buffers busy after final sync
Uptime: 19h20m46s
Shutting down ACPI
Rebooting...
and hang. then hardware reset only (
I tried with/witout ACPI, changed all bios setting.
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE on a new machine,
Celeron + SATA drive, without and problems, include a kernel rebuild to
support a PCI serial card.
But now I wish to change the graphic, beastie, that appears in the boot
menu. I am certainly no expert or even acolyte in forth programming
Malcolm Kay wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE on a new machine,
Celeron + SATA drive, without and problems, include a kernel rebuild to
support a PCI serial card.
But now I wish to change the graphic, beastie, that appears in the boot
menu. I am certainly no expert or even acolyte in
Scott Long wrote:
Malcolm Kay wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE on a new machine,
Celeron + SATA drive, without and problems, include a kernel rebuild to
support a PCI serial card.
But now I wish to change the graphic, beastie, that appears in the
boot menu. I am certainly no
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Oops sorry, I didn't read it properly :(
I looked at this project on the NUT home page -
http://www.lygre.org/upscode2/
Thank you for info. I'll try this as soon as possible, but in general I
need working LanSafe because
there are some Windows servers hooked into
41 matches
Mail list logo
