Re: 5-STABLE cpufreq hotter than est from ports

2005-08-01 Thread Tijl Coosemans
Hmm, the server must have dropped the attachment. Another try... --- sys/kern/kern_cpu.c.origMon Aug 1 14:42:26 2005 +++ sys/kern/kern_cpu.c Mon Aug 1 23:52:06 2005 @@ -650,19 +650,7 @@ CF_MTX_ASSERT(&sc->lock); - TAILQ_FOREACH(search, &sc->all_levels, link) { -

5-STABLE cpufreq hotter than est from ports

2005-08-01 Thread Tijl Coosemans
A couple days ago I updated my system and was excited to see cpufreq and powerd in 5-stable. Since then however I noticed that my laptop temperature is about 5°C higher than with est and estctrl. I found that cpufreq when setting 200MHz for example set the absolute frequency to 1600MHz (max for thi

Re: repeatable crash with 5.4-RELEASE and PAE

2005-08-01 Thread dpk
As seen here: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.stable/browse_thread/thread/ad8029efaa6efe95/8f3269d6819ef0b8?lnk=st&q=panic+vm_pageout+fork_trampoline+fork_exit+freebsd+5.4&rnum=1&hl=en#8f3269d6819ef0b8 If you'd prefer, I can mail this to another list, in case stable isn't appr

X for users slow: you are right! thx

2005-08-01 Thread Eriq
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Monday 01 August 2005 17:34, Eriq wrote: after all of this, I notice that it takes a user about a minute after 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) anyway this doesn't happen when I logon as root and start X. Blackbox is the WM hope this h

Re: FreeBSD stable RELENG_5_4 how-to show after make installworld

2005-08-01 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 8/1/05, Joep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After updating my source (src-all) from fbsd 5.4 RC-3 installed source to > cvsup'ed RELENG_5_4 source, i did all steps in the handbook (makeworld.html) > > Everything seems oke. Only i expected after the new buildkernel and reboot > something else in t

FreeBSD stable RELENG_5_4 how-to show after make installworld

2005-08-01 Thread Joep
After updating my source (src-all) from fbsd 5.4 RC-3 installed source to cvsup'ed RELENG_5_4 source, i did all steps in the handbook (makeworld.html) Everything seems oke. Only i expected after the new buildkernel and reboot something else in the uname output then: FreeBSD dragon 5.4-RELEASE-p6

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Marc Olzheim
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:44:07PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > After fsck telling me it's all ok, when I reboot (even after being up a > > couple of minutes), I still get the same messages now. > > Hmm... Could you please confirm that the final vnode sync has been > completed? Hmm, I'm not sure...

Re: Panic in 6-BETA1 during mount

2005-08-01 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: I gave 6-BETA1 a try on just another machine and got the following panic during mount of an UFS1 filesystem with extended attributes. The machine runs fine with 5.4-STABLE. Could you file a PR on this, and forward me the PR receipt from GNAT

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:48:04PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > Hi, Marc, > > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > > Ok, this time it's worse; Trying to startup single user, gives: > > > > > > WARNING: /

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Matthias Buelow
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Are you using IDE disk driver? If so, having "hw.ata.wc=0" in your >/boot/loader.conf would help the SoftUpdates situation. This won't help in the case when the kernel crashes; this (ugly) workaround only helps at a power loss. mkb. __

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Marc Olzheim
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:48:04PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, Marc, > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > Ok, this time it's worse; Trying to startup single user, gives: > > > > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > > start_init: trying /sbin/init > > WARNING: R

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Xin LI
Hi, Marc, On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Ok, this time it's worse; Trying to startup single user, gives: > > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > start_init: trying /sbin/init > WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck > WARNING: R/W

Re: 6.0-BETA1 LOR^H^H^H panic vm_fault: fault on nofault entry

2005-08-01 Thread Evgueni V. Gavrilov
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > buf = "vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: deadc000", '\0' KK> This is a panic, not a lock order reversal. sorry for muddling up. I've got lot of problems running RELENG_6 on SE7501WV2 based Intel server (5.4 was r

Re: 6.0-BETA1 LOR vm_fault: fault on nofault entry

2005-08-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:51:49AM +0200, Evgueni V. Gavrilov wrote: > kgdb -c /usr/crash/vmcore.25 kernel.debug > [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: > Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation

Re: x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Karel Miklav
You should check your DNS and how long does it take to start X without the WM. I had problems with BlackBox - it took it almost the same time to start as Gnome (around a minute on a 366 MHz notebook). As no BB developer could help me I switched to WMI; it starts in a second on that same box. --

Re: panic: sbflush_locked on 5.4-p5/i386

2005-08-01 Thread Rong-En Fan
On 8/1/05, Alexander S. Usov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In just 2 days of waiting I got it, however it looks that it has fired in a > bit different place. > > (kgdb) bt > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159 > #1 0xc0513899 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:410 > #2 0xc0513ede in pa

Re: x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Yann Golanski
Quoth Andy Sparrow on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:50:36 -0700 > > On Monday 01 August 2005 17:34, Eriq wrote: > > > after all of this, I notice that it takes a user about a minute after > > > 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) > > > anyway this doesn't happen when I logo

Re: background fsck, softupdates & inconsistent state on disk

2005-08-01 Thread Marc Olzheim
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Having enough opportunities to do crash recovery with kern/83375 open > and some of my services not yet moved back to FreeBSD 4, I noticed that > often it crashes just after (or perhaps during) mirroring of a directory > tree. The mirr

Re: x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Andy Sparrow
> On Monday 01 August 2005 17:34, Eriq wrote: > > after all of this, I notice that it takes a user about a minute after > > 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) > > anyway this doesn't happen when I logon as root and start X. Blackbox is > > the WM hope this helps. >

Re: x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Eriq wrote: I notice that it takes a user about a minute after 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) anyway this doesn't happen when I logon as root and start X. Blackbox is the WM hope this helps. hmmm *not* slow as root suggests permissions - maybe on font direc

FreeBSD 6.0 from July 31'st hangs probing atapi

2005-08-01 Thread Claus Guttesen
Hi. Upgraded my 5.4 box vith sources to 6.0 with sources from July 31'st 2005. Did a make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, mergemaster -p, installworld and mergemaster. When it boots it stops at: atapci0: rid 0x20 is memory, requested 4 atapci0: Reserved 0x2 bytes for rid 0x20 type 3

Re: x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 01 August 2005 17:34, Eriq wrote: > after all of this, I notice that it takes a user about a minute after > 'startx' to get into X. Yes I know, but I still like the colors :) > anyway this doesn't happen when I logon as root and start X. Blackbox is > the WM hope this helps. At a wild gu

x for users slow

2005-08-01 Thread Eriq
Hi all, first I would like to say thx to the FreeBSD devel team they have truly done a great job with 5.4! Now I have all my servers running ie. dns (what a headache that was), apache (ok after I got dns working), postgres (the easiest of the bunch), postfix (smooth as always). Most if not all