Hello,
I tried compiling if_ndis after doing the ndiscvt bit.
ndiscvt does not produce ndis_driver_data.h, even when i've
specified the output file as ndis_driver_data.h
Is this a known issue and how do I resolve this?
Jayton
___
Hi, list
I find problem.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:37:32AM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
I use ata soft RAID1 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p5.
Now my raid in degraded status and I can't rebuild it.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:32$ sudo atacontrol list
ATA channel 0:
Master: ad0
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Michael VInce wrote:
I been doing some network benchmarking using netperf and just simple
'fetch' on a new network setup to make sure I am getting the most out
of the router and servers, I thought I would post some results in
case some one can help
(Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list)
Hello,
I'm having difficulties getting a system with an PCI Serial ATA
controller stable under stress. Sorry for the long email, but I'm pretty
confused about the problem, so my description won't be as structured as
I'd have liked.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 06:20:59PM -0700, Danny Howard wrote:
Yeah just for anyone inclined to puzzle this one ...
I pored through the system manual on the way home. Apparently there are
TWO SATA controllers on the MB. It would appear that by default, the
Marvell controller is used,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:52:00 -0400
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2005, at 7:57 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
The *ONLY* question is: will I need to *recompile* all installed
ports if I go from 5.4 to 6.0 release?
No, the kernel has COMPAT_FREEBSD5 and COMPAT_FREEBSD4 by
Michael VInce wrote:
I reinstalled the netperf to make sure its the latest.
I have also decided to upgrade Server-C (the i386 5.4 box) to 6.0RC1 and
noticed it gave a large improvement of network performance with a SMP
kernel.
As with the network setup ( A --- B --- C ) with server B
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:10:46 +0200, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:52:00 -0400
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2005, at 7:57 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
The *ONLY* question is: will I need to *recompile* all installed
ports if I go from 5.4
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:10:46 +0200, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:52:00 -0400
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2005, at 7:57 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
The *ONLY* question is:
(Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list)
Update: I tested with an i810-based mainboard (Celeron 1GHz, RTL8139
ethernet, Promise SATAII 150 TX4 controller, 3 SATA disks in RAID 5,
FreeBSD 6.0-RC1). It remained stable for two hours. I suspect this is
because it has far less
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:30:48AM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
(Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list)
Update: I tested with an i810-based mainboard (Celeron 1GHz, RTL8139
ethernet, Promise SATAII 150 TX4 controller, 3 SATA disks in RAID 5,
FreeBSD 6.0-RC1). It
(Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list)
* Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-20 06:15]:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:30:48AM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
Since this is a completely different mainboard, it seems clearly a
software issue to me. The built-in ICH6
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 21:15, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:30:48AM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
(Please CC me in replies as I'm not a subscriber of this list)
Update: I tested with an i810-based mainboard (Celeron 1GHz, RTL8139
ethernet, Promise SATAII 150
13 matches
Mail list logo
