Hi,
I recently upgrade the FreeBSD from 5.4-Stable to 6.0 RC1.
The FreeBSD run on the VMWare GSX 3.2 with LSI Logic SCSI Adapter.
the root was mounting from ufs:da0s1a
When I upgrade to 6.0. the FreeBSD can't mount from ufs:da0s1a
It work fine on 5.4-Stable.
the problem seems cause by the GEOM
I have found that ImageMagick writes to (and often fills up) /var/tmp...my
system becomes sluggish,
dies, reboots.
The solution I have used is to 1) create a /usr/tmp, 2) remove /var/tmp , 3)
make a symbolic link
between /usr/tmp and /var/tmp.
Perhaps ImageMagick could be patched to use a /usr/
I'm happy to hear that many bugs were fixed. :)
But speedtouch usb modem still doesn't work with betas and last rc1.
I submitted this some month ago:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=usb/83504
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Carl Makin wrote:
I've been playing with some GIS software and 32Mb TIFF images. Running
ImageMagick's "convert" utility under my normal user login to convert the
image to gif or jpeg blows away the system every time. No panic seen on the
console and no core dump found,
Hi all,
I tried FreeBSD 6.0 RC1 whic hworked fine besides that when booting
after the message
acd2: DVDR at ata3-master DUMA33
it took a minute or so to show the next message.
No I synced the sources and build a new kernel in order to e.g. try out
cdrecord which requires atapicam.
But now I c
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:59, Michael A. Koerber wrote:
> I have found that ImageMagick writes to (and often fills up) /var/tmp...my
> system becomes sluggish, dies, reboots.
Your system shouldn't reboot - it is probably panicing for some reason and it
would be good to know why.
Can you enable crash
On 10/27/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
> that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to 6.0-RELEASE. Everyone
> that we have talked to has applauded the stability and functionality of
> the system, s
Sorry for cross posting - with 6.0 so near, I wasn't sure which list to
send this too. I'm not subscribed to -current, so please cc me if the
conversation is moved there.
I just cvsup'd RELENG_6_0 and upgraded by 6.0-RC1 install this morning,
eager to see if WPA with ndis0 would now work. Th
Michael A. Koerber wrote:
> I have found that ImageMagick writes to (and often
> fills up) /var/tmp...my system becomes sluggish,
> dies, reboots.
>
> The solution I have used is to 1) create a /usr/tmp,
> 2) remove /var/tmp , 3) make a symbolic link
> between /usr/tmp and /var/tmp.
>
> Perhaps I
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
Yes, this is most annoying. I haven't gotten around to submitting a
ports PR complaining about /etc/rc.d/amavisd -- it's so obvious I
figured it must have been intentional, but I can't figure out how it
makes sense organizationally for a port
> Sorry for cross posting - with 6.0 so near, I wasn't sure which list to
> send this too. I'm not subscribed to -current, so please cc me if the
> conversation is moved there.
>
> I just cvsup'd RELENG_6_0 and upgraded by 6.0-RC1 install this morning,
> eager to see if WPA with ndis0 would no
Bill Paul wrote:
The problem is that the connection is actually on channel 11, not
channel 1, and its using WPA.
Is this a known issue?
for now I thought people would be more interested
in actually having WPA and WPA2 actually work, and wouldn't mind so
much that ifconfig didn't always repo
Rob wrote:
> Michael A. Koerber wrote:
>
>>I have found that ImageMagick writes to (and often
>>fills up) /var/tmp...my system becomes sluggish,
>>dies, reboots.
>>
>>The solution I have used is to 1) create a /usr/tmp,
>>2) remove /var/tmp , 3) make a symbolic link
>>between /usr/tmp and /var/tm
Felipe openglx wrote:
On 10/27/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to 6.0-RELEASE. Everyone
that we have talked to has applauded the stability and functionality o
Carl Makin wrote:
> John Pettitt wrote:
>
>> Carl Makin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Morning All,
>>>
>>> the interface would just go dead. Nothing in ifconfig or syslog or
>>> dmesg would indicate a problem, but nothing would go in or out. The
>>> only way to fix it was reboot.
>>>
>>
>> What sort
On 10/28/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something that
> FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something that we
> work on as part of the OS.
That's odd, because X11 always worked on that machine, on any linux
distro
Felipe openglx wrote:
On 10/28/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something that
FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something that we
work on as part of the OS.
That's odd, because X11 always worked on that
On Friday 28 October 2005 12:06 pm, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
> Felipe openglx wrote:
> >On 10/28/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something
> >> that FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something
> >> that we work on as
Hello all,
I have a box that has 4.11 on it and is running IRCD and apache.
The box is a 133mhz Pentium with 128MB of RAM. My problem is the box
is sucking bandwidth like crazy even though there are very few
connections and I have no idea why. I have another box with similar
specs and it doe
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:19, Matt Smith wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a box that has 4.11 on it and is running IRCD and apache.
> The box is a 133mhz Pentium with 128MB of RAM. My problem is the box
> is sucking bandwidth like crazy even though there are very few
> connections and I have n
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05, James Long wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:05:23 +0930
> > > From: "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: RFC: proposed patch for
> > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c
> > >
> > > > The command I use most is wicontrol -L
> > >
> > > Tr
Hi,
I just cvsuped the entire source for 5.4 stable
earlier today. I'm running AMD64. When I make
buildworld I get:
cc -m32 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387
-DCOMPAT_32BIT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include
-L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32
-B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -O2 -
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:36:31PM -0700, Tom Shafron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just cvsuped the entire source for 5.4 stable
> earlier today. I'm running AMD64. When I make
> buildworld I get:
>
> cc -m32 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387
> -DCOMPAT_32BIT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59, James Long wrote:
> > > # ifconfig ath0 list scan
> > > ifconfig: list: bad value
> > > #
> >
> > Er weird..
> > Is this in 6.0 or 5.x?
>
> FreeBSD t21.museum.rain.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 24
> 12:49:5 5 PDT 2005
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i
Well just working on installing Freebsd 5.4 on a Toshiba Tecra M3.
The problem I have run into is that it hangs during the loading the
kernel up. It hangs right after seeing uhci. FreeBSD 6.0 can get past
it, but decided to whack the MBR in the proccess even when told not
to mess with it.
I was wo
Hello,
I seem to have a problem serving files with
lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
with -1 and errno "Operation not supported",
but i can't find this error in the documented errors
on the manpage.
Forcing lighttpd to not use sendfile fi
> Hello,
>
> I seem to have a problem serving files with
> lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
> Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
> with -1 and errno "Operation not supported",
> but i can't find this error in the documented errors
> on the manpage.
> Forcing lighttpd to n
David G. Lawrence wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>I seem to have a problem serving files with
>>lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
>>Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
>>with -1 and errno "Operation not supported",
>>but i can't find this error in the documented errors
>>on the manpage
On 10/29/05, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Was that working X11 X.Org or XFree86? Older releases contains
> > XFree86 and 6.0 contains X.Org. You can find both as a FreeBSD port
> > under x11-servers category. Give XFree86 a try, maybe it is better
> > for You.
>
> Or xorg-server-snap,
29 matches
Mail list logo
