On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:22:09PM -0800, Pete Slagle wrote:
> >>I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> >>'DEFAULTS':
> >>
> >>device isa
> >>
> >>device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> >>device io # I
Hi all!
Since the amount of files goes up,
there is a chance to mess something
with the best in mind. Personaly, I
like simple style of making new
kernel. Defaults? OK if works well,
without complaints for people, who
need nothing more than necessary.
What's about "compat" options for
clean instal
On 10/30/05, Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have raised this issue in the past, but no one responded.
>
> Did you submit a PR?
>
> Bryan
No I didn't. There was no response so I figured maybe I was the only
one affected.
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:08:35 -0500
Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well just working on installing Freebsd 5.4 on a Toshiba Tecra M3.
> The problem I have run into is that it hangs during the loading the
> kernel up. It hangs right after seeing uhci. FreeBSD 6.0 can get
> past it, but de
> I said:
> >
> > DHCP configuration - for some reason my machine didn't acquire a
> > default route on boot, but rerunning the dhclient script after
> > boot caused the interface to be set up again successfully. I
> > haven't looked into this further yet, I'll repost if it is a
>
I said:
>
> DHCP configuration - for some reason my machine didn't acquire a
> default route on boot, but rerunning the dhclient script after
> boot caused the interface to be set up again successfully. I
> haven't looked into this further yet, I'll repost if it is a
>
> Just a few words on that point ... after some use of mergemaster, it
> seems to me that a big part of /etc have to be update blindly for most
> users (things in rc.d, and some other places where there's files that
> haven't to changed or that are system script that most users won't
> modify.)
>
--On måndag, oktober 17, 2005 18.18.56 -0400 Brian Fundakowski Feldman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:04:58PM +0400, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:12:26AM +1000, Carl Makin wrote:
> I've been playing with some GIS software and 32Mb TIFF images. Running
> ImageMagick's "convert" utility under my normal user login to convert
> the image to gif or jpeg blows away the system every time. No panic
> seen on the cons
I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
'DEFAULTS':
device isa
device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
device io # I/O device
Why?
What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized
'GEN
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> Dear colleagues,
DM>
DM> after several hangs once our router drops to debugger with the following:
DM>
DM> any hints?
Source found: almost dead CPU cooler. Strange that mbmon did not found raised
temperature.
Sorry for the noise.
Sincerely,
This thread seems to relate to the same problem in
dfbsd :
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-03/msg00101.html
I think that this should be fixed, the man page did not mentions
EOPNOTSUPP and this can lead to further confusion because it seems
that HP-UX for example sets errno to
Niki Denev wrote:
>
>
> I get the same behaviour also with 6.0-RC1 (cvsupped an hour ago)
>
Ok,
In this awful piece of code created for testing purposes
if i set FILETOSEND to local file it works ok,
but if the file is located on smbfs sendfile returns "Operation
not supported".
If this is not
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:04 +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> In that case, how do we remove io or mem so that they get in as kld at boot
> time ?
With the nodevice directive.
--
Massimo.run();
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Dear colleagues,
after several hangs once our router drops to debugger with the following:
any hints?
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck ---
+-le 30/10/2005 11:53 +0100, Massimo Lusetti écrivait :
| On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 11:36 +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
|
|> Hi,
|>
|> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
|> 'DEFAULTS':
|>
|> device isa
|>
|> device mem # Memory and ke
on 30.10.2005 11:36 Uhr Cristiano Deana said the following:
Hi,
I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
'DEFAULTS':
device isa
device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
device io # I/O device
Why?
What
Thank you , Kris.
> It's included by DEFAULT.
> The point of a DEFAULTS file is that to contain things that are used
> by DEFAULT, including those which are mandatory.
As I thought, but how? I didn't see any "include" in GENERIC or any
modify in Makefile.
> > I think it should be written in 'UP
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 11:36 +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> 'DEFAULTS':
>
> device isa
>
> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> device io # I/O devi
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> 'DEFAULTS':
>
> device isa
>
> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> device io # I/
Hi,
I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
'DEFAULTS':
device isa
device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
device io # I/O device
Why?
What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized
Hi,
I need to mount an iPod mini formatted in HFS+. I don't believe this
file system is supported in 5.4 Stable, at least not on a standard
kernel. I get :
# ls /sbin/mount_*
/sbin/mount_cd9660 /sbin/mount_msdosfs /sbin/mount_std
/sbin/mount_devfs /sbin/mount_nfs /sbin/mo
22 matches
Mail list logo
