Errors after upgrading to new portupgrade

2006-01-02 Thread Jack Raats
Hi, Running the new portupgrade 2.0.0,1 gives the following errors: orac# portupgrade -Na [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 13945 port entries found

Errors after upgrading portupgrade

2006-01-02 Thread Jack Raats
Hi, Running the new portupgrade 2.0.0,1 gives the following errors: orac# portupgrade -Na [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 13945 port entries found

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread Mitch \(Bitblock\)
From: Mitch \(Bitblock\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:15:57 -0800 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current- stable.ht ml#STABLE) references ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ - which

Re: Swapfile problem in 6?

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
Attempting to catch up with my backlog of unread email, only 12K unread messages to go ... On 24 Nov, Rob wrote: I have cvsup'ed the sources to STABLE as of Nov. 23rd 2005. After recompiling/installing world and debug-kernel, I again get a kernel deadlock when using swapfile:

Re: Swapfile problem in 6?

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 17 Nov, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Rob wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I commented on it elsewhere in this thread. Do you mean your comment on the swap_pager error: Quote: AFAICT that is just a trigger-happy timer..it's

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread David Adam
Mitch, On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Mitch (Bitblock) wrote: From: Mitch \(Bitblock\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:15:57 -0800 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current- stable.ht ml#STABLE) references

graid3 lost disk - array still fails

2006-01-02 Thread Tommi Lätti
A few hours ago, my customers graid3 array crashed due one hard-drive loss and it's unable to recover. The data is easily replaceable so no loss of sleep for that but I'd really like to hear some ideas what happened, if possible. Since this was 'do-it-cheaply', we got 3x160G seagates, all old

Where ahve all the sockets gone?

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Oberman
6.0-Stable as of 12/11. % netstat -anf inet % netstat -anf inet6 % I have connections to several systems and a few daemons listening, both INET and INET6. Since my last upgrade, I can't see them with netstat. Has anyone else seen this? (For the record, I DO see lots of UNIX sockets if I don't

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread Mitch \(Bitblock\)
Hey David! [Mitch says:] The handbook document should point to ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ instead (I think there's a problem report with a patch under review). Yes, the -STABLE branch exists. That's how you would patch a 6.0-RELEASE system: using cvsup(1) to follow the

Re: Errors after upgrading to new portupgrade

2006-01-02 Thread William Denton
On 2 January 2006, Jack Raats wrote: /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:89:in `': failed to allocate memory (NoMemoryError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:89:in `trace' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:723:in `do_upgrade' from

Re: Recurring problem: processes block accessing UFS file system

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Nov, Tor Egge wrote: Thanks Kris, these are exactly the clues I needed. Since the deadlock during a snapshot is fairly easy to reproduce, I did so and collected this information below. alltrace didn't work as I expected (didn't produce a trace), so I traced each pid associated

Re: Swapfile problem in 6?

2006-01-02 Thread Lars Kristiansen
Attempting to catch up with my backlog of unread email, only 12K unread messages to go ... On 24 Nov, Rob wrote: I have cvsup'ed the sources to STABLE as of Nov. 23rd 2005. After recompiling/installing world and debug-kernel, I again get a kernel deadlock when using swapfile:

Re: Recurring problem: processes block accessing UFS file system

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Nov, Tor Egge wrote: Thanks Kris, these are exactly the clues I needed. Since the deadlock during a snapshot is fairly easy to reproduce, I did so and collected this information below. alltrace didn't work as I expected (didn't produce a trace), so I traced each pid associated

Re: Recurring problem: processes block accessing UFS file system

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 22 Nov, Greg Rivers wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: It may not be the same problem. You should also try to obtain a trace when snapshots are not implicated. Agreed. I'll do so at the first opportunity. 'show lockedvnods' is very important for diagnosing

Re: FreeBSD unstable on Dell 1750 using SMP?

2006-01-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Nov, Dan Charrois wrote: This is encouraging - it's the first I've heard of someone who has found a way to trigger the problem on demand. The problems I was experiencing were on a dual Xeon with HTT enabled as well.Perhaps someone out there who knows much more about the inner

6.0-STABLE Panic

2006-01-02 Thread Dikshie
Dear All, my 6.0-STABLE always panic when make buildworld heres the dump: lapi# kgdb kernel.debug vmcore.0 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB