Chuck Swiger wrote:
It would also be good if dhcpd would reassign the same IP to the same machine
(if the IP is not otherwise being used) if there was a prior lease matching the
client asking for a new lease, and not just when a client is trying to renew an
existing lease.
I'm way outside the
On Saturday 04 February 2006 11:25, David W. Hankins wrote:
> I thought that was why FreeBSD moved away from ISC DHCP to OpenBSD
> dhclient?
>
> Actually, I guess I never did understand that move. Certainly, no
> one ever explained it to me without a great deal of "wifi" handwaving.
I was under t
David W. Hankins wrote this message on Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 16:55 -0800:
> There's no one I think I'm supposed to be talking to about
> architectural plans like these at FreeBSD. So all these plans
Well, you could always check the FreeBSD cvs repository to see who
imported dhclient (a hint, it's
David W. Hankins wrote:
> Marcin Jessa wrote:
>> Son't be silly. What if you dont know what IP you will get from the
>> lease? That's what working implementation of DHCP is for...
>
> I thought that was why FreeBSD moved away from ISC DHCP to OpenBSD
> dhclient?
>
> Actually, I guess I never did
From: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700
> Warner Losh wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
> > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006
Hiya!
>>
>> I've got the same problem with an A7N8X-X (athlon 2000+) motherboard and
>> 6-STABLE (Build Feb, 2 2006).
>> booting with kernel.debug says nothing, seems to be hardware hang but
>> doesn't happend with linux nor OpenBSD. Didn't tried 5.3 yet.
>> Hang after detection of ATA devices (
Or you can unsubscribe from FreeBSD Mailing List Site
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Viernes, 03 de Febrero de 2006 11:48 p.m.
Para: Luis-Angola SNet
CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Asunto: Re: mailing list
Tell
On Saturday 04 February 2006 00:36, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> What if you take your laptop to an university to hold a lecture and you
> are unable to run dhcp? None of the students know of the IPs avaliable
> in the range.
> Some systems disallow traffic unless your MAC-address is registered in
> their
On Saturday 04 February 2006 00:51, tiksin wrote:
> I compile python-ldap 2.0.10 on FEEBSD6.0 with openldap 2.3.11 (seveur and
> client ).
> When i import the python ldap module i have the following error message:
>
> ImportError: libldap_r-2.3.so.1 Undefined symbol "pthread_attr_destroy"
Looks li
Warner Losh wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs.
Hmm, yes, apparently it only use
Tell you how to unsubscribe
you need to send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Please take off this mailing list at once!!! I dunno what this is all
> about but i do not wish to receive any more mails, hundreds of them every
> day, that makes no sense whatsoever to me.
>
> T
> kalin mintchev wrote:
try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client
and edit your rc.conf:
dhclient_program="/usr/local/sbin/dhclient"
dhclient_flags= see manual for isc-dhcp3-client
>>>
>>> ok.. this sounds reasonable...
>>> but how do i tell the dhcp server what number am i assig
I have a Crucial 1GB USB 2.0 Gizmo memory stick. It does work, but not
without its problems.
When I insert it into the USB port, the kernel spits out a large number
of bad looking messages - I'll copy them below. /dev/da0 is created,
but no /dev/da0s1 is created. If I then do "mount_msdos /
Marcin Jessa wrote:
> Son't be silly. What if you dont know what IP you will get from the
> lease? That's what working implementation of DHCP is for...
I thought that was why FreeBSD moved away from ISC DHCP to OpenBSD
dhclient?
Actually, I guess I never did understand that move. Certainly, no
o
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:05:44PM -0800, John T. Yocum wrote:
> I've been having a same sort of issue that others have reported. After
> dhclient has been running for a random length of time, it suddenly
> starts consuming a large amount of CPU. Unfortunately for me, the
> longest it tends to r
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 17:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why would you want to do that ?
>
I wanted to do some kernel debugging of an application under 4.11 and I
had a freebsd6 box already setup.
In order to do the serial port debugging method, I wanted to be able to
debug the kernel I comp
Martin wrote:
There is a quite nasty bug in tr(1) when using
de_DE.ISO8859-1(5) locale.
Try this please:
unsetenv LC_ALL
setenv LANG de_DE.ISO8859-1
echo v | tr a-z A-Z
I'm getting "W" as result. Shouldn't it be "V"?
(Unexpected behavior explained elsewhere in the thread.)
The correct way to
Why would you want to do that ?
> Just curious if I should even bother trying to compile 4.11's kernel
> under Release 6.
>
> Just tried and couldn't successfully 'config MYKERNEL_CONF':
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] config MIRALINK.serial_console
> config: ../compile/MIRALINK.serial_console: No such file
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >tr uses the collation sequence when expanding ranges, so the real
> >problem is that the lowercase range "s-w" expands to "s??tuvw", and
> >the uppercase range "S-W" expands to "STUVW", which is a smaller
>> try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client
>> and edit your rc.conf:
>> dhclient_program="/usr/local/sbin/dhclient"
>> dhclient_flags= see manual for isc-dhcp3-client
>
> ok.. this sounds reasonable...
> but how do i tell the dhcp server what number am i assigning to fxp0?
> now ifconfig sh
Dan Nelson wrote:
tr uses the collation sequence when expanding ranges, so the real
problem is that the lowercase range "s-w" expands to "sßtuúùûüvw", and
the uppercase range "S-W" expands to "STUÚÙÛÜVW", which is a smaller
set.
An alternative would be to use "tr stuvw STUVW" or "tr stuúùûüvw
ST
In the last episode (Feb 03), Martin said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >See the "tr" manpage, especially the EXAMPLES and COMPATIBILITY
> >sections.
>
> From tr(1) COMPATIBILITY:
>
> "Since tr now obeys the locale's collation order, this idiom may not
> produce correct results when there is not a 1:1 m
On Fri, 2006-Feb-03 11:50:54 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
>Just curious if I should even bother trying to compile 4.11's kernel
>under Release 6.
>
>Just tried and couldn't successfully 'config MYKERNEL_CONF':
Do you want to give some more detail. The 6.0 config won't work on a
4.11 config file. Som
Dan Nelson wrote:
See the "tr" manpage, especially the EXAMPLES and COMPATIBILITY
sections.
From tr(1) COMPATIBILITY:
"Since tr now obeys the locale's collation order, this idiom
may not produce correct results when there is not a 1:1 mapping
between lower and upper case"
Does this mean that
In the last episode (Feb 03), Martin said:
> There is a quite nasty bug in tr(1) when using de_DE.ISO8859-1(5)
> locale.
>
> Try this please:
> unsetenv LC_ALL
> setenv LANG de_DE.ISO8859-1
> echo v | tr a-z A-Z
>
> I'm getting "W" as result. Shouldn't it be "V"?
See the "tr" manpage, especially
Just curious if I should even bother trying to compile 4.11's kernel
under Release 6.
Just tried and couldn't successfully 'config MYKERNEL_CONF':
[EMAIL PROTECTED] config MIRALINK.serial_console
config: ../compile/MIRALINK.serial_console: No such file or directory
Sean Bruno
_
Hi,
There is a quite nasty bug in tr(1) when using
de_DE.ISO8859-1(5) locale.
Try this please:
unsetenv LC_ALL
setenv LANG de_DE.ISO8859-1
echo v | tr a-z A-Z
I'm getting "W" as result. Shouldn't it be "V"?
Produced on (probably more versions affected):
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 19 01:07
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Warner Losh wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, O. Hartmann wrote:
Bruce Evans schrieb:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Now take a look into , where this function should be
declared. Nothing, I can not find this routine, it seems to be 'not
available' on my FreeBSD6.1-PRERELEASE AMD64 (no 32Bit compatibility)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs.
>
> Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100
> Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs,
> > 512MByte memory), but not o
Hi.
>From time to time I have to connect to the Net through USB
Qualcomm CDMA modem which really cannot be called "reliable piece of
hardware (tm)". It often experiences spontaneous shutoffs and sometimes
it just stops communicating on the port for a while and decides there
are better things to do
this is an old issue which i already brougth up some 5-6
years ago but probably got forgotten...
/sbin/init is installed with very restrictive permissions:
rizzo2# ls -l /sbin/init
-r-x-- 1 root wheel 474696 Feb 2 12:27 /sbin/init
rizzo2#
which is terribly annoyin
> try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client
> and edit your rc.conf:
> dhclient_program="/usr/local/sbin/dhclient"
> dhclient_flags= see manual for isc-dhcp3-client
ok.. this sounds reasonable...
but how do i tell the dhcp server what number am i assigning to fxp0?
now ifconfig shows exactly
Hi,
I compile python-ldap 2.0.10 on FEEBSD6.0 with openldap 2.3.11 (seveur and
client ).
When i import the python ldap module i have the following error message:
ImportError: libldap_r-2.3.so.1 Undefined symbol "pthread_attr_destroy"
But on my desktop (Ubuntu), compilation and import work fine.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:39:19 +0100
Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Marcin Jessa wrote on 2006-02-03 at 14:33:55 CET:
> > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:02:41 +0100
> > Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > kalin mintchev wrote on 2006-02-03 at
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:02:41 +0100
Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> kalin mintchev wrote on 2006-02-03 at 13:55:01 CET:
> > > 2006/2/3, make stuff up <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >> thank you... does that mean back to 5.4 for now?
> > >
> > > Try install /usr/ports/ne
try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client
and edit your rc.conf:
dhclient_program="/usr/local/sbin/dhclient"
dhclient_flags= see manual for isc-dhcp3-client
2006/2/3, Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi there,
>
> kalin mintchev wrote on 2006-02-03 at 13:55:01 CET:
> > > 2006/2/3, make s
> 2006/2/3, make stuff up <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> thank you... does that mean back to 5.4 for now?
>
> Try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client/
without a connection?
>
> --
> Cris, member of G.U.F.I
> Italian FreeBSD User Group
> http://www.gufi.org/
> ___
2006/2/3, make stuff up <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> thank you... does that mean back to 5.4 for now?
Try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client/
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:09:43AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>
> DS>Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't
> DS>> trigger it.
> DS>
> DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline ke
>
> There was a change in DHCP between FreeBSD 5.x and 6.
> I noticed the same behaviour with a couple of hw broadband routers.
> AFAIR this was also reported back to the list, still no fix was
> provided.
thank you... does that mean back to 5.4 for now?
this is the only system i have on the
On 2/3/06, Geoffroy Desvernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got the same problem with an A7N8X-X (athlon 2000+) motherboard and
> 6-STABLE (Build Feb, 2 2006).
>
> booting with kernel.debug says nothing, seems to be hardware hang but
> doesn't happend with linux nor OpenBSD. Didn't tried 5.3 ye
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 06:10:18 -0500 (EST)
"make stuff up" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all... again...
>
> i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited
> about it.
>
> i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying
> dhclient i get:
>
> DHCPDISCOVER on fx
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla
> > from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now
> > with Xft support and all.
>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:20:06AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 00:04, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > How come it is so impossible to make mozilla work with Xft?
> >
> > I uninstalled everything that involves X on my home machine,
> > running 4.8-RC, deleted what was left in /u
How come it is so impossible to make mozilla work with Xft?
I uninstalled everything that involves X on my home machine,
running 4.8-RC, deleted what was left in /usr/X11R6 and remaining
graphical stuff in /usr/local. Recompiled from scratch. But still
mozilla dies after having worked on disk for
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:19:41AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> >Dear colleagues,
> >
> >What is the correct way to upgrade FreeBSD from 3.3-R to 4.x?
>
> Wow ... that's a bit of a leap. I expect you're going to have
> problems going that far easily.
>
> >using recommend
Is this a known behavoiur that when you attach a USB
Memory Stick, the machine freezes? If so, any clues on
how to make it not to?
Details: 4.8-RC a few days old. An "all SCSI" system.
Can it have something to do with the USB stick trying
to attach to already occupied devices or ?
The same St
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:03:35AM -0500, Scott Renna wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I had a question in regards to this post about sendmail. I noticed the
> same problem on my system:
How come this is so hard. Just do a grep for sendmail
in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and you get:
2$ grep sendmail /etc/d
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:16:28PM -0500, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote:
> Nice, thanks for the works! Do anyone know how it goes with the Nvidia
> driver?
Yes works on my regular desktop at work. Running 4.7-STABLE with
nvidia in it.
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
> >I've committed the update of XFree86 to 4
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:55:53PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:52, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories
> > connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore
> > patches don't apply clean.
> >
> > Use
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:24:31PM -0800, Greg Smith wrote:
> Gunnar,
>
> Maybe running of pccardd along with the memory setting of Kevin will do
> the job.
I just rebooted with the following setting:
hw.cbb.start_memory="0x2000"
And now my Netgear card is detected as wi0 Will try to configu
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote:
> Gunnar,
>
> Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf
> or wherever it might go in 5.0.
>
> It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD.
Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable="YES" in /etc
cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories
connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore
patches don't apply clean.
Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0
--
Gunnar Flygt, SR
___
freebsd-stable@
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > > > I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT
> > > > box
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > > > I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT
> > > > box
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla
> from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now
> with Xft support and all.
Again I have to reply to my own answer. The good thing is still
good, bu
I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT
box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2
to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked
straight "out of the box", if you can say so after a
portupgrade XFree86
What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer
b
I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla
from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now
with Xft support and all.
--
Gunnar Flygt, SR
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
I found when reading the /var/log/XFree86.0.log
(WW) RADEON(0): [dri] Some DRI features disabled because of version mismatch.
[dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but 1.3.1 or later is preferred.
--
Gunnar Flygt, SR
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:17:43AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 10:22, Fred Clift wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > As for non-i386 -Server:
> > >
> > > I have an almost finished set of diffs for ia64 to build and
> >
> > See the alpha lis
I've got the same problem with an A7N8X-X (athlon 2000+) motherboard and
6-STABLE (Build Feb, 2 2006).
booting with kernel.debug says nothing, seems to be hardware hang but
doesn't happend with linux nor OpenBSD. Didn't tried 5.3 yet.
Hang after detection of ATA devices (floppy's light turns on,
hi all... again...
i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited about
it.
i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying dhclient i
get:
DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5
this trys 6 times then this shows up:
No DHCPOFFERS receive
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs.
Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
I have read that in 5.x fxp driver did not work with PAE, but,
as i see, fxp is not in 'nodevice' section of PAE kernel config anymore.
Is it okay now to use fpx in PAE kernel?
Also, is twe driver very stable in PAE?
I have a web server with 6 gigs of RAM and would like to use them all.
Thank
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:14:27AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS.
>
> The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to
> generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly f
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS.
The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to
generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly faster) in
some cases.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
DS>Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS>> The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs,
DS>> 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the
DS>> crosscompiler that is different?
DS>
DS>Dif
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs,
> 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the
> crosscompiler that is different?
Different CFLAGS perhaps?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:37:32AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
A> >This is fixed in 6.0-RELEASE. In 5.x the true values can be obtained
A> >via 'vmstat -z'.
A>
A> Which number from output of vmstat -z indicates mbufs? I don't see it
A> there.
vmstat -z | grep Mbuf
MbufClust: 2048,25600,
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers.
%netstat -m
4294481198 mbufs in use
What does this mean? Do i really have 4294481198 mbufs in use?
How is this possible?
This is fixed in 6.0-RELEAS
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
A> Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers.
A>
A> %netstat -m
A>
A> 4294481198 mbufs in use
A> 4294662679/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max)
A> 0/694/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
A> 3463545 KBytes allo
On 2/2/06, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a known problem with 6.0R, see the 2005/11/16 entry in
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/errata.html.
>
> You should either upgrade to 6-STABLE or you can apply this patch to fix
> the problem.
Arrgh, I forgot to check the errata
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
DS>Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't
DS>> trigger it.
DS>
DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier,
DS>the extensive inlining not only breaks
76 matches
Mail list logo
