On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:20:44PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:05:13PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> > Why does GCC produce faster code using "-march=pentium2
> > -mtune=pentium4" on a Pentium 4 chip versus plain -march=pentium4?
> >
> > Try it...
> >
> > CPUTYPE=pe
El sistema de seguridad de Ges Seguros rechazo el envio a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
por contener un archivo adjunto de formato no admitido:
MS Windows PE Intel 80386 GUI executable not relocatable
Si tiene alguna duda, contacte con el administrador de su sistema.
---
> # fdisk /dev/ad0
> *** Working on device /dev/ad0 ***
> parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
> cylinders=155061 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)
>
> Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1
> parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
> cyl
I'm using the radeon driver and thus suspend kills the system. I'm
trying to get a 'lame' suspend by sending xdm a -HUP signal and killing
the drm and radeon modules with 'kldunload -f'. However kldunload
ignores the '-f' option on my system. The output is always the same
(with and without '-f"):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:18:21PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I'm missing something here ... I've looked in /etc/defaults/devfs.conf, and
> found that ruleset 4 is what I want for a jail ... so, I issue:
>
> devfs -m /vm/.t19/dev ruleset 4
>
On 2006.03.27 23:18:21 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I'm missing something here ... I've looked in /etc/defaults/devfs.conf,
> and found that ruleset 4 is what I want for a jail ... so, I issue:
>
> devfs -m /vm/.t19/dev ruleset 4
I can't remember the details right now (other than it's eas
On Monday 27 March 2006 23:08, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > Jo?o
> >
> > This is not quite true; I am running 2 systems with the sk driver. One
> > of them is a dual core athlon64, and it's network connection is indeed
> > flawed unless I change debug.mpsafenet to 0. The other machine is a
>
On Sat, 2006-Mar-25 21:39:27 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>What happens if you simulate read-ahead yourself? Have your main
>program fork and the child access pages slightly ahead of the parent
>but do nothing else.
I suspect something like this may be the best approach for your application.
My su
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Albert Shih wrote:
> > Le 27/03/2006 ? 07:46:04-0300, JoaoBR a ?crit
>
> >
> >>is your card in polling mode ?
> >
> >
> > Well I don't known what's that mean. I just look the ifconfig's man...I
> > just use default config, and I
On Monday 27 March 2006 21:21, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> > IMO it would make sense to be replaced by Pyuns driver because the
> > original is not functional
> >
> > kind of strange getting a new release with a known not functional driver
> >
> > João
>
> This is not quite true; I am running 2 syste
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:10, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-Mar-28 06:00:23 +1000, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> >On Tuesday 28 March 2006 04:08, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 17:58:32 +1000, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> >> >Having some problem with Xorg-6.9.0 and the radeon or ati
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 07:40, Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> That page points out that you need to re-compile your kernel
> with options DEVICE_POLLING, the OP should make sure that he
> does that, too.
>
> > > I don't understand : You think is better to put my card in polling mode
> > > or not ?
> >
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:49 +0530, Joseph Koshy wrote:
> > # fdisk /dev/ad0
> > *** Working on device /dev/ad0 ***
> > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
> > cylinders=155061 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)
> >
> > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions no
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:47:54AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> nve does not run polling mode but dc does
Hmm. Neither it does. I could have sworn that I saw it listed
in the polling(4) man page. Oh, well. It wasn't working
anyway, and I haven't tried to use it yet: the dc is working
with polling on
- Original Message -
From: sue lilley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:08 PM
Subject: Fw: page fault rel 6.0 freebsd
Not sure if the to address is valid so forwarding it to the mailto on the
freebsd website
- Original Message -
From: sue lilley
To: [EM
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 04:08, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:21:28AM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> > On Monday 27 March 2006 23:48, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 March 2006 15:51, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> >
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote..
> On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > and sparc64(SMP) and I never see above errors. The only issue known to
> > me is occasional watchdog timeout error which I really want to fix. But
> > the watchdog timeout error is hard to reproduc
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 12:40, you wrote:
> probably you do not have the traffic to make the box crash or less then
> 1/2GB of RAM in use
The box has 1GB RAM. Traffic is approx. 2-3Mbit/s.
>
> in fact the problem does not happen on UP machines, only some times a
> device timeout which only ocas
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the correct list, maybe this belongs -bugs.
Anyway, I took a look at 6.1-PRE to see if the nasty NIS bugs are
still present, and I believe they are. See PR bin/73422 for more
information.
I present the following four patches and I hope you'll consider making
them par
On 3/27/06, Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for
> some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for
> usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those
> two trees would be available somewhere on some
I have realized that the old 'rtc.ko' ( real time clock?) module used by
vmware caused the panic.
Now evething seems to be working just fine. Thank you for the advice.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:16:14PM +0300, belesBSD wrote:
Hi,
I have builded world and kernel with n
I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine.
I have this line on inetd.conf:
ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root/usr/libexec/ftp-proxy
ftp-proxy -n
And this lines on pf.conf:
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port ftp-proxy
pass in quick
вівторок 28 березень 2006 05:27, Peter Jeremy написав:
> I'd suggest that each mmap be capable of storing several hundred msec of
> data as a minumum (maybe 10MB input and 5MB output, preferably more).
> Synchronisation can be done by writing tokens into pipes shared with the
> mmap's, optimised by
On Tue, 2006-Mar-28 21:36:26 +1000, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
>I used "X -configure" which chose the ati driver which also doesn't work.
Odd because both the dmesg and Xorg log says you have a ATI Radeon
VE/7000 QY, which isn't on the ATI driver's supported list.
>I've attached a Xorg log with the
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 11:38, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
>
> I can't really tell if the performance is impaired by mpsafenet=0, because
> the box is mostly busy doing userland stuff. Typical traffic looks like
> this:
>
>
> I'm going to test the new driver to see if I can disable mpsafenet. To be
> s
--- Renato Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine.
>
> I have this line on inetd.conf:
>
> ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root/usr/libexec/ftp-proxy
>
> ftp-proxy -n
>
> And this lines on pf.conf:
>
> rdr on $int_if proto
Peter wrote:
> --- Renato Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine.
>>
>> I have this line on inetd.conf:
>>
>> ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root/usr/libexec/ftp-proxy
>>
>> ftp-proxy -n
>>
>> And this lines on pf.conf:
>>
>>
Using 6.0 release latest security branch.
netstat -m
69/576/645 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
65/261/326/33792 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
0/38/8704 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
147K/666K/813K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
0 requests for sfbufs denied
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 04:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-Mar-28 21:36:26 +1000, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> >I used "X -configure" which chose the ati driver which also doesn't work.
>
> Odd because both the dmesg and Xorg log says you have a ATI Radeon
> VE/7000 QY, which isn't on the A
Axel,
Hi, I was reading your post in regards to installing FreeBSD on the
BladeCenter that you made to freebsd-stable. I've also been trying
installing FreeBSD on the BladeCenter. During my installs, it hangs
during the SCSI disk probes (Waiting for SCSI disks to settle). That
should onl
Tom Samplonius wrote:
Axel,
Hi, I was reading your post in regards to installing FreeBSD on the
BladeCenter that you made to freebsd-stable. I've also been trying
installing FreeBSD on the BladeCenter. During my installs, it hangs
during the SCSI disk probes (Waiting for SCSI disks to sett
The problem is that I'm not running from rc.conf, not using a shell script
;(
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Scott Robbins wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:18:21PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm missing something here ... I've looked in /etc/defaul
In various manpages, su and pam_unix for example, reference the manpage
pam(8) but there is no pam(8) there is a pam(3)... this sys was JUST upgraded
hours ago, and I have asked other people... and they all have the same
problem... so either its missing, or its a false reference.
--
b1tt3r -- Y
Whats with the blogger thing? I see signed messages through here all the
time.. it doesnt spit that at them...
--
b1tt3r -- You know, like sugar?
Sam Stein
Computer TeXnician/Programmer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:33:53PM -0600, Sam Stein wrote:
> Whats with the blogger thing? I see signed messages through here all the
> time.. it doesnt spit that at them...
Someone on this list is feeding their subscription to blogger.com,
which is then wrongly spitting out errors to the original
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Guy Helmer wrote:
Tom Samplonius wrote:
Axel,
Hi, I was reading your post in regards to installing FreeBSD on the
BladeCenter that you made to freebsd-stable. I've also been trying
installing FreeBSD on the BladeCenter. During my installs, it hangs during
the SCSI d
Hi,
Does anyone know if the Quantum SATA DLT-V4 tape drives will work in
6-stable (or 6.1)?
I'm looking at model number BHBAM-BR. See:
http://www.quantum.com/Products/TapeDrives/DLT/DLTV4/Index.aspx
The only reference I can find using Google is a post on an OpenSolaris
forum saying that it
Sam Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In various manpages, su and pam_unix for example, reference the manpage
> pam(8) but there is no pam(8) there is a pam(3)... this sys was JUST upgraded
> hours ago, and I have asked other people... and they all have the same
> problem... so either its missing
38 matches
Mail list logo
