hi all
i've got this issue:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96729
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
i'd like to look into it, because i'm not experience with the
development of the freebsd (or any other) kernel, yet i'd like
to create a temporary solution. it would
hi all
i've got this issue:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96729
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
i'd like to look into it, because i'm not experience with the
development of the freebsd (or any other) kernel, yet i'd like
to create a temporary solution. it would
Hi!
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:03:16PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
after manually adding it, and re-running installworld, I noticed that (after
delete-old) the second 'mergemaster' has a group temporary file with 'audit'
in it (as
it wanted to remove mine and add its own - I'd used 70
.
Items affecting the ports and packages system can be found in
/usr/ports/UPDATING. Please read that file before running
portupgrade.
20060506:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Jack
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Last night I updated on of my machines from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.1-RC. As far as
I understand, I followed the instructions correctly - in particular:
boot -s
# fsck -p
# mount -u /
# mount -a
# adjkerntz -i
# cd /usr/src
# mergemaster -p
# make
the COMMON ITEMS: section later in the file.
Items affecting the ports and packages system can be found in
/usr/ports/UPDATING. Please read that file before running portupgrade.
20060506:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
The CVS tags are in the process of going down, but once the tags are laid down
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:04:59AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
The CVS tags are in the process of going down, but once the tags are laid
down the release still has to be built, assembled, and sanity-checked.
This takes a few days, assuming no last minute showstopping discoveries.
With any
of file for further details. For commonly
done items, please see the COMMON ITEMS: section later in the file.
Items affecting the ports and packages system can be found in
/usr/ports/UPDATING. Please read that file before running
portupgrade.
20060506:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
WBR
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:04:59AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
The CVS tags are in the process of going down, but once the tags are laid
down the release still has to be built, assembled, and sanity-checked.
This takes a few days, assuming no last
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:12:41AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
I think it would be premature to assume that they are finalized, but you
can find the current draft in the source tree in src/release/doc. In
general, we don't hook up release notes to
Hello!
I have just installed FreeBSD/i386 6.1-RC2 on a AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+,
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe Motherboard and 2 GB RAM. The Motherboard has two
Ethernet-Ports for 1000BaseT which dmesg gives out as:
skc0: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem 0xd1004000-
0xd1007fff irq 17 at
Michael Gerhards wrote:
Hello!
I have just installed FreeBSD/i386 6.1-RC2 on a AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+,
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe Motherboard and 2 GB RAM. The Motherboard has two
Ethernet-Ports for 1000BaseT which dmesg gives out as:
skc0: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem
Artyom Viklenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed FreeBSD/i386 6.1-RC2 on a AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+,
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe Motherboard and 2 GB RAM. The Motherboard has two
Ethernet-Ports for 1000BaseT which dmesg gives out as:
skc0: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem
On Sat, 6 May 2006 09:36:31 +0930
Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 09:33, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Can you get a back trace? ie enable crash dumps and do it again, or
transcribe, or photograph the screen as it panics if you are local.
Unfortunately I
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 06:18:59PM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006 09:36:31 +0930
Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 09:33, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Can you get a back trace? ie enable crash dumps and do it again, or
transcribe, or
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 09:33, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Can you get a back trace? ie enable crash dumps and do it again, or
transcribe, or photograph the screen as it panics if you are local.
Unfortunately I cannot reproduce it now. Doesn't the old
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
i see, thanks. there is some XML(or similar) file. should i have to
build the whole world to get a human-readable form, or is there some
other, less painful way for it?
The release notes are built automatically as part of
hello,
a while ago someone reported the same problem I had been seeing, that
dhclient starts taking up 100% CPU. it's probably something comcast
is doing.
I couldn't get the requested coredump then, if I set kern.corefile
to /tmp/%N.core and kill -QUIT it, it doesn't seem to produce a
On 05/05/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:27 PM 05/05/2006, Mike Jakubik wrote:
This quota/nve problem sure stirred things up, i guess im partly to
blame, but anyway i think that it all boils down to is this; FreeBSD
users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Chris wrote:
are snapshots a default setting?
In case people want to avoid using snapshots, here are the uses I'm currently
aware of in the base system:
- Background file system check uses snapshots. This can be disabled by using
background_fsck=NO in /etc/rc.conf.
On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make Jakubik wrote:
FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I fully
understand that this is a volunteer project [...]
I'm sorry, but the former
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Peter Losher wrote:
I have an install base of machines running MIT Krb5 (which have their
own com_err implementation), and I have always used NO_KERBEROS=true so
that the integrated Heimdal stuff wouldn't be built during a buildworld.
However libcom_err does, and that
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has not been
created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during
mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group.
The default action is to do nothing, so its
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
hi all
i've got this issue:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96729
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
i'd like to look into it, because i'm not experience with the
development of the freebsd (or any other) kernel, yet
On Sat, 2006-May-06 21:26:51 +0100, Chris wrote:
1 - it does increase stability if the extra time is spent fixing bugs
and testing the fixes.
It always winds up not working this way. People won't test the early
beta releases and when the final release candidates appear, people
suddenly insist
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Chris wrote:
are snapshots a default setting?
In case people want to avoid using snapshots, here are the uses I'm
currently aware of in the base system:
- Background file system check uses snapshots.
Hello to all,
I noticed such a problem:
I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
pf_enable=YES
pflogd_enable=YES
but when the system boots i test with:
pfctl -vs rules
and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no problem..
then i made:
rc_debug=YES
and the first thing
Doug White wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has not been
created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during
mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group.
The default action is to
On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
I noticed such a problem:
I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
pf_enable=YES
pflogd_enable=YES
but when the system boots i test with:
pfctl -vs rules
and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no problem..
then
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Chris wrote:
are snapshots a default setting?
In case people want to avoid using snapshots, here are the uses I'm
currently aware of in the base system:
- Background file system check uses snapshots. This can be disabled by
using
Chris wrote:
On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make Jakubik wrote:
FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I fully
understand that this is a volunteer project [...]
I'm sorry, but
g'day ...
I've recently started having an issue on my desktop that I've been kinda
hounding the cable provider about, but, from their end, they see
absolutely no issues ... so I figured I'd see if there was maybe something
happening within the OS itself ...
Here is the issue ...
32 matches
Mail list logo
