Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
>>
>> martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate
On Sat, 2006-Sep-23 09:09:38 +0200, martinko wrote:
>Kent Stewart wrote:
>> On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
>>>
>>> martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
>> Please submit a ful
Hello!
I've noticed a strange interdependency between FS mount options (RELENG_6
as of 20-Aug). I'm using "rw,sync" options in my /etc/fstab for the root
partition. W/o NFS export of it, 'mount' output looks good:
/dev/ad0s4a on / (ufs, local, synchronous)
However, when I export this partiti
Hi,
I just experienced a panic after playing around with bluetooth. After a
fresh boot I decided to try and unload the ng_ubt module and noted all
the dependencies. So I tried to unload all of them in turn a few times.
Some seemed to unload but kldstat showed many of them still and it seemed
like I
On 23 Sep 21:56, Callum Gibson wrote:
}like I wasn't going to be able to unload them all. Then I pressed
}the wlan/bluetooth toggle button and had the panic.
}
}I'm synced to 6_RELENG as at 20th September. Apparently (null) below
}is where "ubt" should be.
I neglected to mention I'm running FreeB
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:19:03 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just comitted a fix to syscalls.master and regenerated the remaining
system call files, which should correct the auditctl: Invalid Argument
error being returned b
I have a Dell XPS 700 Pentium D 3.6 Dual Core with 2 gigs RAM, 2 250 GB
SATA drives, a TSST Corp TS-H553A DVD burner and a Phillips DROM 6316
DVD-ROM.
The system sees the hard drives but not the DVD drives. I have device
atapicam compiled in the kernel.
What can I do to enable the drives?
Hi Sam!
Sam> I do not understand what "bad connectivity" means.
I'm not a native speaker so I've apparently used a wrong term, I apologize
for the confusion. Instead I should've probably said "low signal strength".
Sam> If you provide
Sam> information like the mac+phy revs for the c
On Sep 3, 2006, at 14:13 , Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I'm about to get a "new" server... In this case what I'm looking at
is a Gigabyte GA-K8NSC mobo with nForce3 250Gb chipset, and a AMD
64 3200+ Venice S939.
Does anyone have any experience with FreeBSD (6.1) and this mobo/
chipset? Does th
Hi,
I upgraded my FreeBSD from 6.1-RELEASE-p6
on my HP Compaq nx8220 to 6.2-PRERELEASE
as of two days ago.
With 6.1-RELEASE-p6 and xorg from 6.1-RELEASE
installed, I just activated glx and dri in xorg.conf
which worked without bigger problems, but after
upgrading to 6.2-PRERELEASE the screen goes
Hi,
I have noticed that top reports strange values for CPU utilization. The
problem is that while it reports this for overall utilization...
CPU states: 40.8% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 4.5% interrupt, 50.9% idle
...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
On Sat, 2006-Sep-23 21:56:45 +1000, Callum Gibson wrote:
>I just experienced a panic after playing around with bluetooth. After a
>fresh boot I decided to try and unload the ng_ubt module and noted all
>the dependencies. So I tried to unload all of them in turn a few times.
>Some seemed to unload b
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200
Václav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU
> COMMAND
My guess is that you're seeing weighted CPU time and wan
Hi,
Scott Long wrote:
> > I can't see any mention of virtual address alignment in the
> bus_dma man
> > page. Can it take care of virtual address alignment? If so, how?
> >
>
> busdma makes no guarantees on virtual addresses.
Thanks for the confirmation. I assume this is also true for cont
Stefan Esser wrote:
> I've been the co-author of the ncr SCSI driver, on which sym is based
> (though not that particular code fragment). Since I know the structure
> and principals of the driver (and since I have and know the docs up to
> the 53c875, possibly also the 53c895), I'd probably be in a
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote, On 23.9.2006 23:42:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200
> Václav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> ...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
>>
>> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU
>> CO
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200, Václav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that top reports strange values for CPU utilization. The
problem is that while it reports this for overall utilization...
CPU states: 40.8% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 4.5% interrupt, 50.9%
On Sunday 24 September 2006 01:50, Ronald Klop wrote:
> I see the same and it is always with threaded applications (libpthread).
> If you use libthr (see libmap.conf) it shows a lot better.
I also found that vlc performs better with libthr than with libpthread; with
libthr I am able to view a mul
Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> Hi Sam!
>
> Sam> I do not understand what "bad connectivity" means.
>
> I'm not a native speaker so I've apparently used a wrong term, I apologize
> for the confusion. Instead I should've probably said "low signal strength".
>
> Sam> If you provide
> Sam> infor
martinko wrote:
> Kent Stewart wrote:
>> On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
>>>
>>> martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preproces
hello dominic. sorry for not updating. actually i have solve that matter.
1. changing the HDD from western digital to maxtor
2. change the BIOS DMA transfer inside the bios.
and now it works and my freebsd running fine. thank you for your email.
see ya
cybersans
Go into the BIOS, disable BI
Hi all!
For some time I have problem with
wireless card.
At the beginning, it looks, and it
is, battery issue. But now, on power
cord, simptoms are the same. The
"ral" card just loses connection to
the access point. After seconds or
minutes, connection comes back. On
and off. Laptop has 6.1 on it,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
DP> I've noticed a strange interdependency between FS mount options (RELENG_6
DP> as of 20-Aug). I'm using "rw,sync" options in my /etc/fstab for the root
DP> partition. W/o NFS export of it, 'mount' output looks good:
DP>
DP> /dev/ad0s4a on / (u
23 matches
Mail list logo
