Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-16 Thread Trond Endrestøl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP port 995, leaving inetd unable to start a

Re: FBSD 6.2-PRE: todays cvsupdate break kernel build

2006-10-16 Thread O. Hartmann
Sam Leffler wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64: awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atapicam/../../../conf/kmod_syms.awk atapicam.ko export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % atapicam.ko objcopy --strip-debug atapicam.ko ===> ath (

Re: can't compile mico app

2006-10-16 Thread Chris H.
Greetings, ... Quoting KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: it's not finding CORBA.h .h:121: error: `CORBA' has not been declared account.h:121: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `Long' with no type account.h:121: error: `Long' declared as a `virtual' field account.h:121: error: expected `;

Re: c-ares and IPv6

2006-10-16 Thread Duane Whitty
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:31:53PM -0500, Don Wilde wrote: > Hey, folks - > > I know you're all busy with release work, but can somebody point me to how > to get things like gnupg to compile? curl says both c-ares and IPv6 cannot > coexist, but c-ares is not installed and I've built kernels both

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do I need to start a project? Matt Dillon is > already doing it. > > One thing that Matt has proved is that IQ isn't > cumulative. Because hes doing on his own what an > entire team of FreeBSD "engineers" can't

c-ares and IPv6

2006-10-16 Thread Don Wilde
Hey, folks - I know you're all busy with release work, but can somebody point me to how to get things like gnupg to compile? curl says both c-ares and IPv6 cannot coexist, but c-ares is not installed and I've built kernels both with and without IPv6 support. Whazzup? curl does not seem to be the

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread RoBeRT B
If you see/grep Danial Thom in FreeBSD related, consider this: http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/88q1/13785.8.html http://amasci.com/weird/flamer.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_war My personal fav' is the first link... How do we know that 'DT' even exists? Hmmm. DT - S, go awa

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Dan
On Monday 16 October 2006 18:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: > In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new > SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan > Ermilov. However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware > that it is to support. The problem i

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Andrew Reilly
$ sudo pciconf -l | fgrep 0x0c0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111458 chip=0x005210de rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00 $ sudo pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x20 1c01 $ sudo pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x24 1c41 $ sudo pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x50 1c01 $ sudo pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x54 1c41 This

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Duane Whitty
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:06:26PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: > >Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE? > >I use native seamonkey-1.0.5 + linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_6 + > linux-flashplugin-7.0r68, and

can't compile mico app

2006-10-16 Thread KAYVEN RIESE
it's not finding CORBA.h .h:121: error: `CORBA' has not been declared account.h:121: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `Long' with no type account.h:121: error: `Long' declared as a `virtual' field account.h:121: error: expected `;' before "balance" account.h:133: error: `CORBA' has not been

Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability

2006-10-16 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 16 October 2006 12:46, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 10/13/06, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 13 October 2006 07:31, Buki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I searched the archives and web a little but found many different > > > opinions on stability/usability of using make

Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability

2006-10-16 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 16 October 2006 15:33, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 1:47 PM -0700 10/13/06, Kent Stewart wrote: > >On Friday 13 October 2006 07:31, Buki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I searched the archives and web a little but found many different > >> opinions on stability/usability of using make -j# w

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Danial Thom
--- Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, > Michael Butler wrote: > > For everyone's benefit then, please feel free > to submit your patches > > along with your technical analysis. > > I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then > he can tell all

Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability

2006-10-16 Thread Garance A Drosehn
At 1:47 PM -0700 10/13/06, Kent Stewart wrote: On Friday 13 October 2006 07:31, Buki wrote: Hi, I searched the archives and web a little but found many different opinions on stability/usability of using make -j# with buildworld (and buildkernel). So I am asking if it is a good idea to use

nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk

2006-10-16 Thread Rong-en Fan
Hi, Yesterday, I saw my all my nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk. I saw the same thing some time ago. I break into ddb and do a 'alltrace': http://www.rafan.org/FreeBSD/ufs/20061017.txt The system in question is running 6-STABLE Sep 20. It's an i386 SMP box. When all nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:15:26 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new > SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan Ermilov. > However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware that it is to > support. The probl

Re: FBSD 6.2-PRE: todays cvsupdate break kernel build

2006-10-16 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
O. Hartmann wrote: > Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD > 6.2-PRE/AMD64: > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atapicam/../../../conf/kmod_syms.awk > atapicam.ko export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % atapicam.ko > objcopy --strip-debug atapicam.ko > ===> ath (all) > m

Re: FBSD 6.2-PRE: todays cvsupdate break kernel build

2006-10-16 Thread Sam Leffler
O. Hartmann wrote: > Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD > 6.2-PRE/AMD64: > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atapicam/../../../conf/kmod_syms.awk > atapicam.ko export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % atapicam.ko > objcopy --strip-debug atapicam.ko > ===> ath (all) > m

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:14:47PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > At least the above plug-ins (java/diablo-jdk15 and www/mozplugger) > installs under X11BASE although the new www/firefox revision expects > them to be under LOCALBASE. FYI, I have just submitted patches for the above under por

Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability

2006-10-16 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 10/13/06, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 13 October 2006 07:31, Buki wrote: > Hi, > > I searched the archives and web a little but found many different > opinions on stability/usability of using make -j# with buildworld > (and buildkernel). > > So I am asking if it is a good

Re: php4 update

2006-10-16 Thread Juraj Lutter
On 10/16/06, Simon L. Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Long version: check in the newsgroups or mailing lists archives... :) portaudit -Fda prior to portupgrade will do the trick. otis -- Sincerely yours, Juraj Lutter ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Andrew Degtiariov
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:15:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > $ pciconf -l | fgrep 0x0c0500 > and also note chip field value, it should match 00(64|84|d4|e4|52)10de. > E.g.: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:1:class=0x0c0500 card=0x1c02147b chip=0x006410de > rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00 > > 2. read values in B

FBSD 6.2-PRE: todays cvsupdate break kernel build

2006-10-16 Thread O. Hartmann
Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64: awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atapicam/../../../conf/kmod_syms.awk atapicam.ko export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % atapicam.ko objcopy --strip-debug atapicam.ko ===> ath (all) make: don't know how to make /usr/sr

Re: php4 update

2006-10-16 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.10.16 20:02:05 +0200, Olivier Mueller wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 10:25 -0700, Dominik Zalewski wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on i386. I wanted to upgrade my php to > > latest version 4.4.4_1 cause of security update. > > When running portupgrade php4 I go

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:15:26 +0300 Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: System 1 is a MSI MS-7093 mainboard (aka RS480M2-IL) running [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a FreeBSD kg-fil.kg4.no 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #9: Tue Oct 3 23:08:46 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/s

Re: php4 update

2006-10-16 Thread Olivier Mueller
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 10:25 -0700, Dominik Zalewski wrote: > Hi everybody, > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on i386. I wanted to upgrade my php to > latest version 4.4.4_1 cause of security update. > When running portupgrade php4 I got: > > > => php -- open_basedir Race Condition Vulnerability.

php 4 update - SOLVED

2006-10-16 Thread Dominik Zalewski
I just needed to put a line in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf and regenerate portaudit db. from portaudit.conf: # this vulnerability has been fixed in your FreeBSD version portaudit_fixed="edabe438-542f-11db-a5ae-00508d6a62df" and then: portaudit -Fda && portupgrade php4 Done :) I found solu

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Cheffo
Andriy Gapon wrote: In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan Ermilov. However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware that it is to support. The problem is with choosing proper BAR registers, w

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:15:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new > SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan Ermilov. > However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware that it is to > support. The

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2006-10-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2006-10-16 16:59:07 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-10-16 16:59:07 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2006-10-16 16:59:07 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-10-16 16:59:35 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-10-16 16:59:35 - c

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Chris
On 16/10/06, Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: >> For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches >> along with your technical analysis. > > I think his best bet is a fork, instead.

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Zakharov Vladimir
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006, Andriy Gapon wrote: > 1. find out pci handle of your SMB controller: # pciconf -lv | fgrep 0x0c0500 -A 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:1:class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111043 chip=0x006410de rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'nForce MCP-T? SMBus Cont

Re: nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Art Mason
On Monday 16 October 2006 12:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: > In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new > SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan Ermilov. > However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware that it is to > support. The problem i

Re: Nit in 6-stable

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Carah
Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:27:32 -0400 > Peter Carah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> More nit - the problem with the misidentification of PCI bus 5 >> subordinate bus is still present. Prevents use of PCcard slot until >> a pci write workaround is done. This one is (so f

6.1-RELEASE-p10 kernel panic, backtrace included

2006-10-16 Thread Esa Karkkainen
Hi folks, I've attached panic message and backtrace from my computer below. Is this hw or sw related panic? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0xc47ac888 fault code = supervisor read, page not present inst

php4 update

2006-10-16 Thread Dominik Zalewski
Hi everybody, I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on i386. I wanted to upgrade my php to latest version 4.4.4_1 cause of security update. When running portupgrade php4 I got: => php -- open_basedir Race Condition Vulnerability. Reference: < http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/edabe438-542f-1

nfsmb survey

2006-10-16 Thread Andriy Gapon
In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan Ermilov. However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware that it is to support. The problem is with choosing proper BAR registers, which, as it seems, mi

Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability

2006-10-16 Thread Vivek Khera
On Oct 13, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Same exact error on buildkernel -j2, but success without -j2. I put up logs + kernel config at http://vivek.khera.org/scratch/ buildkernel/ That one has been fixed in RELENG_6, in src/sys/conf/files.i386: Excellent! I'll be updating my pr

kldunload -f has no effect

2006-10-16 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled). Unfortunately, despite the claims of the manpage the '-f' flag does not alter the behaviour of the kldunload tool. How do I get drm unloaded? _

Re: Nit in 6-stable

2006-10-16 Thread Ariff Abdullah
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:03:35 -0200 JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:42, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > > pcm0: > > > * > > > bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory > > > properly.bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly.cd0 at > >

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:46:06PM +0900, Lee Chung-Yeol wrote: > It seems that the plugin directory was changed to > /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins > (was under /usr/X11R6). > > After linking the original plugin files to that dir, it works again. This seems to affect other browser plug-ins

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE? I use native seamonkey-1.0.5 + linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_6 + linux-flashplugin-7.0r68, and this "toolchain" worked for simple flash content under RELENG_6 as of 2006.10.09, an

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Lee Chung-Yeol
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0300, Iulian M wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 06:16, Duane Whitty wrote: > > Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE? > > Hi, > > Same problem here. /etc/libmap.conf looks the same , the patch to rtld is > applied, plugin is install

Re: atapicam problem

2006-10-16 Thread Benjamin Lutz
On Monday 16 October 2006 00:40, Thomas Quinot wrote: > As I mentioned on the previous thread you quoted, I can't see > anything abnormal here. Can you provide complete traces with CAM > debugging options enabled? please include boot -v output. Well, I'm having problems with that. I built a new ke

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Iulian M
On Monday 16 October 2006 06:16, Duane Whitty wrote: > Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE? Hi, Same problem here. /etc/libmap.conf looks the same , the patch to rtld is applied, plugin is installed but after buildworld on Oct 11 plugin does not work anymore. It's

Re: mountd changed?

2006-10-16 Thread Lin Jui-Nan Eric
Hi, On 10/16/06, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had the same problems, but only when trying to export directories from the root filesystem. Your patch below would not help. The following patch (very much inspired by the comment on line 1038 in mountd.c) makes things work for me: I