Hi, Nikolay,
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 2:59:37 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
>> Hi, Nikolay,
>>
>> Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
>>> On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
Would you please give the following patch a try?
http://peopl
sorry everyone i am a dumb [EMAIL PROTECTED] i was tring to install
php5-extensions the option to build the apache module is found in the php5 port
not the php5-extensions very sorry
- RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok folks i looked though the dialog 3 or 4 times looking/
Ok folks i looked though the dialog 3 or 4 times looking/yearning for anything
to do with apache but cannot seem to find anything. Does it go under a
differnt name like SOAP or XML or DXML or something like that.
- Iassen Anadoliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, December 11, 2006 10
On Monday 11 December 2006 23:40, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 11 December 2006 17:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 11, 2006 16:27:23 -0500 John Baldwin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >> Without a
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:25:44 -0600
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FreeBSD 6.x behaviour is slightly against POSIX rules that state
> all successful malloc calls must return unique pointers, so the 7.x
> malloc silently rounds zero-size mallocs to 1. Ideally malloc would
> return uniq
On Monday 11 December 2006 17:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> --On Monday, December 11, 2006 16:27:23 -0500 John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >> Without a core dump, does this mean anything to anyone?
> >>
> >> Sleep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, December 11, 2006 16:27:23 -0500 John Baldwin <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Without a core dump, does this mean anything to anyone?
>>
>> Sleeping thread (tid 101251,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Without a core dump, does this mean anything to anyone?
>
> Sleeping thread (tid 101251, pid 38200) owns a non-sleepable lock
> panic: sleeping thread
> cpuid = 1
>
> The kernel was last upgraded:
>
> FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri
Greg Eden wrote:
> Hello
>
> I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and
> buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of
> Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes. One is a
> HP DL360g3, the other is a HP DL380g3. Both have
On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 2:59:37 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> Hi, Nikolay,
>
> Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Would you please give the following patch a try?
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zoneli
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> But I'll whip up a ggate test case.
Very strange ... I thought I would work through different buffer sizes,
starting with some low value. Here's what gives:
igor# ggated -a localhost -v -R8k -S8k /tmp/ggate_exports igor#
ggatec create -v -R8k -S8k localhost /t
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:54:11PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 11), Dan Nelson said:
> > In the last episode (Dec 11), Luigi Rizzo said:
> > > i was debugging a program on FreeBSD 6, and much to my surprise, i
> > > noticed that malloc(0) returns 0x800, as shown by this prog
Hi, Nikolay,
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would you please give the following patch a try?
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelim-drain
>>
>> Note: Please revert my previous patch against sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c
In the last episode (Dec 11), Dan Nelson said:
> In the last episode (Dec 11), Luigi Rizzo said:
> > i was debugging a program on FreeBSD 6, and much to my surprise, i
> > noticed that malloc(0) returns 0x800, as shown by this program:
> >
> > > more a.c
> > #include
> > int main(int
Craig Boston wrote:
> Have you tried increasing the send/receive buffer size? In my local
> ggate setup I'm running both the client and server with the options
> "-R 196608 -S 196608". I added it a while back after discovering that
> the default buffer size was inadequate in certain situations an
In the last episode (Dec 11), Luigi Rizzo said:
> i was debugging a program on FreeBSD 6, and much to my surprise, i
> noticed that malloc(0) returns 0x800, as shown by this program:
>
> > more a.c
> #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> char *p =
On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would you please give the following patch a try?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelim-drain
>
> Note: Please revert my previous patch against sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c.
>
> This patch should be applied agains
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a script where we start a nttcp for some 500 nttcp client in back
> ground. After some time I could see the nttcp clients are listed in the
> TOP command as "Zoneli" state. Can any one please let me know what is
> meant by Zoneli state?
>
> Test Script:
>
i was debugging a program on FreeBSD 6, and much to my
surprise, i noticed that malloc(0) returns 0x800, as shown
by this program:
> more a.c
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *p = malloc(0);
printf(" malloc 0 returns
> "Craig" == Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:47:41AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
>> That doesn't square with my experience. Although bigger buffers
>> could be involved in a performance problem, what we're dealing with
>> here is a _zero_ traffic sit
Hello
I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup
and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number
of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes.
One is a HP DL360g3, the other is a HP DL380g3. Both have a pair of
2.8GHz Xeo
On Mon, December 11, 2006 10:13 am, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
>
> trying to get php5 to work with apache anyone got any tips i am lost. what
> ever happend to mod_php
cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 && make config - Do you have APACHE option
enabled here?
>
> --
> Computer King/CaNMail
>
> http://www
I'm having problems with SMBFS. I'll start by saying I'm using the PAE
kernel (6.1), so the SMBFS options aren't loaded by default. If I should
add these and rebuild the kernel please let me know:
[not in my kernel]:
options SMBFS #SMB/CIFS filesystem
options
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:05:03AM -0700, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> I tried what you suggested did not see anything about apache in the
> dialog and my php still does not seem to work. DO i need to still
> need to add anything to my apache httpd.conf used to be something
> like this
>
> #
I tried what you suggested did not see anything about apache in the dialog and
my php still does not seem to work. DO i need to still need to add anything to
my apache httpd.conf used to be something like this
# php5
#AddModule mod_php5.c
#Loa
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 08:23:00AM -0800, Holtor wrote:
I have an extremely busy web server here serving mostly static html pages
and images using apache 2.2.3 with sendfile enabled. It's a Dual Xeon
server with 4 GB RAM and I've tweaked many sysctl variables to help the
sy
RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
trying to get php5 to work with apache anyone got any tips i am lost. what ever happend to mod_php
Well I can tell you that it does work, but getting the extensions is
done differently now and you have to do it through php5-extensions port.
Type:
# cd /usr/port
trying to get php5 to work with apache anyone got any tips i am lost. what ever
happend to mod_php
--
Computer King/CaNMail
http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org
Sales, Service, and Hosting
Email, Data, and Web Packages
Ask about web design specials
Affiliates
http://www.c
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:47:41AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> That doesn't square with my experience. Although bigger buffers could
> be involved in a performance problem, what we're dealing with here is
> a _zero_ traffic situation. It seems that it works enough for tasting
> to be successful
Hi,
Would you please give the following patch a try?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelim-drain
Note: Please revert my previous patch against sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c.
This patch should be applied against sys/vm/ [RELENG_6 or RELENG_6_2],
it schedules a drain of uma zones when they
30 matches
Mail list logo
