> > But kernel panic issues are being fixed right up to the last
> > minute in the 6.2 release train (these and em and socket change
> > issues are probably what has delayed the final 6.2). There is a
> > lot of work getting done, but clearly a lot of work to do. I wonder
> > if this is an are
Yeah, I saw postings that refered to "time difference in ps and
processing /proc" but did not know
whether the postings could be trusted. I see no strange behavior on
the machine. I run chkrootkit about once a month just in case.
On 12/23/06, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, De
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:57:35PM -0500, Matthew Herzog wrote:
> I run FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 on an UltraSparc 5 machine.
> I ran chkrootkit yesterday and saw this:
> Checking `lkm'... You have94 process hidden for readdir command
> chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
I thought th
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Matthew Herzog wrote:
>
> > I ran chkrootkit yesterday and saw this:
> > Checking `lkm'... You have94 process hidden for readdir command
> > chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
>
> Does LKM stand for "Linux Kernel Module"? If so, no wonder the check has
> gone
Matthew Herzog wrote:
> I ran chkrootkit yesterday and saw this:
>
> Checking `lkm'... You have94 process hidden for readdir command
> chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
Does LKM stand for "Linux Kernel Module"? If so, no wonder the check has
gone lala :)
__
Greetings -
I'm curious.. how many folks out there actually use FreeBSD 6-STABLE as
an IPv6 firewall, with dynamic routing?
I only pose the question, because it seems there have been (and still
are) a few fairly major bugs that affect this certain type of setup:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query
Hello.
I run FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 on an UltraSparc 5 machine.
I ran chkrootkit yesterday and saw this:
Checking `lkm'... You have94 process hidden for readdir command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
Everything else was deemed clean by chkrootkit.
When I booted into singl
It's Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:00 . I'm in a small dim room with
doors labeled "Dungeon" and "Forbidden". There is noise, the door
marked Dungeon flies open and [EMAIL PROTECTED] SHOUTS:
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:43:54 +
> From: Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Poss
for those interested, i have backported to RELENG_6 the i945 support
that is in HEAD. The relevant patch is at
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/FreeBSD/20061223-i945.patch
and it is very simple - it touches only one file.
cheers
luigi
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 06:59:16AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> As a point of curiosity, I would like to hear from some of the people in
> this thread who will continue to run 4.11 or 4-STABLE for a while, to find
> out what ports they are relying on. A note about whether you consider
> security
Ok just to finish this thread off:
After taking the power away from my switch for 30 seconds and powering
it up again - everything automagically works back to normals.
Merry Christmas & a Happy new Year.
--
Kimi
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 06:45:04AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> (2) The ports team will no longer work really hard (tm) to keep ports
> working there. They will keep building packages, etc.
To clarify, we will be building 4.X packages as time and resources permit.
Fixing problems that show up t
12 matches
Mail list logo
