I had to on an emergency basis replace my aging P-1 Firewall. The guys
at my hosting company gave me an AthlonXP 2200+, and with 6.1 (all the way
up to today's RELENG_6_1), it works fine.
I tried(!) to put 6.2-PRE (RELENG_6) on it, but no matter what I do, it panics
when either NTPD or SSHD star
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:56:35AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> For some reason, the ifconfig command now fails to create the proper
> routing table entries. With the 2006-11-03 kernel, if I configure my
> gif0 tunnel as follows:
>
> ifconfig gif0 create
> ifconfig gif0 213.154.244.69 193.109.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[resending to list, cleared kernel logs]
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I had to on an emergency basis replace my aging P-1 Firewall. The guys
> at my hosting company gave me an AthlonXP 2200+, and with 6.1 (all the way
> up to today's RELENG_6_1), it works
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
> This works: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Dec 14 11:34:36 CET 2006
> This doesn't: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Dec 30 11:27:11 CET 2006
> I'm not sure it that's all that matters, I can supply more information
> if needed.
Yes, you'll need to send at least a kernel
i think this is related:
panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex (null) @ /r+d/6.2/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:217
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 715 tid 100055 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x2b: nop
db> ps pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchancmd
715 71043 0 R+ CP
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
>
>> This works: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Dec 14 11:34:36 CET 2006
>> This doesn't: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Dec 30 11:27:11 CET 2006
>
>> I'm not sure it that's all that matters, I can supply more information
>> if needed.
>
> Yes, you'll
On Saturday 30 December 2006 15:11, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
> >> This works: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Dec 14 11:34:36 CET 2006
> >> This doesn't: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Dec 30 11:27:11 CET
> >> 2006
> >>
> >> I'm not sure it that's all
X to Dallas, TX).
Anyone got ideas?
It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed at.
Could you try applying it?
You can also fetch it from:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of C
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:57:49 +0100
Karol Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a "me too" message. AMD Athlon / FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE i386
My box uses FreeBSD / amd64, cvsupped today, and I also got stuck with
a panic. Looks familiar, except it panics whenenver I go to multiuser,
I eve
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had to on an emergency basis replace my aging P-1 Firewall. The guys at
my hosting company gave me an AthlonXP 2200+, and with 6.1 (all the way up
to today's RELENG_6_1), it works fine.
I tried(!) to put 6.2-PRE (RELENG_6) on it, but no matter wha
300+ miles away (Distance from Austin, TX to Dallas, TX).
Anyone got ideas?
It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed at.
Could you try applying it?
You can also fetch it from:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Robert N M
X to Dallas, TX).
Anyone got ideas?
It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed at.
Could you try applying it?
You can also fetch it from:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Normally, I'd be more than happy to, but, given:
1) t
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:08:30 + (GMT), "Robert Watson"
...
>
> The following commit went into RELENG_6 yesterday; could you check and
> see if
> it's present in the version that panics, and if you move to a revision
> slightly before this (i.e., from the 28th) the panic goes away? It coul
;>>
>>> It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed
>>> at. Could you try applying it?
>>>
>>> You can also fetch it from:
>>>
>>> http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
>>>
&
patch applied and panic gone!
nice quick work!!
Happy New Year
danny
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:24:25 + (GMT)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed
> at. Could you try applying it?
Ok, with that patch applied an a new kernel built, I'm upp and running
again.
That was quick - thanks to all
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed at.
Could you try applying it?
You can also fetch it from:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Normally, I'd be more than hap
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:56:35AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> For some reason, the ifconfig command now fails to create the proper
>> routing table entries. With the 2006-11-03 kernel, if I configure my
>> gif0 tunnel as follows:
>>
>> ifconfig gif0 create
>> ifc
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 04:04:50PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>...
> I've gone ahead and MFC'd the missing tcp_subr.c patch and the change now
> appears stable on by 6-STABLE test box. I'd appreciate it if other people
> experiencing the panic could slide forward to confirm (or perhaps less
>
FC I just pointed at.
> Could you try applying it?
>
> You can also fetch it from:
>
>http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Sorry, it was lost in the noise as we have lots of other local changes to
tcp_subr.c at work so I missed this hunk. :(
Robert Watson wrote:
>> P.S. out of curiosity - now that I have configured kernel with DDB and
>> KDB options, is there any performance penalty of running such kernel?
>
> No, it shouldn't really have any effect on performance. The one thing
> to watch out for is that your system will no longer r
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
P.S. out of curiosity - now that I have configured kernel with DDB and
KDB options, is there any performance penalty of running such kernel?
No, it shouldn't really have any effect on performance. The one thing to
watch out
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
>
>> Robert Watson wrote:
P.S. out of curiosity - now that I have configured kernel with DDB and
KDB options, is there any performance penalty of running such kernel?
>>>
>>> No, it shouldn't really have any effect o
JoaoBR wrote:
> 572 cabq frames transmitted
> 11 cabq xmit overflowed beacon interval
>
> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11b
So one other thing came to mind. If your ap is operating in 11b and you
have many multicast frames q'd up for power save stations then they
JoaoBR wrote:
> I need some help here, this is not a single case, I get this on a several
> machines, this is releng_6 , recent, but old problem getting ugly
>
>
> first I get this kind of events in messages, independent if it is client mode
> or hostap or adhoc
>
> Dec 28 16:50:53 ap1-cds ker
JoaoBR wrote:
> On Thursday 28 December 2006 21:52, you wrote:
>> check this message:
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031216.html
>>
>> run "/usr/src/tools/tools/net80211/wlandebug/wlandebug -i ath0 power" and
>> see if one of the hosts on your wlan has powersa
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> I had named segfault a day or so ago under high load ("adnslogres -c
> 200" against a webserver logfile) after logging the following:
Hard to tell if your problem here is related to running on 5.5 or not,
but of course recommendation number one is to consider upgrad
The system freezes randomly and no longer accepts any input and after a minute
of being 'frozen' reboots.
Initiaily thought it was related to firefox as this can usualyl crash it
'randomly' , Seems to be an issue with the wireless function (given through an
Belkin RT2500USB (ural0) ).
I'm fairl
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 10:47:25PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> As you discovered, the solution is to force a fsck to repair all
> corruption and then proceed (optionally disabling bg fsck
> permanently to prevent a recurrence ;-)
Is it time yet to have ano
The system freezes randomly and no longer accepts any input and after a minute
of being 'frozen' reboots.
Initiaily thought it was related to firefox as this can usualyl crash it
'randomly' , Seems to be an issue with the now un-supported ural0 driver.
I'm fairly new to kernel debugging so am no
Updated my sources to STABLE today, and followed the handbook as I normally
do to make sure I don't forget anything, however on `make buildkernel
KERNCONF=GENERIC` I got the following:
...
MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GENERIC
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-dec
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:20, Sam Leffler wrote:
thank you for answering, lots of good points and I will try to answer any of
them
> >
> > I really do not know what this event means (ether type 5e4), for my
> > understandings it is vague in the source, so I am lost here
>
> Seems pretty c
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:29, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> See my previous reply to you. Lamont is directing you to look for
> stations in your network operating with power save enabled.
>
even if there are stations with powersaving on we can do anything against it
this is an ISP environment whe
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:37, Sam Leffler wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > 572 cabq frames transmitted
> > 11 cabq xmit overflowed beacon interval
> >
> >
> > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11b
>
> So one other thing came to mind. If your ap is operating in 11b and yo
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Hi,
I just updated one of my machines from RELENG_6 as of 2006-11-03, to
RELENG_6 as of 2006-12-29. This caused the IPv6 tunnel which this box
uses, which had been doing fine for months, to suddenly stop working.
Reverting to my 2006-11-03 kernel res
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
It looks like the attached patch was missed in the MFC I just pointed
at. Could you try applying it?
You can also fetch it from:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20061230-20061230
Sven Willenberger presumably uttered the following on 12/18/06 12:33:
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 23:20 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:29:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> <>
>
>>>
FWIW, I do see the following appearing in the /var/log/messages:
ufs_renam
JoaoBR wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:20, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> thank you for answering, lots of good points and I will try to answer any of
> them
>
>
>>> I really do not know what this event means (ether type 5e4), for my
>>> understandings it is vague in the source, so I am lost h
JoaoBR wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:29, Sam Leffler wrote:
>> See my previous reply to you. Lamont is directing you to look for
>> stations in your network operating with power save enabled.
>>
>
> even if there are stations with powersaving on we can do anything against it
>
> this
JoaoBR wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:37, Sam Leffler wrote:
>> JoaoBR wrote:
>>> 572 cabq frames transmitted
>>> 11 cabq xmit overflowed beacon interval
>>>
>>>
>>> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11b
>> So one other thing came to mind. If your ap is operati
Sean C. Farley wrote:
>> I just updated one of my machines from RELENG_6 as of 2006-11-03, to
>> RELENG_6 as of 2006-12-29. This caused the IPv6 tunnel which this box
>> uses, which had been doing fine for months, to suddenly stop working.
...
>> For some reason, the ifconfig command now fails to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:36:30 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Yours makes the third report of this that I know of ... one of us is
> running 6.2-RC, one 6.1-RELEASE ... wha
42 matches
Mail list logo
