For purposes of making the subject less true, setting up greylisting
with an optional tarpit for known baddies can be very effective. See
Dan Langille's recent Onlamp article[1] or for that matter my tutorial[2]
for how this is done using PF and spamd - this way it doesn't matter much
which MTA(s)
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're missing the iicbus, iicbb, and iicsmb drivers.
Yeah, of course, thank you. Sorry.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, se
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:08:55AM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've just updated the sources and tried to rebuild kernel with 'device viapm'
> in kernel configuration file. 'make depend' fails:
You're missing the iicbus, iicbb, and iicsmb drivers.
Taken from my kernel config:
## Power mana
I've just updated the sources and tried to rebuild kernel with 'device viapm'
in kernel configuration file. 'make depend' fails:
<..>
awk -f ../../../tools/makeobjops.awk ../../../kern/device_if.m -h
awk -f ../../../tools/makeobjops.awk ../../../kern/linker_if.m -h
awk -f ../../../tools/makeobjops.
On 1/24/07, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:30 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
> ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new
> > file.
> BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base k
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:10, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Working setup:
> - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with
> rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook.
>
> After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new
> file.
BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel /
code?
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway
__
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Stephen Casner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know, though, whether there is any way in NEWCARD to power down
> the PC Card / Cardbus slot? I didn't see anything in the 6.2 release
> note regarding changes in that area.
Hmm, doesn't 'pccardc power ..
Tobias Roth wrote:
For your convenience: http://fsck.ch/rtld_dlsym_hack_new.diff
or the attached file (if it makes it through).
Thank you guys, for all responses.
Alex
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:36:06 -0600
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
> > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> >
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
> libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a p
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
> libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
Open /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej in one
On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Ilia Gorstkin wrote:
I'm having trouble with arp:
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4500)
and
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4242)
these messages fall on the console in a plenty.
I do tcpdump -exn "arp[0]=0x45 and arp[1]=0":
tcpdump: verbose output su
Scot Hetzel wrote:
Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
Thanks again,
Alex
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.orig Fri Sep 24 08:04:52 2004
|+++ libexec/rt
Hello,
Working setup:
- FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with
rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook.
After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me.
On 1/24/07, Gustavo Feijó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I know it's not the right list to write to, but I'll still try a shot.
There is freebsd-isp@, as well :)
I'm running sendmail in my FreeBSD box and wish to block mails comming
from domains with no ptr configs.
Am I missing some
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:03:06 -0200
"Gustavo Feijó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl.spamhaus.org', `"550 Mail from "
Try replacing with 'zen.spamhaus.org'. Can't comment on the
others. Are you only using RBLs for spam prevention?
HTH,
Dominic
___
Hi there,
I know it's not the right list to write to, but I'll still try a shot.
I'm running sendmail in my FreeBSD box and wish to block mails comming
from domains with no ptr configs.
Am I missing something?
My sendmail-rx.mc is like this
FEATURE(`access_db',`hash -T -o /etc/mail/access.db')d
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
My guess as to why you're not getting a response is that
suspend/resume issues currently have no champion amongst FreeBSD
developers, and therefore they are simply not being addressed. This
is disappointing, but part of life in a volunteer project.
Under
Hi all!
FreeBSD 6.2-release.
I'm having trouble with arp:
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4500)
and
arp: unknown hardware address format (0x4242)
these messages fall on the console in a plenty.
I do tcpdump -exn "arp[0]=0x45 and arp[1]=0":
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -
Hi folks,
I'm wondering if someone please could clarify some IPSec specific
questions to me?
IPSEC_FILTERGIF:
What are the consequences when enabling this if one does use IPSEC
(or FAST_IPSEC) w/o any GIF tunnels? Are there any or does
IPSEC_FILTERGIF only influence packet flow with gif devices?
Per olof Ljungmark skrev:
Glenn Becker wrote:
All -
I've been away from FreeBSD for some time and have been updating my
installation, getting used to the ways of portupgrade, etc.
Have noticed that Firefox keeps emitting what sound like console
beeps - I haven't established much of a patte
please unsubscribe
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> org/mailman
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Pieter Migo
___
MMB Holding
MMB : +31 40 2333 5 25
ChartNet : +31 40 2333 5 33
Fibbs : +
In response to Pieter Migo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> please unsubscribe
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Bill Moran
Coll
Jeff Royle wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
Jeff Royle wrote:
Jeff Royle wrote:
I could use some advice on this issue I have had with my raid
controller.
I am not really running much on the system yet, postfix, Pf + pflogd,
rlogind, ssh, bsnmp and ntpd. While I was just reading a file with
less the syst
> When dealing with Cisco<->othervendor, I've never seen auto-neg
> work properly. One has to always hard set the speed and duplex
> on both sides for it to work.
Nowadays auto-neg almost always works for us, even for Fast Ethernet.
We have Cisco-Extreme, Cisco-Juniper, Cisco-Cisco, Cisco-Riverst
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:10:21PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-Jan-23 14:22:54 -0500, Andresen, Jason R. wrote:
> >I have a project that requires me to simulate a link with varying but
> >well defined delay. The link is guarenteed to deliver packets in
> >order, so I wish to maintain
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:54:51PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 12:38, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > * Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 1/15/07, Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >No. What happens when you use/load "um
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:25:37PM +0100, Robin Gruyters wrote:
> Should this not be visible on the switch as well?!?
>
> Here some output from the interface on the server and from the switch
> (Cisco)
>
> [development interface]
> bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> options=1b
> ether 00
Rinat K. Nugaev wrote:
В сообщении от 24 января 2007 13:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
написал(a):
On 1/23/07, Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using FreeBSD 6.2, I'm having trouble with the Supermicro X7DBR-8+
motherboard (dual Xeon 5130 CPUs on the Blackford chipset -
http://www.supermicro
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a fix for it already, or maybe a workaround?
The problem was that the driver code was not properly obtaining
error statistics from the Broadcom chip, thus errors _were_
(before the fix) not being calculated/accounted for. Now (after
the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Robin Gruyters wrote:
> I have the same problem here. At the moment I only have two servers
> upgraded from FreeBSD 5.4R to FreeBSD 6.1R and one to FreeBSD 6.2R.
>
> And here is the netstat -ni output from our development server:
>
> [netstat -ni]
> Nam
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:57:06PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Yes. The specific line in my rc.conf is:
>
> ipv6_ifconfig_gif0="2001:7b8:2ff:146::2 2001:7b8:2ff:146::1 prefixlen 128"
With that setup you should be able to just do:
ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:7b8:2ff:146::1"
ipv6_ifconfig_gif0="2
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:30 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I
> > J> >wanted
> > J> >> to send
Hello,
* Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >No. What happens when you use/load "umass" and unload "atausb" ?
> Everything works nice with umass. It creates the da0 device node.
> It just shows up these errors, as it always
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 12:38, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/15/07, Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >No. What happens when you use/load "umass" and unload "atausb" ?
> >
> > Everything works nice with umass. It creates t
В сообщении от 24 января 2007 13:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
написал(a):
> On 1/23/07, Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Using FreeBSD 6.2, I'm having trouble with the Supermicro X7DBR-8+
> > motherboard (dual Xeon 5130 CPUs on the Blackford chipset -
> > http://www.supermicro.com/products/mother
On 13 Dec 2006, at 19:30, Greg Eden wrote:
On 13 Dec 2006, at 09:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> D> > Greg Eden wrote:
> D> >> Hello
> D> >>
> D> >> I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via
> D> >> cvsup and
> D> >> buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the
>
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:16:13 -0500
Von: Ben Hacker Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Stable FBSD , questions FBSD
Betreff: Audio (Record) not functioning... (record interrupt timeout)
> Any help will be Greatly appreciated! I currently believe this is a
> pro
***
Click here to view our e-mail legal notice:
http://www.mxit.co.za/pdfs/mxit_legal.pdf or call: +27 21 888 5000
***
Any progress on the BCE serdes driver?
-Origina
42 matches
Mail list logo