Re: uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:05:59AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:19, Scott Lambert wrote: > > I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a > > 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11 > > box, ns, and is not currently active. It

Re: uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x?

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:19, Scott Lambert wrote: > I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a > 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11 > box, ns, and is not currently active. It's running all the daemons it > will be in production, but traffic

Re: uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x?

- Original Message - From: "Scott Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FreeBSD STABLE" Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:19 AM Subject: uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x? I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to repl

uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x?

I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11 box, ns, and is not currently active. It's running all the daemons it will be in production, but traffic is not pointed at it yet. I don't think the gmirror vs. adapte

WOL question

I am hoping someone here who has more familiarity with the ACPI code can enlighten me I have an internal bug filed complaining that FreeBSD disables wake-on-lan on the hardware. This means that if you boot, say, Linux, even Knoppix as a quickie, and then shutdown, if the hardware supports it,

Re: Sendmail problems

Gustavo Feijó wrote: > Found the problem origin: > > Amavis > > Apr 10 13:34:02 serv01 amavis[26962]: (26962-01) (!!)TROUBLE in > process_request: Can't create directory > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070410T133402-26962: Too many links at > /usr/sbin/amavisd line 4215, line 2. > > Searching

Re: Sendmail problems

Found the problem origin: Amavis Apr 10 13:34:02 serv01 amavis[26962]: (26962-01) (!!)TROUBLE in process_request: Can't create directory /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070410T133402-26962: Too many links at /usr/sbin/amavisd line 4215, line 2. Searching for solution Any aid would be wellcome

Sendmail problems

Hi there, I'm experiencing a kind of trubble i've never seen... Till today 4am it was all working fine. Now, with none chages, i'm having this message error: Apr 10 11:31:22 serv01 sm-mta-rx[21328]: l3ADXMuQ024306: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:57:48, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=7053

Re: Changing Console Resolution - Vidcontrol

Stefan Lambrev wrote: > All those things work only under i386 right ? > There is no option VESA in amd64 ? Right. Calling function in the VESA BIOS (which is 32bit i386 code) is not supported under FreeBSD/amd64. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29,

Re: watchdog network card

On Tuesday 10 April 2007 01:24, Andrew Reilly wrote: > Wow. Somehow we've slipped through a one-year timewarp: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:47:54AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 07:40, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > > After the last rebuild on my amd64-x2 box, both the nve ethernet

panic: spin lock held too long

Hi, A week old -stable panic trace inlined below. The kernel config file is SMP + KDB/DDB options. Any help to debug futher is appreciated. Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xca78ed80 for > 5 seconds panic: spin lock held too long cpuid = 2 Uptime: 1