On 5/8/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:45:12AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
that or, does mfs speeding things up really work? remains to be
seen ...
Of course it does...even the fastest disk hardware on the market
(well, as of a year ago) is several times
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:04:57PM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
On 5/8/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:45:12AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
that or, does mfs speeding things up really work? remains to be
seen ...
Of course it does...even the fastest
Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
Server with 6.1 on board:
===
x# uname -a
FreeBSD x 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Sep 18 17:06:13
MSD 2006 [EMAIL
Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
Server with 6.1 on board:
===
x# uname -a
FreeBSD x 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Sep 18 17:06:13
MSD 2006 [EMAIL
Hi,
Newtunes Support wrote:
Hi all!
I have the folliwing issue on 6.1 and 6.2
df -k utility always shows me incorrect disk usage.
This is more for questions@
and already discussed many times:
from man tunefs:
-m minfree
Specify the percentage of space held back from normal
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
So, over 7000 sockets with pretty much all processes shut down ...
Shouldn't the garbage collector be cutting in somewhere here?
I'm willing to shut everthing down like this again the next time it happens
(in 2-3 days) if someone has some other
On 2007-May-08 13:04:55 +0400, Hanatsu Tori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad4s1a 76866422 51507978 1920913273%/
devfs 110 100%/dev
*/dev/ad6s1d 77879478 75006042 -3356922 105%
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
m.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Dear all,
I have just completed the merge of a significant number of UNIX domain socket
bug fixes and cleanups from HEAD to RELENG_6. While my hope is that these are
generally low-risk, and should improve UNIX domain socket stability and
performance under load, there were quite a few
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
Are there any messages from ntpd in /var/log/messages?
What's the output
On Tue, 8 May 2007 14:03:58 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
You say that ntpd is running, but what does the output of 'ntpq -p'
show?
Is
When I use 'top' command to check my system, some processes are shown like
'php'. The manual told these processes are swapped out.
But my problem is .. I don't have swapping device (swapoff -a). Where are
they swapped to ?
last pid: 29144; load averages: 0.69, 0.67, 0.82
up 19+11:25:27
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
If I remember correctly, you wrote that 11k sockets are
in use with 90 jails. That's about 120 sockets per jail,
which isn't out of the ordinary. Of course it depends on
what is running in those jails, but my guess is that you
just
Mars G. Miro wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
there's been a lot of threads in teh past that a buildworld on mfs
increases speed --- tho it might not be the appropriate test for
high-end machines (speaking of w/c I just gots a T2000).
It depends on what
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server
On Tue, 8 May 2007 15:33:51 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ken
___
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:00:08AM -0400, Ken Sallot wrote:
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
Any ideas?
Martin Dieringer wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add restrict lines for every server and for
localhost, like
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:29:08AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:00:08AM -0400, Ken Sallot wrote:
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make
Peter,
I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
But I have new problem.
fsck -y does not fix anything.
** Last Mounted on /var
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=188426 (162368 should
Newtunes Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
Not a good idea. It breaks all sorts of things.
And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
The value was correct before, too. There probably were
some files that
On May 8, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
Are you sure that your
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add restrict lines for every
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
running.
ntpd is running also.
Can nobody tell where the problem
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Richard Coleman wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
What's the output from ntpq -p?
# ntpq -p
No association ID's returned
#
Are you using pf?
sorry for the short answer: no
m.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius
At 10:00 AM 5/8/2007, Ken Sallot wrote:
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
There were a lot of commits (14) in the
Thanks a lot for irrefragable answer, Oliver!
I have resolved the issue on one server (there was a little overdraft) and
I'll try to resolve issue with fsck and /var when PROD will have lower load.
Thanks to all,
Dmitry
2007/5/8, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Newtunes Support [EMAIL
Martin Dieringer wrote:
What's the output from ntpq -p?
# ntpq -p
No association ID's returned
#
Are you using pf? I think there is some kind of boot time race
condition between pf and ntpd. On my firewall (uses FreeBSD 6.2 with
pf), I always have to restart ntpd after boot, otherwise it
* Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-08 16:29 +0200]:
How are you redialling? If you get a new dynamic IP
address, it might be necessary to restart ntpd.
For example, if you use ppp(8) for dial-up, you can
write a linkup script that performs the restart.
I use the attached patch.
On 08/05/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-May-08 13:04:55 +0400, Hanatsu Tori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad4s1a 76866422 51507978 1920913273%/
devfs 110 100%
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Martin Dieringer wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Ian Smith wrote:
Now I got following while playing sound on the Compaq:
kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from 183711700 usec to
183167434 usec for pid 12 (swi4: clock sio)
here I have a
On May 8, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Martin Dieringer wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
# cat /etc/ntp.conf
server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntpd
You must add restrict lines for
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
Yup, after getting your first note I switched to cvsup2, re-did it, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, May 08, 2007 15:14:29 +0200 Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of jails are those? What applications are
running inside them? It's quite possible that the
processes on one machine use 120 sockets per jail,
while
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:35:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Regardless, I'm building world now to try and replicate the issue.
buildworld and buildkernel both built fine here. Try re-sup'ing.
I ran into a similar issue here -- for whatever
Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's own mfsroot
images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
sysinstall)? It appears that one could develop a simplified
network-based installation process based around fdisk, disklabel,
newfs, mount_ufs, fetch, and pax,
On 2007-May-08 15:33:51 +0200, Martin Dieringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# cat /var/db/ntp.drift
500.000
#
There seems to be a bug in ntpd where the PLL can saturate at
+/-500ppm and will not recover. This problem seems too occur mostly
where the reference servers have lots of jitter (ie a
On 2007-May-08 18:39:23 +0400, Newtunes Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have resolved this issue using forsed unmount (umount -f /var)
And after I mounted /var again df -k shows me correct value.
But I have new problem.
fsck -y does not fix anything.
** Last Mounted on /var
You left out the
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 03:40, Matthew X. Economou wrote:
Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's own mfsroot
images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
sysinstall)? It appears that one could develop a simplified
network-based installation process based
On 5/8/07, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
there's been a lot of threads in teh past that a buildworld on mfs
increases speed --- tho it might not be the appropriate test for
high-end machines (speaking of w/c I
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:36 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-05-09 04:36:36
43 matches
Mail list logo
