KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i did the command pkgdb -Ff and it broke my X (xfce4) the desktop
had been able to come up, but the cursor was the X that it has
while it is booting.. i was able to start a terminal, but not a mozilla
browser. i had been able to use the terminal, but
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.2 Kernel don't support Broadcom NIC BCM 5708S model. One need
to patch kernel Source to make it live. Below i written steps i took.
1, Download patch
http://people.freebsd.org/~dwhite/patches/bce-serdes-20070111.tar.gz
2, cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
3, cp GENRIC MYKERNEL
4,
On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:51:13 -0400
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pkgdb -Ff had had a pango problem, so i did a portupgrade -f pango.
now i can't even get a terminal in my xfce4
I think you missed some of the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
I'm also a bit confused on
I have mentioned this before about releasing a new major version of
FreeBSD at such short intervals. Now I am wondering what path the
FreeBSD community is taking in regards to server and desktop use.
Stuff I would love to see in FreeBSD 7.x (CURRENT) before 7.0 release
which looks like it isnt
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade
comamnd, just verifying
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i did the command pkgdb -Ff and it broke my X (xfce4) the desktop
had been able to come up, but the cursor was
2007/5/16, Sachin Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
NIC (Network Card) is not detected by FreeBSD 6.2 into PowerEdge Blade
1955 Server. I need FreeBSD in these server . Please help me.
it works with 6.2-STABLE.
download a 6.2 snapshot and install it.
works fine here
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 04:30:50PM +0100, Chris wrote:
The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest
ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
Stuff I would love to see in FreeBSD 7.x (CURRENT) before 7.0 release
which looks like it isnt going to happen
[snip]
More hardware support - FreeBSD still has poor hardware support when
compared to other OS's, in particular vendors such as
Please don't top-post.
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade
comamnd, just verifying
Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on
pango being unable to use the new version.
Make sure you look
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:08:39PM +0530, Sachin Sharma wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.2 Kernel don't support Broadcom NIC BCM 5708S model. One need to
patch kernel Source to make it live. Below i written steps i took.
1, Download patch
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:50 +0100
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have mentioned this before about releasing a new major version of
FreeBSD at such short intervals. Now I am wondering what path the
FreeBSD community is taking in regards to server and desktop
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:51:07PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
A more user friendly installer so datacentres stop been put off FreeBSD.
Although work on a new installer is ongoing, nobody ever seems to be
clear what the problems are with the
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest
ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Please don't top-post.
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade
comamnd, just verifying
Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on
pango being
here is my error message
onfigure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 = 2.12.0atk = 1.9.0
pa
ngo = 1.12.0cairo = 1.2.0) were not met:
No package 'atk' found
Requested 'cairo = 1.2.0' but version of cairo is 1.0.2
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
what i sent may or may not make sense. i run pine for email
client and am having some buffer lag right now. my keystrokes
are not being immeditaelyt echoed and i didn't really mean to send
it. if it DOES make sense, feeel free to comment.
sorry about that. also typos are a symptom of the
On Thu, 17 May 2007, John Nielsen wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:37:15 pm KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Please don't top-post.
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the
portupgrade comamnd, just
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:37:15 pm KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Please don't top-post.
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the
portupgrade comamnd, just verifying
Yes. Otherwise, you may
Greetings everyone... I am observing what appears to be a similar problem as
well...
I have a dedicated server with *very* light traffic. It looks like every day
or so my server load slowly climbs from 0.20 to 14.00 and then stays there
indefinitely locking down the system [until I do an
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Please don't top-post.
KAYVEN RIESE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the -r option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade
comamnd, just verifying
Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:35:10PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
Now this is totally bogus. The freeze before the 6.0 release was VERY
long and several have been longer than this one has been so far.
I think the complaint may be more a result of this being a deeper freeze
than normal.
That's
Greetings everyone... I am observing what appears to be a similar problem as
well... [referring to the posts from earlier this month with the same
subject]...
I have a dedicated server with *very* light traffic. It looks like every day
or so my server load slowly climbs from 0.20 to 14.00 and
Yes... this is possible Currently, I am on MySQL 4.1.20 ... but I
believe that MySQL is backwards compatible... so I can definitely try this.
Do you know if this bug is squashed with MySQL 5.0.37 ?
Thanks,
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [mailto:[EMAIL
On 5/17/07, Albert Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Can you go for MySQL 5.0.37?
--
Regards,
-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
As someone who has had to show many people how to use the FreeBSD
installer, I can confirm what Chris is referring to.
Here's some of the generic end-user complaints I've heard (and some
of which I have);
[...]
As someone who only very rarely plays with the installer,
Hello
In general This is what I use for my libmap.conf , it works fine
for me any you may want to give it a try.
[mysqld]
libpthread.so libthr.so
libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2
Note nothing in MySQL 4.1 compiled on FreeBSD 6.2 should use libc_r.so .
The other thing in your libmap that
Hello,
While making some tests with fragmented udp DNS responses (with
EDNS0), we discovered a possible problem with ipf and pf in FreeBSD
6.2 and 7.0 (200705 snapshot).
Our test is a DNS query to an DNSSEC enabled server which replies with
a ~4KB udp response. We do this with the following dig
This should be rejected as keep frags is meaningless here.
pass out log quick on bge0 proto udp from xxx.xxx.xxx.113/32 to any port = 53
keep state keep frags
You need
pass in quick from any to any with frag keep frag
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St.,
This should be rejected as keep frags is meaningless here.
pass out log quick on bge0 proto udp from xxx.xxx.xxx.113/32 to any port = 53
keep state keep frags
You need
pass in quick from any to any with frag keep frag
The reason is that ip fragments
Hello Albert,
Hello @list,
first, i be a native german speaker, so please excuse my ugly english.
Greetings everyone... I am observing what appears to be a similar problem as
well...
I have a dedicated server with *very* light traffic. It looks like every
day
or so my server load slowly
Mark: Thanks for the tips about the placement of the log into [mysqld] --
maybe it will start to show some error messages if I put it up into the
mysqld section. :-) I will also take a look at table_cache and query_cache
and read_rnd_buffer_size. [I've got some reading / figuring out to do!]
Chris wrote:
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on vulnerable versions of ports as a
result of this?
This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with
which I agree.
Ivan Voras wrote:
Chris wrote:
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on vulnerable versions of ports as a
result of this?
This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with
which I agree.
Hmm... Branching is
- Albert Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
key_buffer = 32M
key_buffer has the most influence over the performance of MyISAM database.
You should increase it as much as possible. On a dedicated 2GB server, 1GB is
good. But it only helps, if you actually have indexes. There is no point
34 matches
Mail list logo
