Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
?
Did you recompile Perl after the last installworld? If not, do so.
No i did not do it
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
/lib/libc.so.5
I chflaged it, deleted it and made a link to
libc.so.6
this guy sounds familiar. i am really hosed right now, i can't
run a browser simultaneously, maybe i am being really stupid,
but what do you mean when you say
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
?
Did you recompile Perl after the last installworld? If not, do so.
No i did not do it explicitelly. However, i
Hmm, I have the x11/xorg port, same problem could not open default font
'fixed' Oh, well. So now I have an X-less system, Don't mind so much myself,
but my other family members freaked out :( They thought the shell prompt was
an error message!
You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias port,
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
joke
Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just
because you don't read other threads on the ML
/joke
On another thread the conclusion was that installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
?
Did you recompile
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:11:38AM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use two SATA II disks over an Adaptec 1210SA PCI SATA
Controller (based on SiI 3112 SATA150 chip).
While trying to use the disks I get shortly the following message and the
system is hard freezing soon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
#include locale.h
#include errno.h
#include ctype.h
main(){
char
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Ahh, well, i just forgot. Of course it is not for a long time
now. But anyhow, why locale in C does not work? And how 'so' lib
is selected for an executable? How OS selected so.5 or so.6 for a
executable file?
During compile-time linking (when ld(1) is called),
usually
From the setlocale(3) manual page:
... A locale argument of NULL causes setlocale() to return the
current locale. ...
--
-max
2007/5/24, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot
Massimo Fusaro wrote:
From the setlocale(3) manual page:
... A locale argument of NULL causes setlocale() to return the
current locale. ...
Right. that why i first
call
setlocale(LC_CTYPE, ru_RU.CP1251);
to set locale
and the call
setlocale(LC_CTYPE,NULL);
to check what locale is
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
[...]
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf(IS LOWER
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
solved the fixed font problem.
I've found this
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
[...]
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf(IS
* Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
most of my pcf.gz files are corrupt (20 bytes long).
'portupgrade -f' on my fonts is fixing this
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
solved the fixed font problem.
Hello,
I've been trying to update my system recently.
(using cvsup to sync the sources, *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6)
uname -a
FreeBSD machine.somewhere 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2: Thu
Sep 28 23:13:24 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NOYAU_IPFW amd64
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:16:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. atapicam cd error (JoaoBR)
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:44:20 -0300
From: JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: atapicam cd error
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:03:18 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:49:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8527B/1.02 at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST
On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue Apr
17 17:38:20 HST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ dmesg | grep
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue
Apr 17 17:38:20 HST 2007
[EMAIL
On Thursday 24 May 2007 12:12:34 Joe Altman wrote:
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v 1.42.2.5
2007/05/15
16:19:42 thomas Exp $);
I am, and I just wanted to acknowledge your message, unfortunately I
won't be able to further look into it immediately, as I'm about to
On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:10:02 Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
Hi
so you are suggesting a rollback? I compiled on may 21st and 23rd
and as Joe Altman confirmed too it's not working anymore on amd64 ...
on i386 it's ok, may be this is a good moment then to
Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Log:
Fix assertion accidentally changed to HEAD version. This was breaking the
RELENG_6 build.
Pointy hat to: des
Apologies for the breakage, which should be fixed now. I was working
through my MFC reminder backlog and got a little ahead of
On Thu, 24 May 2007 16:41:01 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:10:02 Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
Hi
so you are suggesting a rollback? I compiled on may 21st and 23rd
and as Joe Altman confirmed too it's not working
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:46:24AM +0400, grimnir wrote:
You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias port, this may fix the problem.
nope:
jhengis~ % pkg_info | grep font-alias
font-alias-1.0.1X.Org Font aliases
pkg_info: show_file: can't open '+COMMENT' for reading
This does not seem to be
On Thursday 24 May 2007 21:48:04 JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue Apr
17 17:38:20 HST 2007
[EMAIL
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
most of my pcf.gz files are
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
upgrade had gone the most cleanly).
Hello,
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Werror -D_KERNEL
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include
-finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
-ffreestanding -Wall
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:42:38PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
I've found this problem on one
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
=== share/info install
=== include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
***error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include
***error code 1
I tried cd usr.bin/touch make make install
but it does
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:57:46PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
/usr/src/sys/modules/procfs/../../fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c: In function
`procfs_doprocregs':
/usr/src/sys/modules/procfs/../../fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c:96: warning:
implicit declaration of function `PROC_ASSERT_HELD'
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:46:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
=== share/info install
=== include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
***error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 23
15:19:22 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING
amd64
(compiled from sources updated immediately before the build started, no
Clock in sync? That's the usual cause for things like this.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
=== share/info install
=== include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:45:52AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
# portupgrade -Rf
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed
May 23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING amd64
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
# portupgrade -Rf libXft
before you do the portupgrade -a?
No, that is to avoid a
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
Kris,
FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortunately I did 'em
pretty much as I read 'em... so I noticed the CAVEAT *after*
On Thu, 24 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cvsup and built around 20.30 BST
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
=== share/info install
=== include install
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
***error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include
***error code 1
I tried cd
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:59:51AM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
Kris,
FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortunately I did
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:46:09 JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed May
23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING amd64
(compiled from sources
Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed
May 23 15:19:22 EEST 2007
[EMAIL
On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:31:49 -0600
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:09 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD
uname -a
FreeBSD sagan.cai 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sat May 5 23:34:08 CST
2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAGAN i386
The results of make buildworld on this system:
ide -k _crunched_chroot_stub chroot.lo
cc -static -o rescue rescue.o cat.lo chflags.lo chio.lo chmod.lo
Actually, I don't see how RELENG_X branch will help. %-\
I would suggest this scheme:
branch . - as now, the recent versions
branch sec - versions bump strictly at 1-st of january and 1-st of july,
other updates fix only security issues.
That would be really great improvement to ports, but not
50 matches
Mail list logo
