Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Kip Macy
On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kip Macy wrote: > I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and > LINT builds for me. Re-cvsupped your version from RELENG_6 and all is well now. Good to hear. Thanks. -Kip _

Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
Kip Macy wrote: I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and LINT builds for me. Re-cvsupped your version from RELENG_6 and all is well now. Thanks. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Kip Macy
I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and LINT builds for me. -Kip On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kip Macy wrote: > Oops - thanks. I've included the file from cvs on my box, however i now get this error while compiling. --- cc -O2 -fn

Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
Kip Macy wrote: Oops - thanks. I've included the file from cvs on my box, however i now get this error while compiling. --- cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -g -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/s

Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Kip Macy
Oops - thanks. On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include

cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER /usr/src/sys/mo

Listing tar archives from tape (was Re: Unrecognized archive format with RELENG_6_2 and RELENG_6)

2007-06-17 Thread Tim Kientzle
After that I try to read/list the tar from tape with tar -t: $ sudo tar -tf /dev/sa0 archive.dmp tar: Unrecognized archive format: Inappropriate file type or format But when I extract the archive from tape, it works perfectly: $ sudo tar -xvf /dev/sa0 Please try the most recent -STABLE version

Buildkernel error in acpi_hpet.c

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limi

Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports?

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Andrews
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: I may have had to use the statically linked /rescue to do some things, I don't remember. It's not completely trivial, but someone who knows their way around a FreeBSD system can do it. We did it by using miniroot on swap partition of the system disk. T

Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports?

2007-06-17 Thread Michael Schuh
Hi, i have another Way that might be good, also for remote take over. You know Colin's depenguinator? I have made my own new depenguinator, that could install a complete base-system by building it on another box. Anyone interested? I have written an Howto, that is at the time not online. cheer

Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports?

2007-06-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0400, Indigo 23 wrote: > > Does anyone think that its worth the hassle? If you do manage to get > > it up and running, will you see any noticeable advantages or is it > > better to just stick with

Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports?

2007-06-17 Thread Roland Smith
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0400, Indigo 23 wrote: > Does anyone think that its worth the hassle? If you do manage to get > it up and running, will you see any noticeable advantages or is it > better to just stick with i386? The only caveat that I can see is a > recompilation of all the