> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:38:21AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
> >
> > There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
> > becomes effective, and it w
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:38:21AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
>
> There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
> becomes effective, and it would be nice if
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Richard Foulkes wrote:
Ok, so how are you supposed to control membership of the wheel
group via ldap? Ok, you COULD remove the local wheel entry in /etc/
group, but this would probably be a bad idea if the ldap server
were unavailable.
You've aptly summarized my
Hi,
Would it be possible for a committer to take a look at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115697
There's only about a month or so before the new daylight savings rule
becomes effective, and it would be nice if -STABLE had the changes
committed before then.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan
Try:
wheel:*:0:root,us
It looks like pam was stopping at the first matching line as you would
expect from the man page for the group file. If there is a bug it is in
the more liberal interpretation by other software.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Ok, so how are you supposed to control membership of the wheel group
via ldap? Ok, you COULD remove the local wheel entry in /etc/group,
but this would probably be a bad idea if the ldap server were
unavailable.
I've had a similar problem to this where group names are duplicated
across di
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
I found this while trying to migrate groups into LDAP, but you don't
need LDAP to reproduce this, simply place the following in /etc/group
wheel:*:0:root
wheel:*:0:us
That's a misconfiguration. From "man 5 group":
The group field is the
Hi,
I think I found a deficiency wrt. to pam_group (which also hits sudo(8)
so this might be libc related instead).
I found this while trying to migrate groups into LDAP, but you don't
need LDAP to reproduce this, simply place the following in /etc/group
wheel:*:0:root
wheel:*:0:us
% getent gro
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual
disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into
a cron
job and do it on we
On Aug 21, 2007, at 16:31 , Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
(ROUTER.POLLI
FreeBSD ghreen.sphere 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 19
20:10:46 CDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GHREEN
i386
Attached dmesg, attached kernel config.
During bootup about 1 out of 5 times my box freezes right after it
enters userland at the "Gathering entropy:" spot,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
> Hi
>
> FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
> Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
> src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
>
> (ROUTER.POLLING is GENERIC + options DEVICE_POLLING a
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
(ROUTER.POLLING is GENERIC + options DEVICE_POLLING and ALTQ,
IPSEC, also pfsync and carp)
This weekend I had a disk faili
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Now, what i don't understand is why Hardware_ECC_Recovered and
> Seek_Error_Rate are so hight. The first one is maybe relate
> to cabling problem. The driver are all in hot swap baskets of
> supermicro 2u case. Maybe backpanel is no so good?
>
>
> While we are on the subject:
>
> What is the practical difference between VERIFY and REBUILD with regards
> to a RAID-5 array?
Verify should at a minimum read all the data. Ideally, it would read the
checksum blocks too to make sure they are still valid, but it might not.
Rebuild should read a
You can run smartmontools on disks behind 3ware controllers, eg
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,0 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did this:
smartctl /dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a
for each driver on another server. Two driver are pretty old, the driver
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual
disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into
a cron
job and do it on weekly basis. Also, it
17 matches
Mail list logo
