Re: LOCK_PROFILING in -stable

2007-10-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071020 10:21] wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >>Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6, > >>this means I can relatively easily backport LOCK_PROFILING from FreeBSD-7 > >>to Fr

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state underpersistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Oleg Derevenetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071020 09:58] wrote: > > > Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang > situation, > > > but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from > > > here: > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/d

Re: BIND 9.3.4 assertion failure on restart

2007-10-20 Thread Doug Barton
Jeremy, I saw this on Thursday, but I also saw that Mark had answered you and I had to focus on $REAL_LIFE so sorry for the delay. On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: The following is a reproducible problem on a couple of our DNS servers: (one running 6.2-STABLE, one running 7.0-PRER

Re: LOCK_PROFILING in -stable

2007-10-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6, this means I can relatively easily backport LOCK_PROFILING from FreeBSD-7 to FreeBSD-6. Do we want this? I'd like to do it if people want it. I think i

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state underpersistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
> > Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, > > but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from > > here: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html > > > > After my break to de

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state underpersistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Rainer Hurling
Looking into PR kern/104406 it seems, that this describes exactly what I am experiencing on three of my systems over the last weeks. They are running FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (known as 7.0-CURRENT not long ago ;-) ). On these machines I often observe hangings, sometimes only a few seconds, on other

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state underpersistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: > This is probably another bug because: [skip] Then there should be another one distinct bug as God likes the Trinity. Eugene ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state underpersistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
> > > Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, > > > but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from > > > here: > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html > > > > > > After

Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00

2007-10-20 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
CmdLnKid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > __/_ __ \__ >| | >| Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. | >| Copyright (c) 1979, 19

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state under persistent CPU load

2007-10-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:05:01PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, > > but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from > > here: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/devel

Hallmark Ecard

2007-10-20 Thread Hallmark Cards
[header.gif] Hello , A friend has sent you a Hallmark Ecard Click [1]here to view your Ecard . If you would like to return an Ecard to him simply go to [2]http://ecards.msn.co.uk/ MSN in association with Hallmark Cards Your privacy is our priority. Cli

Re: can I do 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2 via cvsup

2007-10-20 Thread CmdLnKid
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:42 +0800, robert.a.chalmers wrote: I should just be able to change the TAG in standard-supfile from 6_1 to 6_2, do a cvsup, and the builds etc to end up with 6.2-RELEASE right? yes? no? ta rob Change that tag and then follow anything thats said in the README UPDATING

Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00

2007-10-20 Thread Scott Long
CmdLnKid wrote: _ ._ _ , _ ._ (_ ' ( ` )_ .__) ( ( () `) ) _) (__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__) `~~`\ ' . /`~~` ,:::

Re: LOCK_PROFILING in -stable

2007-10-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
Alfred Perlstein wrote: Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6, this means I can relatively easily backport LOCK_PROFILING from FreeBSD-7 to FreeBSD-6. Do we want this? I'd like to do it if people want it. I think it should be done, performance is a lot better t

acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00

2007-10-20 Thread CmdLnKid
_ ._ _ , _ ._ (_ ' ( ` )_ .__) ( ( () `) ) _) (__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__) `~~`\ ' . /`~~` ,::: ; ; :::,