xl0 watchdog timeout?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Should I use device polling or there is another solution for this? dmesg: ... CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (2135.06-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6

[SiS180] SATA drives are not detected on = 6.0

Hi, SATA drives on SiS 180 SATA150 (ASUS P4S800D mobo) controller are not detected on any release 6.0, though they work on 5.5. I've attached dmesg from 5.5 and 7.0-BETA2 in case it may be helpful. It's kinda production system, so I couldn't play much with it. Any suggestions, hints on how to

Re: 7.0-BETA2 Panic after ifconfig

Hi Robert ! If you run this from single-user mode, do you get the same result? What is the general network configuration of the system, and what sorts of services are running? This is my laptop there is no services running... I use ipfw, natd, bridge and tap to work with qemu Could you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Christian, Christian S.J. Peron wrote: Please try the attached patch. I have committed this to head and it somehow slipped through the cracks in terms of an MFC (patch /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) Do we need to expose /dev/ptmx as well? A

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

Dear colleagues, any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA300 disks in gmirror) Long and short of it, rrd sucks. I'm not sure whats sucks worse

Re: Jails and PF states on locahost

No-one with any clues or recommendations? :/ CCing to -stable too.. Thanks -- Johan Ström Stromnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stromnet.se/ On Oct 29, 2007, at 09:37 , Johan Ström wrote: Hello I got a FreeBSD 6.2 box running a few jails, with a pretty strict PF ruleset. I got a problem

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

On 11/11/2007, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If a binary/library that is currently used gets removed/replaced, it will be copied to memory. The process will not even recognize this. Only restarting the process will remove the old version from memory and cause the new one to be used.

Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 5.5 STABLE

Hello, I am trying to update my version of FreeBSD from 5.4 to 5.5-STABLE. This is one of the many things I've yet to get my feet wet with yet, and so I'm not entirely sure what it is I am doing. I've made a backup of my most critical work. Some links I've found describing this process: 1.

Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 5.5 STABLE

On Tuesday 13 November 2007 06:08:10 Nic Reveles wrote: Hello, I am trying to update my version of FreeBSD from 5.4 to 5.5-STABLE. This is one of the many things I've yet to get my feet wet with yet, and so I'm not entirely sure what it is I am doing. I've made a backup of my most critical

7.0 beta2 vs. SATA DVD drive

Hi, I was trying to install 7.0 beta 2 on a system that has a SATA attached DVD drive. The system starts to the point where it waits for the SCSI devices to initialize. After that it starts reading from the install media and constantly gets read timeouts == no installation possible. Does anybody

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

Adrian Chadd wrote: On 11/11/2007, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If a binary/library that is currently used gets removed/replaced, it will be copied to memory. The process will not even recognize this. Only restarting the process will remove the old version from memory and cause the

Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load

Hi. Panagiotis Christias wrote: In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute) during the good and bad times, since it only provides