* David G Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071221 23:31] wrote:
> > > > Can you use a placeholder vnode as a place to restart the scan?
> > > > you might have to mark it special so that other threads/things
> > > > (getnewvnode()?) don't molest it, but it can provide for a convenient
> > > > restart p
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:08:09AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Yes, rewriting the syncer is the right solution. It probably cannot be done
quickly enough. If the yield workaround provide mitigation for now, i
amsn-0.96_1 does not build because of the following error:
===> Building for amsn-0.96_1
CXX utils/TkCximage/src/TkCximage.cpp.o
In file included from utils/TkCximage/src/TkCximage.cpp:11:
utils/TkCximage/src/TkCximage.h:23:25: tkPlatDecls.h: No such file or directory
gmake: *** [utils/TkCx
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:08:09AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >Yes, rewriting the syncer is the right solution. It probably cannot be done
> >quickly enough. If the yield workaround provide mitigation for now, it
> >shall go in.
>
> I don't think rewr
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Why don't you just do the buildworld on another machine?
As I don't use the machine as a primary workstation at the moment, it
doesn't really matter to me if it takes 1 hour or 3 months, I start the
buildworld in a screen'd shell and check on it periodically. When it
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 01:40:00PM +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > > > It appears, though I'd need to instrument the code more to be sure,
> > > > that the slowdown is coming from file I/O. Could it be that there
> > > > less concurrency or more overhead in FreeBSD file operations than
> > > > the
Hello,
I purchased a Jetway J7F4K1G2E w/VIA Eden 1.2GHz cpu/motherboard combo
(http://e-itx.com/jetway-j7f4k1g2e-mini-itx-motherboard.html) that I'm
trying to get working with the FreeBSD padlock driver. Based on what I
see from the manufacturer's CPU support list ,
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/
This appears to work. No packet loss with vfs.numvnodes
at 32132, 16K PPS test with 1 million packets.
I'll run some additional tests bringing vfs.numvnodes
closer to kern.maxvnodes.
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
As Bruce Evans noted, there is a vfs_msync() that do almo
Hello,
I have migrated a machine from 6.2-STABLE to 7.0-BETA4; this machine is
configured as an access point, with the following PCI card:
ath0: mem 0xfbed-0xfbed irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2
With the same configuration, which used to work without any problem on
6.2-STABLE, the machine
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
I still don't understand the original problem, that the kernel is not
even preemptible enough for network interrupts to work (except in 5.2
where Giant breaks things). Perhaps I misread the problem, and it is
actually that networking works but u
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
I'm just an observer, and I may be confused, but it seems to me that this is
motion in the wrong direction (at least, it's not going to fix the actual
problem). As I understand the probl
On 22/12/2007, Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apples and Oranges, I know, but if you're building a "simple" reverse
> cacheing proxy, have you considered Varnish? Would be very interessting
> how it would compare to a) FreeBSD+Squid b) Linux+Squid and c)
> Linux+Varnish.
Personally
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > > I have noticed an entry in GENERIC called
> > >
> > > device cpufreq
> > >
> > > Could this have any influence on the performance (on FreeBSD)?
> > >
> > > I saw this device late in the 7.0 release-process and I since I'm
> > > accustomed to
In preparation for 7.0-RC1 the release branch, RELENG_7_0, has been
created. I'll send another message when the 7.0-RC1 builds are done,
this is just to let people who use cvsup updates know about the new
branch.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here,
At 11:41 PM 12/21/2007, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Another attempt to use USB-storage with FreeBSD, another moment of
hair-pulling frustration.
I attach the card-reader with the media card already inserted (detection of
card-insertion has not worked in a long time, if ever).
Perhaps its the one ca
At 05:21 AM 12/22/2007, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
>Since you're using the fs as a cache, I presume it wouldn't be a big problem
>if the data was lost by a power outage (or crash). If so, you can try the
>async mount option to seriously increase fs performance.
Linux also speeds up if you try mount
> > > It appears, though I'd need to instrument the code more to be sure,
> > > that the slowdown is coming from file I/O. Could it be that there
> > > less concurrency or more overhead in FreeBSD file operations than
> > > there is in Linux? Even with SoftUpdates turned on, the cache
> > > volume
On Saturday 22 December 2007, Brett Glass wrote:
> I will need to build several Web caches over the next few months,
> and just took advantage of the Christmas lull (and a snowy day,
> when I couldn't work outside) to test FreeBSD 7.0 BETA 4 to see how
> it will perform at this task. I built up a 4
Joshua Coombs wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
>> Would that be a multiday buildworld?
>>
>> Brian
>
> 10 days on average. : ) I'm trying a 7 build without -pipe to see if I
> can squeak it through with 64MB RAM + 384MB swap, I'd much prefer not
> having to do a dump/restore to reallocate space for more
Hi there,
your script didn't had what I wanted for the ps, that's why I wrote
simpler one for myself,
that's do the job for me - finds a string from ps axu from any jail :)
here it is, hopes it's useful (quick 15mins hack script).
#!/bin/sh
#list all jails processes
#$1 - jid - jail pattern || AL
On Fri, 21.12.2007 at 22:31:24 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> As has been reported in some other messages on this list, Linux is currently
> blowing FreeBSD away. It's taking as much as 20% less time to get through
> the benchmark, depending on exactly how the random shuffle came out. This is
> wit
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > I will need to build several Web caches over the next few months,
> > and just took advantage of the Christmas lull (and a snowy day,
> > when I couldn't work outside) to test FreeBSD 7.0 BETA 4 to see how
> > it will perform at th
> I will need to build several Web caches over the next few months,
> and just took advantage of the Christmas lull (and a snowy day,
> when I couldn't work outside) to test FreeBSD 7.0 BETA 4 to see how
> it will perform at this task. I built up a 4 core FreeBSD box, and
> asked a friend who's a L
23 matches
Mail list logo
