-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:05:16 +1030 Jarrod Sayers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's actually good to know, as you're now (unless I am mistaken) the first
> user to contact me about this problem on non-i386 systems. One user, plus
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I never tried on i386, but in my case it was an amd64 system as well ... not
> sure if that is relevant or not ... has anyone seen this problem *with* i386?
When I read about it, I was in the middle of upgrading the problem
On 1/2/08, Chris H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, in the final analysis I've decided (now that it's (7B4) installed...)
> I'll just keep /boot, /root (and presumably /dev) on the already available
> and running install disk (da3).
> Then perform:
>
> # gstripe label -v -s 131072 bigstripe \
> /d
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Tom Judge wrote:
Jarrod Sayers wrote:
I hope I can confirm your frustrations. There is a threading issue
with Nagios when it's binaries are linked against libpthread(3)
threading library, the default on recent FreeBSD 5.x releases and all
6.x releases. The issue is random
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:24:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> - --On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 22:54:33 + Tom Judge <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not sure if this is related at all but out of the 3 nagios deployments we
> > have here I have only ever seen it on one (It currently ha
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
I have read all related threads about performance problems with multi
core systems but still have no idea what to do to make thinks better.
Below
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
I have read all related threads about performance problems with multi
core systems but still have no idea what to do to make thinks better.
Below are results of testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 22:54:33 + Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Not sure if this is related at all but out of the 3 nagios deployments we
> have here I have only ever seen it on one (It currently has 2 nagios threads
> spin
Jarrod Sayers wrote:
On 03/01/2008, at 1:56 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
I have also seen this issue, but have always put it down to the way that
we manage our nagios deployments with cfengine. I will try to deploy
this change and monitor for the problem to see if it persists.
I hope I can confirm yo
I've just posted a message with that title to sparc64@ with crosspost
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you're interested in deciding on where we're going with
sparc64, I invite you to join that thread. (Please don't reply to
this message; 2 lists is probably one too many).
mcl
___
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
---8<---snip---8<---
to be sure.
Are you sure?
---8<---snip---8<---
volume.
Yes, I'm sure. I
On 03/01/2008, at 1:56 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
I have also seen this issue, but have always put it down to the way
that
we manage our nagios deployments with cfengine. I will try to deploy
this change and monitor for the problem to see if it persists.
I hope I can confirm your frustrations. Th
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe
volume (or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab
example below i
On Jan 2, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and Adaptec
RAID
cards is a bad thing for production systems, and IMO should be
avoided.
Well, yeah, the error message
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
I'm not aware of any reason to avoid Adaptec RAID cards specifically
on
amd64 now; there were a number of problems in the past but they should
be addressed now.
My main concern is that there is no *reliable* way to monitor the
status of an Ada
Ed Maste wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:19:15AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Mike Andrews wrote:
Command Error: the current AFAAPI.DLL.>
In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Ed Maste wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:19:15AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Mike Andrews wrote:
Command Error:
In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and Ad
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:19:15AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Mike Andrews wrote:
>
> > Command Error: >the current AFAAPI.DLL.>
>
> In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
> card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and Ad
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
(or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab example below
it doesn't sound like you intend to but I just wanted to be sure.
Quoting John Nielse
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past. But never
---8<---snip---8<---
I had originally intended to create a raid mirror on the whole lot of HD's
during the install process. But I wa
> > Can you confirm that this fix helped for you? i.e. do you still
> > see the problem?
> FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #14: Sun Dec 30 21:50:59 EST 2007
> I'm still seeing this problem, but it isn't nearly as bad. I still
> get some jerky mouse movement, but music doesn't skip now when I'm
> compiling.
I no
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
(or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab example
below it doesn't sound like you intend to but I j
> What's the procedure to configure buildworld to get sendmail to build
> libmilter using poll() instead of select()?
Add this to /etc/make.conf:
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=-D_FFR_WORKERS_POOL
And then rebuild/reinstall libmilter:
cd /usr/src/lib/libmilter/
make clean
make depend
make
make install
Note
>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=-D_FFR_WORKERS_POOL
>
> Do I want this one or just -DSM_CONF_POLL ?
It would probably be safest to just use -DSM_CONF_POLL as that has
had more testing and will get by the select() limits on fd_set.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail
Vivek Khera wrote:
What's the procedure to configure buildworld to get sendmail to build
libmilter using poll() instead of select()?
There is discussion on the postfix mailing list that some high-load
performance issues could be solved by switching this, but the "fix" was
to hack the libmilte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This patch fixes the problem!
# ifconfig -l
bce0 bce1 lo0
# ifconfig -l ether
bce0 bce1
Thanks
pluknet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/12/2007, Krassimir Slavchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 'ifconfig -l [address_family]' does not work correct on REL
On Jan 2, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=-D_FFR_WORKERS_POOL
Do I want this one or just -DSM_CONF_POLL ?
I'm running into issues with postfix failing to connect to the milter
because it is too busy (specifically the dkim milter) and one theory
was to use poll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have read all related threads about performance problems with multi
> core systems but still have no idea what to do to make thinks better.
> Below are results of testing postgresql on HP
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 15:26 +, Tom Judge wrote:
> Michael Butler wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
I'm pretty sure that he's getting ready to ship 3.0 release w/ broken
threading on FreeBSD.
I haven't had time to test it on NetBSD yet, but since it can be fixed
by
On Jan 2, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
What's the procedure to configure buildworld to get sendmail to build
libmilter using poll() instead of select()?
Add this to /etc/make.conf:
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=-D_FFR_WORKERS_POOL
[ ... ]
Note that bug 118824 has already asked for this to b
What's the procedure to configure buildworld to get sendmail to build
libmilter using poll() instead of select()?
There is discussion on the postfix mailing list that some high-load
performance issues could be solved by switching this, but the "fix"
was to hack the libmilter header file to
Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
G'day ...
Yesterday, I setup nagios to do some system monitoring ... installed the
latest version from ports into a jail, so that I could easily move it around
between machines as I upgrade, without l
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Mike Andrews wrote:
Command Error: the current AFAAPI.DLL.>
In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and Adaptec RAID
cards is a bad thing for production systems, and IMO should b
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past. But never
---8<---snip---8<---
I had originally intended to create a raid mirror on the whole lot of HD's
during the install process. But I wasn't presented, nor could I find that
opti
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 with the following in my kernel configuration:
---
device sound
device snd_emu10kx
---
My soundcard is a Soundblaster Live!
In trying to make the rear-channel volume default to "100" I added the
following to my /boot/device.hints:
---
hint.pcm.
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chris H. wrote:
Hello, and happy New Year to all!
I'm hoping to update all our servers to 7 in the near future.
As such, I'm experimenting with it on one of our less prominent
production servers.
My procedure for it's installation and usage:
download
Hello, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris H. wrote:
Where is the option to create, and install to a gMIRRORED drive-set?
If not, why?
If not, it possible to install to one drive, mirror all availabl
Chris H. wrote:
Hello, and happy New Year to all!
I'm hoping to update all our servers to 7 in the near future.
As such, I'm experimenting with it on one of our less prominent
production servers.
My procedure for it's installation and usage:
download 7-CURRENT disk1 iso (B4) from nearest freebs
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:23:52PM +1100, Geoff Roberts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems you can't recursively use the "include" rule specification
> with devfs in Freebsd 6.2. I couldn't see a note about this in the
> devfs man page so I'm not sure whether this is expected behaviour or
> not.
The manpa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118987
Ruben van Staveren wrote:
> Hi Krassimir,
>
> Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> 'ifconfig -l [address_family]' does not work correct on RELENG_7
>
> If you suspect a regression in functionality,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris H. wrote:
> Where is the option to create, and install to a gMIRRORED drive-set?
> If not, why?
> If not, it possible to install to one drive, mirror all available drives
> with
> the data on the installed drive?
sysinstall does not provide an
I'm seeing some regressions in the various management tools for Adaptec
AAC cards on FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 amd64.
I'm trying to use both the 32-bit FreeBSD aaccli binary from the
sysutils/aaccli port, and also the 64-bit FreeBSD arcconf from the
sysutils/arcconf port (v5.20.17414). The card is an A
Hi,
It seems you can't recursively use the "include" rule specification with devfs
in Freebsd 6.2. I couldn't see a note about this in the devfs man page so I'm
not sure whether this is expected behaviour or not.
For example, the devfsrules_jail is defined as the following
in /etc/defaults/dev
Hello,
I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past. But never
really saw a definitive answer to it. So let's try it again. :)
I'm looking to upgrade all our servers to 7 in the not-to-distant future.
As I look to overcome the quirks in 7 as they apply to our hardware (I'm
already
44 matches
Mail list logo
