I found a solution for the local periodic scripts that is executed twice.
Various pages on the net suggested putting
local_periodic="/usr/local/etc/periodic" in /etc/rc.conf.
This did not work, I found the solution to be to put it in
/etc/periodic.conf.local.
Regards,
Nicki
_
Hello Nicki and FreeBSD friends,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:54:50AM +0200, Nicki de Wet wrote:
> I found a solution for the local periodic scripts that is executed twice.
> Various pages on the net suggested putting
> local_periodic="/usr/local/etc/periodic" in /etc/rc.conf.
>
> This did not w
Willy,
You are right, I can actually put it in /etc/periodic.conf.
The periodic scripts all contain the following line:
. /etc/defaults/periodic.conf
This file contains the following:
# periodic script dirs
local_periodic="/usr/local/etc/periodic /usr/X11R6/etc/periodic"
On the system where
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 15:10 -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> huub wrote:
> > I have a problem running the Atheros AR5414 wireless mini-pci-card
> > (Compex model WLM54AGP23) with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE (GENERIC i 386) on a
> > Soekris 4521.
> >
> > I get lots of messages:
> > "interrupt storm detected on "
On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Eirik Øverby wrote:
Yes, I am absolutely sure of this.
I considered using the snapshot tool, however I need to reduce
dependencies to an absolute minimum (as one target environment is
very strict on allowing additional so
I have verified this on two machines, but it would be helpful if others
out there can reproduce it too. Also, I do not know if it is Xorg or
the FreeBSD keyboard drivers, since I see no way to reproduce on the
console (i.e. turn off repeat).
In an xterm, type: "xset r off". Then try some multipl
I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
I am currently recompiling the kernel to support options PAE (KERNCONF=PAE)
in order to see this. I understand this is still considered a Beta
implementation ,and this is a production bo
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:10:17PM -0500, Kevin K wrote:
> Does anyone have any alternative solutions that would provide a more
> reliable environment other than PAE?
You have two options, and these are the only two I'm aware of:
1) Run amd64 (64-bit).
2) Run i386 with PAE enabled.
I would choos
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:10:17PM -0500, Kevin K wrote:
> I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
> FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
>
>
>
> I am currently recompiling the kernel to support options PAE (KERNCONF=PAE)
> in order to see this. I understand this
i've seen RAID 0 through 3 (skip 2 ;) )
thanks,
matheus
--
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
ZFS has RAIDZ - very similar to RAID5 (with added features), if you
don't mind ZFS's current experimental state.
-Joe
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> i've seen RAID 0 through 3 (skip 2 ;) )
>
> thanks,
>
> matheus
>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 07:51:32 pm Joe Peterson wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > i've seen RAID 0 through 3 (skip 2 ;) )
> >
> > thanks,
>
> ZFS has RAIDZ - very similar to RAID5 (with added features), if you
> don't mind ZFS's current experimental state.
gvinum supports RAID5, but is a bit
* Kevin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080219 14:40] wrote:
> I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
> FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
>
>
>
> I am currently recompiling the kernel to support options PAE (KERNCONF=PAE)
> in order to see this. I understand this is s
- "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have any alternative solutions that would provide a
> more
> > reliable environment other than PAE?
>
> Besideds PAE some people have mentioned running an amd64 system.
>
> One thing to consider is that PAE in 6-stable (6.
14 matches
Mail list logo
