Ian Smith wrote:
I take Jonathan's point that it would be nice to have this functionality
in atacontrol, though perhaps the BUGS section in ataidle(8) precludes
merging that? cc'ing Bruce Cran in case he wants to add something ..
ataidle is at the moment quite dumb about sending commands: it d
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 14:52 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Has any work been done recently towards adding SATA Native Command
> > > Queueing as well as ATA APM and acoustic management to
On 5/13/08, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> There had been large changes to enhance re(4) stablility and many
> users reported positive results. But it still seems to have issues
> for certain models. See kern/123202, kern/123563.
> If you encounter issues on latest re(4), please
George Hartzell wrote:
Adam McDougall writes:
> George Hartzell wrote:
> >[...]
> > - I've read in the gjournal man page that when it is "... configured
> > on top of gmirror(8) or graid3(8) providers, it also keeps them in
> > a consistent state..." I've been trying to figure o
On May 13, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Christian J. Wong Cruz wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to download the ia64 distribution CDs from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.0/ and
the list
is
[ ... ]
if you look at the disc 2 and 3, the size is 364K is it ok?. I'd
like to
install fr
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:22:10PM -0400, Ben Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I only just now subscribed, so my apologies if this has been covered
> and my cursory search missed it.
>
> I am seeing a similar issue to the one described in the email below
> (pasted from a web listing of this list
Hello All
This issue goes back some time, but I do not see a solution. Sorry
about the cross post
not sure where this belongs. Here is an overview of my issue which is
similar and I hope
someone can point me in the direction of a solution.
I have experiencing an odd socket related issue on a
Hello All
This issue goes back some time, but I do not see a solution. Sorry
about the cross post
not sure where this belongs. Here is an overview of my issue which is
similar and I hope
someone can point me in the direction of a solution.
I have experiencing an odd socket related issue on a
Hello, I'm trying to download the ia64 distribution CDs from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.0/ and the list
is
[FILE] 7.0-RELEASE-ia64-bootonly.iso. . Feb 25 18:10 62M [VIEW]
[DOWNLOAD]
[FILE] 7.0-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso . . . Feb 25 18:11429M [VIEW]
[DOWNLOAD]
Adam McDougall writes:
> George Hartzell wrote:
> >[...]
> > - I've read in the gjournal man page that when it is "... configured
> > on top of gmirror(8) or graid3(8) providers, it also keeps them in
> > a consistent state..." I've been trying to figure out if this
> > simply
Adam McDougall writes:
> [...]
> I believe gjournal uses 1G for journal (2x512) which seemed to be
> sufficient on all of the systems where I have used the default, but I
> quickly found that using a smaller journal is a bad idea and leads to
> panics that I was unable to avoid with tuning.
George Hartzell wrote:
I've been running many of my systems for some time now using gmirror
on a pair of identical disks, as described by Ralf at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
Each disk has single slice that covers almost all of the disk. These
slices are combined into the gmirror
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Stuyts wrote:
| Hi,
|
| While doing an rsync from a zfs filesystem to an external usb hd (also
| zfs), the rsync processes hung in zfs state. I could not kill these
| processes, although the rest of the server seemingly continued to run
| fine. Th
Hi,
While doing an rsync from a zfs filesystem to an external usb hd (also
zfs), the rsync processes hung in zfs state. I could not kill these
processes, although the rest of the server seemingly continued to run
fine. The reboot command did not work. Next I tried a shutdown now
command.
On 2008-May-13 08:33:03 -0700, Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Most all old 32 bit ports should work but upgrading them can
>mess things up. All the new compiles will generate 64 bit
>binaries but any port dependencies on a shared library will
>be wrong.
It's actually somewhat worse than t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:18:32 EDT bazzoola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On May 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
>>
>> >> I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
>> >
>> > echo kqemu_enable=YES >> /etc/rc.conf
>> > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/k
On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:56:20 -0400 bazzoola wrote:
> I just cant get kqemu to work on my AMD64 SMP!
> I setenv WITH_KQEMU
> I compiled the port with make -DWITH_KQEMU
> I edited src.conf and added WITH_KQEMU=yes
> I make config and checked KQEMU ALPHA support
> I am running
> #uname -a
> FreeBSD
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 14:52 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Has any work been done recently towards adding SATA Native Command
> > Queueing as well as ATA APM and acoustic management to FreeBSD?
> >
> > I found this PR (with patch) to add APM and acou
> If you run only the latest standard binaries you are right
> but typically one acquires useful things over time and it is
> not always possible to recompile them and also, why bother.
true, but in this case I want to change a more or less vanilla
7-STABLE/i386 to a more or less vanilla 7-STABLE/
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 19:33 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
> > I seem to be able to lock my machine by going into wpa_cli and asking it
> > to 'reassoc'. The reason for question mark after "hard" is that debug
> > information (caused by wlandebug and athdebug) is be
Hi all,
I only just now subscribed, so my apologies if this has been covered
and my cursory search missed it.
I am seeing a similar issue to the one described in the email below
(pasted from a web listing of this list).
That is, my ssh connection will occasionally be dropped with the
message
Di
I've been running many of my systems for some time now using gmirror
on a pair of identical disks, as described by Ralf at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
Each disk has single slice that covers almost all of the disk. These
slices are combined into the gmirror device (gm0), which is t
On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:59:11 BST Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the 64 bit FreeBSD world, /usr/lib32 contains libraries
> > for the x86 binaries and /lib, /usr/lib contain 64 bit
> > libraries so a straight install may mess things up. At the
> > very least you should backup your 32
> In the 64 bit FreeBSD world, /usr/lib32 contains libraries
> for the x86 binaries and /lib, /usr/lib contain 64 bit
> libraries so a straight install may mess things up. At the
> very least you should backup your 32 bit root partition --
> but I have a feeling my advice is already too late :-)
On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:18:36 BST Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a box currently running i386 which I want to change over to
> run amd64. I have installed a second drive into the machine on which
> I have put a basic install of amd64, and have compiled up the world
> and kertnel fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pete French wrote:
| I have a box currently running i386 which I want to change over to
| run amd64. I have installed a second drive into the machine on which
| I have put a basic install of amd64, and have compiled up the world
| and kertnel from sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pete French wrote:
|> I did roughly the same but slightly different method:
|
| ah, and did it work o.k. ?
|
| -pete.
|
Yes and I have been using the system for almost 8 months now as my
primary desktop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
> I did roughly the same but slightly different method:
ah, and did it work o.k. ?
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hugo Silva wrote:
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello Pierre-Luc,
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 6:26:49 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been
fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now?
I am using ZFS on my laptop as a typica
I have a box currently running i386 which I want to change over to
run amd64. I have installed a second drive into the machine on which
I have put a basic install of amd64, and have compiled up the world
and kertnel from source.
Can I simply switch the original partition over by mounting it up
and
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello Pierre-Luc,
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 6:26:49 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been
fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now?
It's still an experimental feature in FreeBSD, thoug
Hello Pierre-Luc,
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 6:26:49 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been
> fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now?
It's still an experimental feature in FreeBSD, though the memory
allocation issues might
32 matches
Mail list logo
