Re: Unresponsive after dtrace

2008-08-31 Thread Wes Morgan
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, John Birrell wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:35:16AM -0500, Wes Morgan wrote: I know this has been reported already, but I want to give a "me too". After installing a new world and kernel from the tree yesterday afternoon, I let my system run all night. This morning everyt

Re: bin/121684: : dump(8) frequently hangs

2008-08-31 Thread Michael
Any progress here? Does anyone know if this will be fixed in 7.1 latest, or should we start looking for different backup solution (in this case I would suggest to remove dump from the source tree - having a backup tool that doesn't work is worse than having none). After upgrading we basically cann

ZFS performance issues (solved?!)

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
For those people experiencing a performance degradation since the DTrace import, please update your copy of src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_kmem.c by either cvsup of direct edit to remove "#define KMEM_DEBUG". You only need to rebuild the opensolaris kernel module after this chan

Re: Unresponsive after dtrace

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:35:16AM -0500, Wes Morgan wrote: > I know this has been reported already, but I want to give a "me too". > After installing a new world and kernel from the tree yesterday afternoon, > I let my system run all night. This morning everything was extremely > sluggish and u

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade

2008-08-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/John (Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:35:38 +) * | It's supposed to, but I don't trust it. There is no substitute for | a rm -rf of the obj tree. That's also quicker. Ah, OK... | Sorry about the problems. Oh, no problem at all -- I learned a lot as a result. Just wanted to make sure I unde

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 07:32:14PM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote: > | or > | > | 2. Delete the obj tree before building anything new. > | > | > Is everything supposed to work out of box now? > | > | Yes, but an obj tree from a broken build will cause problems. > > That's a bit strange: > > 1. W

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade

2008-08-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/John (Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:36:36 +) * | If you still have the obj tree from the problem build, there are two things | you can do: | | 1. make STRIP= installworld Thank you -- that's good to know, for the future. For now, I updated again and using my saved "four cc tools kit" rebu

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:27:22AM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote: > Is there anything else I should have done to avoid these problems? If you still have the obj tree from the problem build, there are two things you can do: 1. make STRIP= installworld or 2. Delete the obj tree before building any

Re: unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 03:22:18PM -0700, John Scroggins wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 19:57 -0700, John Scroggins wrote: > > thanks John, > found the offending file dtrace.h -- lines 520 and 630 had the #if > BYTE_ORDER == _BIG_ENDIAN entries. That code is correct though. FreeBSD requires both

Re: Unresponsive after dtrace

2008-08-31 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:35:16AM -0500, Wes Morgan wrote: > I know this has been reported already, but I want to give a "me too". > After installing a new world and kernel from the tree yesterday afternoon, > I let my system run all night. This morning everything was extremely > sluggish and u

Re: unable to upgrade to 7.1-PRE

2008-08-31 Thread John Scroggins
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 19:57 -0700, John Scroggins wrote: thanks John, found the offending file dtrace.h -- lines 520 and 630 had the #if BYTE_ORDER == _BIG_ENDIAN entries. For good measure, I rm'd the whole ../../cddl directory and re-sup'd it. Build with no errors --smooth as glass ;) > On Sun,

Re: Unresponsive after dtrace

2008-08-31 Thread Yarema
Wes Morgan wrote: > I know this has been reported already, but I want to give a "me too". > After installing a new world and kernel from the tree yesterday > afternoon, I let my system run all night. This morning everything was > extremely sluggish and unresponsive. According to top, which I > than

Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade

2008-08-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
Still having problems... ,--- I/Alex (Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:42:00 -0400) * | ,--- You/Kostik (Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:04:32 +0300) * | | cd into /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1, | | make install DEBUG_FLAGS=-g | | That simple thing didn't work for me: | But I've found what may be an extremely

Unresponsive after dtrace

2008-08-31 Thread Wes Morgan
I know this has been reported already, but I want to give a "me too". After installing a new world and kernel from the tree yesterday afternoon, I let my system run all night. This morning everything was extremely sluggish and unresponsive. According to top, which I thankfully left running, pro

FYI: netatm garbage-collected

2008-08-31 Thread Robert Watson
This is an FYI rather than a HEADS UP, as it should make no functional difference (ideally). Per e-mail a couple of weeks ago, I have removed the uncompilable and unusable netatm code from the 7.x source tree. We are now down to two (2) ATM stacks in 7.x, both of which are MPSAFE and work, a

Re: Possible ZFS patch, please test!

2008-08-31 Thread Henri Hennebert
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being rea