On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:57:37PM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> 3. Improvements to the bug tracker. Personally I'd love to see
> something like Jira used [4] with all the sophistication of workflow,
> release notes, voting for bugs, etc, etc.
I have some notes for some prototyping ideas,
I'd also appreciate a little more frequent updating of the release
schedule, maybe with some terse "we're waiting on this ... " notes,
like there were for some past releases. I'd guess the amount of time
involved in doing so would be modest.
> * subversion. Without checking out the whole repositor
Hiho! :-)
I'm planning to buy a Promise TX4302. The idea is to just plug in some
disks via esata and then put zfs on them.
Anybody got some experience with the TX4302? Googling didn't really
turn up much, so I guess the controller "just works"? :-)
Greetings,
Marc
__
On Mon, December 8, 2008 5:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
> Which version are you currently using? My previous commit only fixes
> the excessive interrupt issue, I think this could be a different
> problem, I'm taking a look at the code to see if I can have something
> for you.
I was running on the versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Mon, December 8, 2008 4:29 am, Oleg Gorokhov wrote:
>> This patch committed fixes the issue reported earlier with interruptions
>> but there is one more problem discussed here:
>>
>> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Free
Ken Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:57 +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>> I've resisted sending this email for a while since I really don't want
>> to start a bikeshed nor a flame. However there comes a time to express
>> my thoughts over the lack of visibility of the release process f
On Mon, December 8, 2008 4:29 am, Oleg Gorokhov wrote:
> This patch committed fixes the issue reported earlier with interruptions
> but there is one more problem discussed here:
>
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2008-11/msg00144.html
>
> We also have observed similar bad be
On 2008-Dec-08 20:57:37 +1100, Aristedes Maniatis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* subversion. Without checking out the whole repository, it is a
>little hard to use this as a news source and emails to the commit list
>still look more like cvs than svn so it is a bit hard to see which
>branch co
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:57 +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> I've resisted sending this email for a while since I really don't want
> to start a bikeshed nor a flame. However there comes a time to express
> my thoughts over the lack of visibility of the release process for
> FreeBSD 7.1. He
Are these any good? Has anyone tried them with FreeBSD and/or bacula?
For small office, these look like where the price point is for backups...
cheers
BMS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-st
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 08:03 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Dec-05 07:34:21 -0500, "Brian A. Seklecki"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Well ... name a price for the development; HA L1/L2 is a feature the
> >community would gladly sponsor the development of.
>
> net/ifstated covers at least so
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 04/12/2008 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> I've just realized that I see in releng/7 something that I did not see
>> in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I
>> still get default loopback rules installed.
>> I think that this is not
on 04/12/2008 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> I've just realized that I see in releng/7 something that I did not see
> in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I
> still get default loopback rules installed.
> I think that this is not correct, I am using custom
System: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE r185725 amd64
Peculiarities: ZFS, GPART
There is 4GB of RAM and 4GB swap/dump partition. The partition is
typical swap partition only created via GPART.
minidumps are enabled.
I had a crash recently and here's a message from it:
Dec 6 10:23:17 odyssey kernel: Upt
I've resisted sending this email for a while since I really don't want
to start a bikeshed nor a flame. However there comes a time to express
my thoughts over the lack of visibility of the release process for
FreeBSD 7.1. Here are the resources I am aware of:
* release timeline [1]. This pa
This patch committed fixes the issue reported earlier with interruptions
but there is one more problem discussed here:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2008-11/msg00144.html
We also have observed similar bad behavior for network (especially
ssl-based) operations: imaps, s
I have rolled a port for ext2fuse:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar
I look forward to your feedback.
thanks,
BMS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
On 5. des.. 2008, at 20.59, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 08:11:02PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 4. des.. 2008, at 13.20, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 4. des.. 2008, at 13.07, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
Got it!
pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
