Re: Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

2009-01-20 Thread Mark Kirkwood
I wrote: I am getting this too - update from RELENG_7 @12 Jan src to 20 Jan and I have: panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x511d from /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:959 Can't work out which disk we are booting from. Guessed BIOS device 0x not found by probes, defaulting

Re: interrupt storm

2009-01-20 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:14:25AM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > >Dan Langille wrote: > >>Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > >>>Dan Langille wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm getting this: > > > >kernel: interrupt storm detected

Re: Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

2009-01-20 Thread John Rushford
Hello, Perhaps mine is a different issue but I ran into this today. I loaded FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE from a DVD onto an Apple Mac Pro after partitioning a drive with bootcamp. The install went quite well and the machine came up with no issues. I configured networking, X, and got gnome working. I s

Re: New BTX bootloader hangs my box

2009-01-20 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:25:23PM +0100, Ralf van der Enden wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently upgraded my box from FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE. > > Now, whenever I reboot my machine it hangs during the boot proces. > > I have a Fasttrak TX2 100 card in my system which is used for booting Fr

Re: switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread Wojciech Puchar
yes On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Eduardo Meyer wrote: Hello, I have a certain disk where da0s1a and da0s1d are inverted. By some reason someone labelled root as 'd' and home as 'a'. Can I just bsdlabel -n da0s1 > savedabel.txt Edit savedlabel.txt, switch and restore? (bsdlabel -R da0s1 savedlabel)

New BTX bootloader hangs my box

2009-01-20 Thread Ralf van der Enden
Hi, I've recently upgraded my box from FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE. Now, whenever I reboot my machine it hangs during the boot proces. I have a Fasttrak TX2 100 card in my system which is used for booting FreeBSD and it shows fine while it's searching for attached drives, but after it lo

Re: SYSV* mandatory for COMPAT_IA32 on amd64?

2009-01-20 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to pluknet: > To clarify: > I.e. on older versions you had no errors with COMPAT_IA32 and without SYSV* ? I think so. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr Dons / donation Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/

Re: switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:34PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:24:27PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > >> I have a certain disk where da0s1a and da0s1d are inverted. By some > >> reason someone

Re: interrupt storm

2009-01-20 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Dan Langille wrote: Please. btw, did you try to set hw.acpi.osname="Linux" in /boot/loader.conf? -- SY, Marat ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre

Re: switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:34PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > ... > > Why not simply use bsdlabel -e da0s1? > > Because I didnt know about that? ;-) > > Thank you for the hint. > > However I still have the same doubt. Since basically its the same > task, Is it safe do relabel this way? I hav

Re: switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread Eduardo Meyer
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:24:27PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> I have a certain disk where da0s1a and da0s1d are inverted. By some >> reason someone labelled root as 'd' and home as 'a'. >> >> Can I just >> >> bsdlabel -n da

Re: switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello, On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:24:27PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > I have a certain disk where da0s1a and da0s1d are inverted. By some > reason someone labelled root as 'd' and home as 'a'. > > Can I just > > bsdlabel -n da0s1 > savedabel.txt > > Edit savedlabel.txt, switch and restore? (b

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
On 20/01/2009, at 13:25, Steve Bertrand wrote: Also, it may help to run tcpdump without the 'host' parameter on em0 while the pinging is occurring to see if you can find out whether the ICMP replies are being sent out as the primary IP. stewie# tcpdump -n -i em0 icmp tcpdump: verbose output

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Wendell Martins Borges wrote: > >>> # tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181 >> ping for another host: >> >> stewie# tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181 >> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode >> listening on em0, link-type EN10MB (E

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
On 20/01/2009, at 13:22, Steve Bertrand wrote: So, the box can be found on the network, but it is not returning traffic properly. What does # arp -a have to say, on both boxes? stewie# arp -a stewie (192.168.112.1) at 00:15:17:16:bf:9a on em0 permanent [ethernet] cartola (192.168.112.181

switching bsdlabel's label

2009-01-20 Thread Eduardo Meyer
Hello, I have a certain disk where da0s1a and da0s1d are inverted. By some reason someone labelled root as 'd' and home as 'a'. Can I just bsdlabel -n da0s1 > savedabel.txt Edit savedlabel.txt, switch and restore? (bsdlabel -R da0s1 savedlabel) -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Wendell Martins Borges wrote: >> # tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181 > > ping for another host: > > stewie# tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181 > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > listening on em0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 byt

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
On 20/01/2009, at 12:26, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Can you try the following: ping -S 192.168.112.181 host and then try pinging 192.168.112.181 from the host? stewie# ping -S 192.168.112.181 192.168.112.8 PING 192.168.112.8 (192.168.112.8) from 192.168.112.181: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.16

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
On 20/01/2009, at 12:00, Steve Bertrand wrote: Wendell, what does #netstat -rn say? Also, if you run tcpdump listening on the alias IP address, do you see the ingress traffic from the remote workstations? ie: stewie# netstat -rn | grep 192.168.112.181 192.168.112.18100:15:17:16:bf:9a

Re: LSI SAS3442e supported in 6.4 or 7.1?

2009-01-20 Thread Barry Pederson
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello, seems like I cannot find out if this card is supported or not. LSI provide drivers for Windows and Linux as usual, and mfi(4) doesn't mention that particular one. But possibly it's of the "MegaRAID Firmware Interface" type that mfi(4) supports? Unfortunately for

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, all, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> For how long? On a 7.0-R box, it works ok with a /32 prefix len: >> >> %ifconfig >> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=9b >> ether 00:0f:b5:80:53:85 >> inet

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:12 -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote: > I had a 7.0 server and my card worked fine, upgraded to 7.1 and > aliases stopped working, below some information from my server. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD stewie.ramenzoni.com.br 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: > Thu Jan 1

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: > For how long? On a 7.0-R box, it works ok with a /32 prefix len: > > %ifconfig > re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 00:0f:b5:80:53:85 > inet 208.70.104.210 netmask 0xff00 bro

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello, On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12:45AM -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote: ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.168.112.181 netmask 255.255.255.255" I don't know if this can be the cause of your problem, but the

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12:45AM -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote: >> >>> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" >>> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.168.112.181 netmask 255.255.255.255" >> I don't know if this can

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12:45AM -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote: > >> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" >> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.168.112.181 netmask 255.255.255.255" > > I don't know if this can be the cause of your probl

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
On 20/01/2009, at 11:43, Steve Bertrand wrote: I'm confused. Given the /etc/rc.conf settings, the above ifconfig output appears to be exactly what I would expect. What is not working? Steve Hi Steve, The settings are really OK. However after the update does not can access the alias of I

Re: System borked: loader stack overflow.

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Lankford
I suppose that was what was required with XP (normally used boot0, but tinkered with using windows boot as an alternate method), but I haven't had to update boot1 since I first installed everything on this laptop ...so far. Andrew Lankford Bruce Simpson wrote: Andrew Lankford wrote: FYI:

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello, On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12:45AM -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote: > ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.168.112.181 netmask 255.255.255.255" I don't know if this can be the cause of your problem, but the /32 netmask for aliases has

Re: aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Steve Bertrand
Wendell Martins Borges wrote: > I had a 7.0 server and my card worked fine, upgraded to 7.1 and aliases > stopped working, below some information from my server. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD stewie.ramenzoni.com.br 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu > Jan 1 14:37:25 UTC 2009 > r...@logan.cse

aliases not working in em0

2009-01-20 Thread Wendell Martins Borges
I had a 7.0 server and my card worked fine, upgraded to 7.1 and aliases stopped working, below some information from my server. # uname -a FreeBSD stewie.ramenzoni.com.br 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 14:37:25 UTC 2009 r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/ usr/src/sys/GEN

Re: interrupt storm

2009-01-20 Thread Dan Langille
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Hi, I'm getting this: kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt source what is your motherboard

Re: SYSV* mandatory for COMPAT_IA32 on amd64?

2009-01-20 Thread pluknet
2009/1/20 Ollivier Robert : > I must have missed the HEADS-UP or something but it seems that the SYSV IPC > options are now mandatory in order to compile an amd64 kernel with > COMPAT_IA32... I get linking errors in kernel.debug because > freebsd32_syscalls.o is referencing the SYSV syscalls... >

LSI SAS3442e supported in 6.4 or 7.1?

2009-01-20 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello, seems like I cannot find out if this card is supported or not. LSI provide drivers for Windows and Linux as usual, and mfi(4) doesn't mention that particular one. But possibly it's of the "MegaRAID Firmware Interface" type that mfi(4) supports? Unfortunately for a particular server model t

Re: Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

2009-01-20 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Reuben wrote: I was wondering if anyone else was seeing loader (v1.02) break after updating from 7.1-RELEASE to 7.1-STABLE. After performing the prescribed updating procedure (via the handbook), the system will go through the normal steps and after the boot menu will present the following er

Re: problems with sata disks (taskqueue timeout)

2009-01-20 Thread Bartosz Stec
Marc UBM pisze: Hiho! :-) Occasionally, especially when uploading a large number of files, the (brand-new, tested) sata disks in my fileserver spit out some of these errors: --- Jan 19 19:51:14 hamstor kernel: ad10: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) L