I'm writing this more as a heads up to those using freebsd as a guest
under virtualpc 2007 on Win XP sp3 host.
I created a fixed size virtual disk (8gig). Just to be sure, I ran the
XP disk check on the underlying disk before hand. I then installed
freebsd 7.1 from cd image. Next I csup'ed to ge
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 06:03:54PM +, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
I guess that means, "We are not aware of issues with any combinations
of the features in the Subject: at this time. Please recompile your
kernel with debugging
>Ok, this patch should work on NV50 chips also.
>What you get is EXA and Xv.
>You still need:
>A recent -CURRENT or -STABLE.
>git master of libdrm and xf86-video-nouveau.
>This patch.
>Things I've figured out since the last patch...
>On NV50 class hardware you need to have a compositing mana
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 08:29:57PM +0100, barbara wrote:
>
> Any news about that?
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047527.html
>
I'm sorry, I forgot this issue which was caused by my disk crash
happened in the end of Jan, 2009.
I've updated age(4) patch in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=
FreeBSD-EN-09:01.kenv Errata Notice
The FreeBSD Project
Topic:
Hello.
New release was uploaded in my blog.
The command queuing improves especially sequential read
by MCS(multiple connections per session) round robin.
In my post, I uploaded the screen shots using CrystalDiskMark
which is one of popular benchmark in Japan.
You can download CrystalDiskMark(mul
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
>
> Nicolais wrote:
>> Also - this was extracted from kenv:
>>
>> smbios.system.maker="MICRO-STAR INTERANTIONAL CO.,LTD"
>> smbios.system.product="MS-7368"
>
> as I supposed in previous message your MB is MicroStar product. So I
> insist that you read thread [1] in fr
Any news about that?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047527.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsub
Scott Lambert wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:41:57PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
I have a previously stable machine, other than a one time panic in
soft-updates which I could never reproduce, running RELENG_7 from July
23, 2008.
Starting update: Wed Jul 23 01:29:47 CDT 2008
Finished update:
ff msi (via hw..pci.enable_msi=0) got it working again.
> > DB> I tried first replacing bge with an older version but that did not
> > help.
> >
> > It looks like related to this report:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1253844+1263253+/usr/lo
> I did this for 2-3 years and it has worked very well. Of course I took
> care of using the right priorities from the start. This setup has now
> been replaced by a ZFS mirror. The resilver time is just so much better :)
How do you find ZFS performance in an asymetric mirror, and does it
seem to
it working again.
> DB> I tried first replacing bge with an older version but that did not help.
>
> It looks like related to this report:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1253844+1263253+/usr/local/www/db/text/2009/freebsd-bugs/20090322.freebsd-bugs
>
Could
ot help.
It looks like related to this report:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1253844+1263253+/usr/local/www/db/text/2009/freebsd-bugs/20090322.freebsd-bugs
--
Mikolaj Golub
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
Pete French wrote:
I admit I was scepticle of this suggestion - but it actually seems to
have worked. COmpiling a straight GENERIC kernel with KDB and DDB
included do seem to have made my irq22 interrupt storms go away.
Certainly I have spent some time trying to provoke the problem and not
manage
Hi,
between March 16 and now, bge on a Sun X2200 stopped working,
turning off msi (via hw..pci.enable_msi=0) got it working again.
I tried first replacing bge with an older version but that did not help.
please advice :-)
Danny
___
freebsd-stab
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:41:57PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> I have a previously stable machine, other than a one time panic in
> soft-updates which I could never reproduce, running RELENG_7 from July
> 23, 2008.
>
> Starting update: Wed Jul 23 01:29:47 CDT 2008
> Finished update: Wed Jul 23 0
On Sat, 21.03.2009 at 08:44:42 -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> Even if you don't, I think it's quite useful to make the *default*
> priority set when creating a mirror be some value which allows both
> higher and lower values to be specified. I hadn't known about that
> issue until I read the or
17 matches
Mail list logo
