On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:53:12AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Jun-15 09:57:39 +0100, Pete French
> wrote:
> >In my expereince all the ones from the same manufacturer and model are
> >exactly the same size. Admittedly I only ever buy SCSI, but that
> >shouldnt make too much difference sh
On 2009-Jun-15 09:57:39 +0100, Pete French wrote:
>In my expereince all the ones from the same manufacturer and model are
>exactly the same size. Admittedly I only ever buy SCSI, but that
>shouldnt make too much difference should it ?
I have 3 Samsung HD103UJ disks and they have two different siz
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 11:03:34 am pluknet wrote:
> 2009/6/16 John Baldwin :
> As for allpcpu, I often see the picture, when one CPU runs the "irq17:
> bce1 aacu0" thread
> and another one runs arcconf. I wonder if that might be a source of
> bad locking or races, or..
> The arcconf utility uses i
on 16/06/2009 18:00 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 12/06/2009 23:54 Kip Macy said the following:
>> show sleepchain
>
> I can only do post-mortem using jhb's scripts for kgdb:
> (kgdb) sleepchain 2432
> thread 100263 (pid 2432, tcsh) non-lock sleep
I think that this was reported because t
2009/6/16 John Baldwin :
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 6:23:47 am pluknet wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> This is one of livelocks we have on a weekly basis.
>> Yes, we do still use ULE scheduler on 6.2 and not moved to 7 yet.
>> Any thought?
>>
>> db> ps
>> pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchan
on 12/06/2009 23:54 Kip Macy said the following:
> show sleepchain
I can only do post-mortem using jhb's scripts for kgdb:
(kgdb) sleepchain 2432
thread 100263 (pid 2432, tcsh) non-lock sleep
lockchain 2432
thread 100263 (pid 2432, tcsh) inhibited
Not sure if this correct though and what this m
Vlad Galu wrote:
...
Thanks, Ivan. I'll take a better look at this after our first release,
which is due in a couple of weeks. Right now the team efforts aren't
focused on portability, so it's a low priority issue, but something
we'd definitely like to have in the future.
I've just run head
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 6:23:47 am pluknet wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> This is one of livelocks we have on a weekly basis.
> Yes, we do still use ULE scheduler on 6.2 and not moved to 7 yet.
> Any thought?
>
> db> ps
> pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchancmd
> 70304 69700 69670 0 R
Hi all.
This is one of livelocks we have on a weekly basis.
Yes, we do still use ULE scheduler on 6.2 and not moved to 7 yet.
Any thought?
db> ps
pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchancmd
70304 69700 69670 0 R sh
70303 70292 93818 3572 RL CPU 2
