twa (3ware 9690SA) error on shutdown

2009-07-19 Thread Maxim Khitrov
I'm playing around with the 3ware 9690SA raid controller. At first, I was using FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2, but it kept encountering errors after start-up and on shutdown. There is no 8.x driver on the 3ware site, so I decided to go back to 7.2-RELEASE. This, however, did not solve the problem. The major

HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-19 Thread Ken Smith
First I want to apologize. This should have happened a bit sooner in our release cycle than now. To be honest I had slipped into We have symbol versioning for our libraries now mode. But only a few of the libraries currently have that turned on and I sorta forgot we still need to deal with all

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-19 Thread Ken Smith
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 20:26 +0200, Thomas Backman wrote: On Jul 19, 2009, at 20:16, Ken Smith wrote: The problem is that as of the next time you update a machine that had been running -current you are best off reinstalling all ports or other applications you have on the machine. When you

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-19 Thread Thomas Backman
On Jul 19, 2009, at 20:16, Ken Smith wrote: The problem is that as of the next time you update a machine that had been running -current you are best off reinstalling all ports or other applications you have on the machine. When you reboot after doing the update to the base system everything you

Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Romain Tartière
Hi! Simple test case: 8-- #!/bin/sh foo() { echo \$?=$? \$1=$1 } false foo $? 8-- % sh foo.sh $?=0 $1=1 % zsh foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 % bash foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 As you can see, the value of $? is « lost » when FreeBSD sh enters a function. Is this

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Glen Barber
2009/7/19 Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.org: Hi! Simple test case: 8-- #!/bin/sh foo() {  echo \$?=$? \$1=$1 } false foo $? 8-- % sh foo.sh $?=0 $1=1 % zsh foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 % bash foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 As you can see, the value of

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Romain Tartière
Hi Glen, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: % sh foo.sh % zsh foo.sh % bash foo.sh What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with '#!/usr/local/bin/zsh' ? This is not related to my problem since I am not running the script using ./foo.sh but directly using the

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:26:38PM +0200, Romain Tartière wrote: Hi! Simple test case: 8-- #!/bin/sh foo() { echo \$?=$? \$1=$1 } false foo $? 8-- % sh foo.sh $?=0 $1=1 % zsh foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 % bash foo.sh $?=1 $1=1 As you

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Glen Barber
2009/7/19 Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.org: Hi Glen, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: % sh foo.sh % zsh foo.sh % bash foo.sh What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with '#!/usr/local/bin/zsh' ? This is not related to my problem since I am not running the

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Romain Tartière
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: This has been fixed in 8.x: Cool, thanks! -- Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.orghttp://romain.blogreen.org/ pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024 F82A E748 D8E9 A33F FF56 FF43 (ID: 0xFF56FF43) (plain text =non-HTML= PGP/GPG

new umass panic on 7-stable built today

2009-07-19 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi! So I wanted to use an usb key on this freshly updated 7-stable box, and got a panic just after plugging it in: :( zsh triton# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.symbols /var/crash/vmcore.9 ... umass0: OCZ Technology ATV, class 0/0, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 2 on uhub5 umass0:1:0:-1: Attached to scbus1

Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.

2009-07-19 Thread Oliver Pinter
do you plan to MFC this fix? On 7/19/09, Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: This has been fixed in 8.x: Cool, thanks! -- Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.orghttp://romain.blogreen.org/ pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-19 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
Ken Smith kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu writes: First I want to apologize. This should have happened a bit sooner in our release cycle than now. To be honest I had slipped into We have symbol versioning for our libraries now mode. But only a few of the libraries currently have that turned on

Shell execution ( [was] Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.)

2009-07-19 Thread Glen Barber
Possibly off-topic... 2009/7/19 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com: 2009/7/19 Romain Tartière rom...@blogreen.org: Hi Glen, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: % sh foo.sh % zsh foo.sh % bash foo.sh What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with

Re: Shell execution ( [was] Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.)

2009-07-19 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com, Glen Barber writes: Possibly off-topic... 2009/7/19 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com: 2009/7/19 Romain Tarti=E8re rom...@blogreen.org: Hi Glen, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:

Re: Shell execution ( [was] Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.)

2009-07-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Mark Andrewsma...@isc.org wrote: In message 4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com, Glen Barber writes: Possibly off-topic... 2009/7/19 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com: 2009/7/19 Romain Tarti=E8re rom...@blogreen.org: Hi Glen,

Re: Shell execution ( [was] Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.)

2009-07-19 Thread Ian Smith
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Mark Andrews wrote: In message 4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com, Glen Barber writes: Possibly off-topic... [..] My understanding was this: If you specify 'sh foo.sh' at the shell, the script will be run in a /bin/sh shell,