dd 1m zero on the drive and rerun the 8.0Beta4 DVD. Created two slices S1 and
S2,
and did auto labling (unix partiton) on S1, hit W, the problem persists.
Boot system with freeBSD 6.4, and 6.4 sees two slices (MBR partitions) S1 and
S2,
but no any Unix partition (ad0s1a, ad0s1b etc) on S1.
Hello,
My server was using FreeBSD-7-Stable and performing
a mail server. Software I used is postfix 2.6.3
and dovecot 1.2.4.
The hardware is IBM blade server HS-21
CPU: dual Intel E5335 @ 2.00GHz
MEM: 3G
HD: onboard LSI RAID controller with 2 73G SAS HD.
(mpt0: LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter)
The
Hi!
I had the same problem with beta4:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-September/011470.html
and I tried this fix, and it did not solve the problem.
It might be related with the number of slices and partitions one
is creating ? I'll try this again today.
Tested
Hi!
I had the same problem with beta4:
[...]
My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning
worked.
I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using
the amd64 boot cd 8-)
It seems to be a bug with the amd64
On 2009-Sep-13 12:11:45 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net wrote:
I have configured the same mac on both cards.
This should be done automatically by lagg.
When I disconnect the cable from xl0, the network connection dies, and my
lagg0 looks like this:
lagg0:
Hello,
What might be the problem with that setup?
Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to
configure the switch to failover as well.
A simple LACP configuration should do?
mjb
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Hi,
* Kurt Jaeger li...@c0mplx.org [090915 09:34]:
I had the same problem with beta4:
[...]
My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning
worked.
I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using
the
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a where but its way too much to type accurately by
On 15 Sep 2009, at 10:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a
On 15 September 2009, at 01:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a
On 2009-Sep-15 09:50:49 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net wrote:
What might be the problem with that setup?
Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to
configure the switch to failover as well.
A simple LACP configuration should do?
Yes. I use LACP at
Le Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:57:16 +1000,
Graham Menhennitt gra...@menhennitt.com.au a écrit :
I'm upgrading a Soekris net5501 from FreeBSD 7-Stable to 8-Beta4 (via
source). I've done a buildworld, buildkernel, and installkernel. When
I try to boot the new kernel, it stops very early on in the boot
Kurt Jaeger writes:
I had the same problem with beta4:
[...]
My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and
partitioning worked.
It seems to be a bug with the amd64 code ?
That might be.
I
Jin Guojun writes:
I do not enve know how to make dangerously dedicated disk, and
the 8.0 may do this sliently.
I was told in private conversation dangerously dedicated mode
is currently broken (at least with regards to installation), and
that it was removed as an option between
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase the verbosity?
Hi.
Have I overlooked something, or is it not possible with newsyslog to run a
certain command after log rotation? :-(
It looks like the patch mentioned here
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2006-06/msg00575.html
never made it into the FreeBSD distribution?
Bummer ...
--
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:59:46 +0200, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz
wrote:
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some
problems with them, but the default output gives me no information
anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about
Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check
and see if it is feasible with the latest Release, or if I'm just going to
be spinning my wheels on this one.
The Objective.
==
I have a FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE system which I want to upgrade to 7.X
from the
Hi,
Reference:
From: Rom Albuquerque a_rom...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:38:16 +
Message-id: snt114-w81d034e5efd1695113d57ed...@phx.gbl
Rom Albuquerque wrote:
Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check
and see if it is
On 2009-09-15 16:37, Ronald Klop wrote:
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:24:37PM +1000, Dave Hardman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:40:52PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
Le Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:29:58 +1000, Dave Hardman
d...@hardman.name a écrit :
I upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0-BETA4. Now X will not receive
input from
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:38:16PM +, Rom Albuquerque wrote:
to halt. So, 4.9 is installed and working, is there a source level
backward compatibility issue between 7.x and anything older than 6.0 ?
In other words, upgrading from the sources with such an old
distribution is a doable task ?
23 matches
Mail list logo