> Here we can see detected: 4 (not 6!) SATA channels on AHCI controller,
> one PATA channel and 2 SATA channels in legacy emulation (why?).
It's "native" mode selected by BIOS setup as "default"
I hope, this diffs can be useful by some way:
===ahci -> "native"===
25c25
< real memory = 16092364
Hi,
I got 4 new SATA disks (WD Green, 1TB, WD10EADS) I want to use to replace
my old 250GB disks attached to my 3ware controller.
I want to reuse the old 250GB disks in some systems running old PATA disks
ight now as system drives. So what I did now was gathering SATA performance
tatistics with th
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Rohit Grover wrote:
I did have 'AllowEmptyInput "off"' in my xorg.conf previously.
Aha! I should have stressed that more. The mixed libraries were
an unrelated issue.
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd
On Monday 28 September 2009 02:21 pm, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Here we can see detected: 4 (not 6!) SATA channels on AHCI
> controller, one PATA channel and 2 SATA channels in legacy
> emulation (why?). Actually, the same happens if I comment out all
> that device class magic. Looks like the only t
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Rohit Grover wrote:
>>
>> I did a 'pkg_delete -a' to delete all packages, and then installed
>> fresh packages from the 8.0-RC1 DVD as necessary. I'm back to a useful
>> system and X11 isn't lagging anymore.
>>
>> I hope
In article <4ac0f173.10...@cs.rice.edu> you write:
>Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, now I can explain what is happening. The kernel is using 1GB
>>> pages to implement the direct map. Unfortunately, pmap_extract()
>>> doesn't know how to handle a 1GB p
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Serial console and remote debugging perhaps?
ILO is serial console or rather console++, since you can even see the
whole bootup sequence, change bios. But thats if you connect through their
webinterface
Just point me what other options I could try to g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
FYI, cross-posting to more than one list is discouraged.
J. Hellenthal wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:40 -, jhellenthal wrote:
>
>>
>> If you do not need to pgp/gpg sign email message to the lists please
>> don't.
I think a lot of people w
Rohit Grover wrote:
> I did a 'pkg_delete -a' to delete all packages, and then installed
> fresh packages from the 8.0-RC1 DVD as necessary. I'm back to a useful
> system and X11 isn't lagging anymore.
>
> I hope someone investigates why X11 didn't behave well right after
> updating the kernel/wo
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:51 +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 16:03, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:40 +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> >> 2009/9/29 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> >> > Marius Nu"nnerich wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Explicitly setting the root partition
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 16:03, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:40 +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>> 2009/9/29 Andrey V. Elsukov :
>> > Marius Nu"nnerich wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Explicitly setting the root partition
>> >> (vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/da0s1a") in /boot/loader.conf does
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:40 +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> > Marius Nu"nnerich wrote:
> >>
> >> Explicitly setting the root partition
> >> (vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/da0s1a") in /boot/loader.conf does not
> >> help either: Again, the system knows which partition
on 29/09/2009 09:58 Bjorn Hellqvist said the following:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, kama wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> on 28/09/2009 10:21 kama said the following:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/09/2009 12:04 kama said the following:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Rohit Grover wrote:
I did a 'pkg_delete -a' to delete all packages, and then installed
fresh packages from the 8.0-RC1 DVD as necessary. I'm back to a useful
system and X11 isn't lagging anymore.
I hope someone investigates why X11 didn't behave well right after
updating th
2009/9/29 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> Marius Nu"nnerich wrote:
>>
>> Explicitly setting the root partition
>> (vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/da0s1a") in /boot/loader.conf does not
>> help either: Again, the system knows which partition it should mount
>> to "/", but it fails to do so. (vfs.root.mountfrom.
On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Borja Marcos wrote:
I have observed a deadlock condition when using ZFS. We are making a
heavy usage of zfs send/zfs receive to keep a replica of a dataset
on a remote machine. It can be done at one minute intervals. Maybe
we're doing a somehow atypical usage
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 23:16 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:11:24AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:35 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > > >I also have a similar device, which I've been messing with
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:11:24AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:35 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > >I also have a similar device, which I've been messing with a bit the
> > > >last couple of days. In your case, it isn't seei
Oliver Lehmann writes:
> I noticed that even when I boot in multiuser, change fstab, then return
> into single user mode and remount / read-only, the label cannot be set.
> I need to boot directly into single user mode. Looks like writing the
> label is denied when the partition was once mounted r
Marius Nu"nnerich wrote:
Explicitly setting the root partition
(vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/da0s1a") in /boot/loader.conf does not
help either: Again, the system knows which partition it should mount
to "/", but it fails to do so. (vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw was set
too).
It's known problem
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:35 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > >I also have a similar device, which I've been messing with a bit the
> > >last couple of days. In your case, it isn't seeing the media, just
> > > the "drive". I've had to try various combinat
Hi all,
FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 was installed onto hard disk. The root filesystem was
transferred to a usb memory stick via
#pwd
/
# find -print . -x | cpio -pdm /mnt/usbstick
The fstab on the stick was modified such that "/" was to be mounted
from /dev/da0s1a, the ufs fs on the usb stick.
This had prove
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 07:29:46PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Rohit Grover wrote:
>> >
>> >On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Warren Block wrote:
>> >>On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Rohit Grover wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I have upgrade
On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Borja Marcos wrote:
Hello,
I have observed a deadlock condition when using ZFS. We are making a
heavy usage of zfs send/zfs receive to keep a replica of a dataset
on a remote machine. It can be done at one minute intervals. Maybe
we're doing a somehow atypi
Hello,
I have observed a deadlock condition when using ZFS. We are making a
heavy usage of zfs send/zfs receive to keep a replica of a dataset on
a remote machine. It can be done at one minute intervals. Maybe we're
doing a somehow atypical usage of ZFS, but, well, seems to be a great
so
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, kama wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > on 28/09/2009 10:21 kama said the following:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >
> > >> on 25/09/2009 12:04 kama said the following:
> > >>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, kama wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>
26 matches
Mail list logo
