On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:53:30 +
Tom Evans wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just installed 8.0-RC1 amd64 on a 6 gpt disk ZFS raidz1 (following the
> guide on the wiki), but
> have problems on reboot with the newly installed ZFS aware loader. The
> loader runs correctly,
> but incredibly slowly. It takes ab
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:45:43AM -0800, Norbert Papke wrote:
> On October 31, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > > On October 30, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:56:19PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> >
On October 31, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > On October 30, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:56:19PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > > > This occurred shortly after "scp"ing from a VirtualBox VM to the
>
On October 31, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > On October 30, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:56:19PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > > > This occurred shortly after "scp"ing from a VirtualBox VM to the
>
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Olaf Seibert wrote:
Although I think the patch does avoid sending the request on the
partially closed connection, it doesn't fix the "real problem",
so I don't know if it is worth testing?
Well, I tested it anyway, just in case. It seems to work fine for me, so
far.
Yes
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[..]
I have more strange issue with Lighttpd in jail on top of ZFS.
Lighttpd is serving static content (mp3 downloads thru flash player).
Is runs fine for relatively small number of parallel clients with
bandwidth about 30 Mbp
Ivan Voras wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[..]
I have more strange issue with Lighttpd in jail on top of ZFS.
Lighttpd is serving static content (mp3 downloads thru flash player).
Is runs fine for relatively small number of parallel clients with
bandwidth about 30 Mbps, but after some number
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
gnu...@alltel.blackberry.com wrote:
I can send in more documentation later but I am seeing severe zfs
performance issues with lighttpd. Same machine using UFS will push
1gbit or more but same content and traffic load can not hit 200mbit.
Ufs does around
Ivan Voras wrote:
gnu...@alltel.blackberry.com wrote:
I can send in more documentation later but I am seeing severe zfs
performance issues with lighttpd. Same machine using UFS will push
1gbit or more but same content and traffic load can not hit 200mbit.
Ufs does around 3 megabytes/sec IO at 80
On Sun 01 Nov 2009 at 17:17:15 -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Olaf Seibert wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks, it looks like it should do the trick. I can't try it before
> > monday, though.
> >
> Although I think the patch does avoid sending the request on the
> partially closed connectio
Hi all
I just installed 8.0-RC1 amd64 on a 6 gpt disk ZFS raidz1 (following the
guide on the wiki), but
have problems on reboot with the newly installed ZFS aware loader. The
loader runs correctly,
but incredibly slowly. It takes about 2 hours to get to the point where it
enumerates the BIOS
disks
gnu...@alltel.blackberry.com wrote:
I can send in more documentation later but I am seeing severe zfs performance issues with lighttpd. Same machine using UFS will push 1gbit or more but same content and traffic load can not hit 200mbit. Ufs does around 3 megabytes/sec IO at 800mbit network but zf
Hi,
I got the following panic when rebooting after a crash on 7.2-REL:
panic: solaris assert: dmu_read(os, smo->smo_object, offset, size,
entry_map) == 0 (0x5 == 0x0), file:
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa
ce_map.c, line: 341
This seems to be the same pan
13 matches
Mail list logo
