Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:30 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > Feedbacks are welcome as always. > Works here (ThinkPad X60): ahci0: port 0x18d0-0x18d7,0x18c4-0x18c7,0x18c8-0x18cf,0x18c0-0x18c3,0x18b0-0x18bf mem 0xee00-0xee4447ff irq 16 at device 31.2 on pci0 ahci0: [ITHREAD] ahci0: AHCI v1.10 w

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Tom Evans wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote: > > > > operator0, 164 Oct 21 15:34 > > > > /dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc > > > > > > Have you tried naming the GPT partitions an

7.2 dies in midnight run again

2009-11-19 Thread Randy Bush
i think the issue is how to tune for zfs i386 with 4G of RAM RELENG_7 cvsupped Nov 18 02:42 GMT panic: kmem_malloc(65536): kmem_map too small: 535019520 total allocated cpuid = 0 Uptime: 13h15m1s Physical memory: 3958 MB Dumping 637 MB: 622 606 590 574 558 542 526 510 494 478

Re: LRO support for cxgb in stable/7

2009-11-19 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:48:40AM -0800, Matthew Fleming wrote: > r193754 to stable/7 appears to have unintended code. The MFC note > indicates it is a backport of 190206, 190330, 192537, 192540, 192584 and > 192933. I looked over all of them and none have the offending snippet: > > #ifndef LRO

LRO support for cxgb in stable/7

2009-11-19 Thread Matthew Fleming
r193754 to stable/7 appears to have unintended code. The MFC note indicates it is a backport of 190206, 190330, 192537, 192540, 192584 and 192933. I looked over all of them and none have the offending snippet: #ifndef LRO_SUPPORTED #ifdef IFCAP_LRO #undef IFCAP_LRO #endif #define IFCAP_LRO 0x0 #

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:34:01AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:27 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: > >It's not. > > > >What does that do? > > From the man page, > > With flags encoded as: > 0x00010 device is potential system console > 0x00080 use this port for remote

Re: bug with some em nics on RELENG_7

2009-11-19 Thread Jack Vogel
Cool, so stable/7 will just need to be updated :) I need to catch up all the drivers in that stream actually. Thanks for testing!! Jack On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 07:29 PM 11/18/2009, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> Hey Mike, >> >> Can you check if you see the same behav

Re: Re: Re: [solved] Re: Re: Re: diskless - NFS root mount problem

2009-11-19 Thread Tim Judd
On 11/18/09, Mario Pavlov wrote: > oh yes, I got what you meant now > true, I used /usr from the server because I wanted to have all my ports > available to the client. Is there a nice way to install ports only in the > diskless distribution ? > > thank you. > > Regards > Mario Just like any oth

Re: bug with some em nics on RELENG_7

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 07:29 PM 11/18/2009, Jack Vogel wrote: Hey Mike, Can you check if you see the same behavior on RELENG 8? For RELENG_8. I installed an fxp card and netbooted off it. I assigned an IP address to the onboard nic (em5). Pinged itself, got a MAC and response. Plugged in the cable, pinged the o

Re: RELENG_7: Kernel Compile Failure

2009-11-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:34:10AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > ... > > > Try a different mirror, perhaps? I've had no problems tracking stable/7 > > > daily (though I'm using SVN). > > > > Thanks. Pulled a update from cvsup5.us.freebsd.org, and changes were > > picked up. > > > > Can someone c

Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters

2009-11-19 Thread Barry Pederson
Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:15:59 -0600 Barry Pederson wrote BP> If someone wanted to make PCIe compatible brackets for this affordable BP> card, they'd probably sell a fair number to small shops or home users. Yeah, I would also buy some. :-) I was browsing this bracket mf

FreeBSD 7.2, NFS, and Xen Cloud Platform

2009-11-19 Thread Vern Burke
Greetings all: I'm attempting to run my FreeBSD 7.2 server as an NFS backend for XCP. I can mount the share from any FreeBSD box, I can mount it from XCP's Linux command prompt, trying to mount it from XCP gives an error that the share couldn't be mounted because the server denied permission

Re: NSIS compile failed on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-19 Thread Tuomo Latto
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:18:02PM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote: >> Matt Wilks wrote: >>> I'm attempting to install NSIS (http://nsis.sourceforge.net/) on an >>> amd64 FreeBSD 7.2 system and having trouble. When I run >>> >> [snip] >> >> >From the project's home page: >> "NSIS

Re: RELENG_7: Kernel Compile Failure

2009-11-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday 15 November 2009 2:15:51 pm Larry Rosenman wrote: > > On Sun, November 15, 2009 1:10 pm, David Wolfskill wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:37:23PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> ... > >> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:698: error: 'struct cdevsw' has no member > >> named 'd_mmap2' >

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:27 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: It's not. What does that do? From the man page, With flags encoded as: 0x00010 device is potential system console 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging 0x00100 set RX FIFO trigger level to ``low'' (NS8250 onl

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Karl Denninger
Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:14 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: > > >> Mike Tancsa wrote: >> > At 09:00 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: >> >> Well ok then the uart driver is BROKEN. >> >> >> >> It simply locks up on the port after some period of time, returning >> >> nothing. I have found

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:14 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:00 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: >> Well ok then the uart driver is BROKEN. >> >> It simply locks up on the port after some period of time, returning >> nothing. I have found no way to reset the port other than a r

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Karl Denninger
Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:00 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: >> Well ok then the uart driver is BROKEN. >> >> It simply locks up on the port after some period of time, returning >> nothing. I have found no way to reset the port other than a reboot >> either. That's a "surprise" that peopl

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:00 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: Well ok then the uart driver is BROKEN. It simply locks up on the port after some period of time, returning nothing. I have found no way to reset the port other than a reboot either. That's a "surprise" that people running fax servers and other sim

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Karl Denninger
Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 08:53 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: > >> I will update as I have more information - this is a serious issue for >> anyone who needs working serial ports on multiport cards under FreeBSD >> for things like a fax server. this is not the sort of "surprise" one >> wan

Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:53 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: I will update as I have more information - this is a serious issue for anyone who needs working serial ports on multiport cards under FreeBSD for things like a fax server. this is not the sort of "surprise" one wants to see! Its not the puc per

V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up!

2009-11-19 Thread Karl Denninger
It appears that V8.x has changed some device names in the serial subsystem, moving them to the "puc" naming (e.g. ttydxx moves to ttyuxx) There is a fairly serious issue with Hylafax under the new setup that I have not (yet) been able to run down. It manifests as ports that simply stop working, w

Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/11/2009 10:22 Alexander Motin said the following: > Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >>> I didn't have this problem. System has AHCI in use, and the kernel is >>> built to make use of modular atacore. Specifically: >>> >>> # Modular ATA >>> device atacore #

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-11-19 Thread Marius Nünnerich
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:44, Tom Evans wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote: >> > >  operator    0, 164 Oct 21 15:34 >> > > /dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc >> > >> > Have you tried naming the GPT pa

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-11-19 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote: > > > operator0, 164 Oct 21 15:34 > > > /dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc > > > > Have you tried naming the GPT partitions and using /dev/gpt/* ? > > Nope, how would I do that

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote: > >  operator    0, 164 Oct 21 15:34 > > /dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc > > Have you tried naming the GPT partitions and using /dev/gpt/* ? Nope, how would I do that? I'd be surprised if it worked TBH.. -- Daniel O'Connor software an

Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Alexander Motin
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:22:53AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Read ahci(4) carefully. It has all possible references. If you think it >> is not enough, propose patches. > > I had no idea said details were in the ahci(4) man page, and I doubt the > rest of the user co

Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Alexander Motin
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > AHCI in the BIOS is enabled, AHCI in FreeBSD is in use. > > Kernel configuration is below my .sig, ditto with dmesg. World sources > are from ~45 minutes prior to kernel build date (2009/11/17 20:07 PST). > > FreeBSD icarus.home.lan 8.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-PRERELEASE

Re: boot issues

2009-11-19 Thread Randy Bush
>> i386, 7.2-stable from last summer >> >> cvsupped releng_7 >> made and installed kernel >> buildworld >> boot -s >> installworld >> mergemaster >> reboot >> >> hung after beastie, just as it did the other month >> >> booted -s >> mount -2 / >> /etc/rc.d/hostid start >> /etc/rc.d/zfs start >> l

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-11-19 Thread Marius Nünnerich
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 01:53, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>  > There's no need to detach anything. >> >> I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes. > > Unfortunately I get.. > > [midget 11:20] ~ >sudo zpool replace tank ad4p2 > gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-

Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:22:53AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >> I didn't have this problem. System has AHCI in use, and the kernel is > >> built to make use of modular atacore. Specifically: > >> > >> # Modular ATA > >> device a

Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters

2009-11-19 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:15:59 -0600 Barry Pederson wrote about Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters: BP> What I was questioning was where the OP said: "it fits into a standard BP> PCIe slot and works nicely there as far as I can tell" - which to me BP> sounds like you could use this HBA in

Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters

2009-11-19 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:35:56 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote about Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters: FC> > Hm, I don't know the recent exchange rate, but are you sure this is FC> > the same card? I paid something like 80,-€ (excl. VAT). FC> Oops, you're right, was reading the model numbers wr

Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters

2009-11-19 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:37:03 -0600 Barry Pederson wrote about Re: Support for SAS/SATA non-RAID adapters: > > I guess the version of the card I have here was actually intended to > > be used in some kind of special Supermirco-Extension Slot. However, > > it fits into a standard PCIe slot and work

Re: HEADS UP: major CAM ATA MFC

2009-11-19 Thread Alexander Motin
Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> I didn't have this problem. System has AHCI in use, and the kernel is >> built to make use of modular atacore. Specifically: >> >> # Modular ATA >> device atacore # Core ATA functionality >> device ataisa # ISA