On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:53:00 -0500
Steven Friedrich wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 09:23:57 pm Zane C.B. wrote:
> > With the GENERIC kernel on releng_8 and releng_8_0, I am having
> > issues with the Atheros wireless on my laptop.
> >
> > Upon boot I am getting the message below.
> >
> > a
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:40PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> Zane C.B. wrote:
> >With the GENERIC kernel on releng_8 and releng_8_0, I am having
> >issues with the Atheros wireless on my laptop.
> >
> >Upon boot I am getting the message below.
> >
> >ath0: irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3
> >ath0:
Thanks Yuri.
It solve my problem :)
Best Regards!
2009/12/22 Yuri Pankov :
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:52:14PM +0800, James Chang wrote:
>> Dears,
>>
>> Today, I use ctm upgrade my FreeBSD source code to "src-7 859"
>> When I try to make world, in make buildworld stage it show me "World
>> b
On Dec 21, 2009, at 10:37 PM, "Zane C.B." wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:32:40 -0500
Dan Langille wrote:
Zane C.B. wrote:
With the GENERIC kernel on releng_8 and releng_8_0, I am having
issues with the Atheros wireless on my laptop.
Upon boot I am getting the message below.
ath0: irq 17 a
I've been gradually testing 8.0 on several machines propr to deploying it
live, but I currently have a machine which appears to lock-up at 3am
every day. The symptoms are that the machine is still pingable, but doing
anything which requires access to the disc just freezes (so you cant login for
exa
On Monday 21 December 2009 9:23:47 pm Zane C. B. wrote:
> With the GENERIC kernel on releng_8 and releng_8_0, I am having
> issues with the Atheros wireless on my laptop.
>
> Upon boot I am getting the message below.
>
> ath0: irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3
> ath0: 0x1 bytes of rid 0x10 res 3
On 12/22/09 1:16 PM, Pete French wrote:
> I've been gradually testing 8.0 on several machines propr to deploying it
> live, but I currently have a machine which appears to lock-up at 3am
> every day. The symptoms are that the machine is still pingable, but doing
> anything which requires access to
> i'm trying to track down the same problem. The box in question has
> everything on UFS (mirrored ataraid) and a backup disk with ZFS on it
> attached to USB.
This is very interesting to know! It seems you have managed to get a lot
more information out of it than I have.
> As the box is remote w
on 22/12/2009 15:49 Florian Smeets said the following:
> Dec 20 03:03:22 XXX kernel: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0, please see
> tuning(7) and login.conf(5).
> Dec 20 03:03:53 XXX last message repeated 31 times
This seems to be superficially similar to infamous "fork bomb".
Would you be able to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:57:54 +0300
Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:51:04AM +0100, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > Hm so I guess there is no other way in determining the CPUs
> > temperature?
>
> Tried coretemp(4) yet?
And for those running AMD cpus there is amd
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Is the board you're using a i7-920 in a server-class board? If so, let
> me know the manufacturer, exact model/revision number, and the output
> from "kenv | grep smbios" and I'll see if I can wrangle details out of
> them.
Hm... it is not. It is a Desktop board - ASRock
On 12/22/09 3:19 PM, Pete French wrote:
>> As the box is remote with only ssh access, it's a little difficult to
>> debug this. During the weekend i waited till 3 o'clock with a top
>> running, and saw that hundreds/thousands of /bin/sh processes were
>> started. After that i commented out periodic
> Same here!
I am wondering what happens if I disable the automatic run,
then wait until 3am and run by hand... possibly its something
to do with the data it is having to work on at 3am ?
> But the box has been running 8-STABLE since around end of August, and
> the first time it happened was abou
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Pete French wrote:
> > Same here!
>
> I am wondering what happens if I disable the automatic run,
> then wait until 3am and run by hand... possibly its something
> to do with the data it is having to work on at 3am ?
>
> > But the box has been running 8-STABLE since around e
> Ehm... what happens if you just run daily by hand?
Nothingm ... that was the first thing I tried :(
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-un
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> People who collect ISO images from more than just the FreeBSD Project
> have been mentioning it would be nice if "FreeBSD" was part of the
> filenames for a while now. I just committed a change to head that will
> add "FreeBSD-" to the beginn
Hi!
Do you have any plans, when comming out REL_6.5 and REL_7.3?
On 12/21/09, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> People who collect ISO images from more than just the FreeBSD Project
> have been mentioning it would be nice if "FreeBSD" was part of the
> filenames for a while now. I just committed a change to
Interesting... I just got another hard lock on the system, not at 3am
this time. The only other common factor in this is that the lockup
is always preceeded by a flood of failed ssh logins. I;m sure we've
all seen these - I get them on every BSD system I have - they look
like this:
Dec 22 17:37:10
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 19:28 +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Do you have any plans, when comming out REL_6.5 and REL_7.3?
There are no plans for 6.5-RELEASE, 6.4-RELEASE was the last of the
official releases for the stable/6 branch.
We just started working out a schedule for 7.3-RELEASE, I should be
Squirrel wrote:
>most likely could be some kind of remote code execution or SQLi executed
>in the context of some php scripts, you should audit php code of your
>web interface and of the websites you host.
>also consider the strenght of your passwords, lots of login attempts to
>ssh/ftp may mean a
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:54 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith wrote:
> Why is it booting up at half speed? Same in your 7.2-STABLE dmesg.
I don't know. Since last time, I've upgraded the bios to the latest
(A03) and reset bios to default values - but the problem is still there.
According to the specs, a
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:21:45 + (GMT)
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Can you please reboot and show a verbose dmesg from this system?
Yes, it is there[1] now. :-)
> Also, how many CPUs does this system actually have? It appears that
> in the 7.2 dmesg at 2) above, two are detected but only one is
Hello
This is my 6 step check list to bullet proof your any Unix box and render it
unhackable by remote access.
1. Jail all services that will touch the open internet
2. Enable file and directory security such as using Tripwire or your distro
file integrity program
3. Disable any non used servi
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 06:41:30 pm Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:21:45 + (GMT)
>
> FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #6: Sun Oct 11 11:14:33 CEST 2009
> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz (1295.21-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9
>
> F
Hello have you looked to your /etc/rc.conf
set to the following by adding:
powerd_enable="YES"
power_flag'-i 85 -r 60 -p 100"
or
Now you can also modify this file: /etc/sysctl.conf or /boot/loader.conf
(CPU Frequency)
debug.cpufreq.lowest=600
To test live in your terminal you can set it with
i've got some problems with iwi in Freebsd 8.0, using GENERIC kernel
everything works just fine, compiling a custom kernel, just excluding
some modules i don't need, cause an interrupt storm to happen on irq11:
Dec 22 22:35:18 legend kernel: iwi0: mem
0xb0101000-0xb0101fff irq 10 at device 4.
Hi All
I wonder if anyone could help me with this problem. I followed the
instructions in the handbook to create some jails. It makes part of
the filesystem readonly which is good. Problem is though that I tried
installing syslog-ng in one of the jails and when I tried to start it,
I got this error
Hi Peter
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> Hi All
> I wonder if anyone could help me with this problem. I followed the
> instructions in the handbook to create some jails. It makes part of
> the filesystem readonly which is good.
This sounds like you used the "service jail"
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 08:34:09PM -0500, Peter Fraser wrote:
>
> instructions in the handbook to create some jails. It makes part of
> the filesystem readonly which is good. Problem is though that I tried
> installing syslog-ng in one of the jails and when I tried to start it,
> I got this error
>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Peter Fraser
> wrote:
> > Hi All
> > I wonder if anyone could help me with this problem. I followed the
> > instructions in the handbook to create some jails. It makes part of
> > the filesystem re
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:54 +1100 (EST)
> Ian Smith wrote:
>
> > Why is it booting up at half speed? Same in your 7.2-STABLE dmesg.
>
> I don't know. Since last time, I've upgraded the bios to the latest
> (A03) and reset bios to default
31 matches
Mail list logo
