On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> > Here's what I did:
> >
> > box1 COM1/ttyd0 -> box2 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
> > box1 COM2/ttyd1 -> box3 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
> >
> > On box1 I have
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and
>>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs b
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and
>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing it
>> from GPT to MBR partitioning
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hi,
> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and
> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing it
> from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I
> had done everythin
Well, I have good news and bad news.
I was able to get the kernel installed, reboot, and do a mergemaster -p.
When I went to do installworld, it failed on me. I tried to do buildworld
again, and get this:
cc -O2 -pipe -DNEED_SOLARIS_BOOLEAN
-I/usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/../../.
I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and
been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing it
from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I
had done everything right (or so I thought), the system would get
stuck at Loader and refuse
Please CC me on replies.
I'm running into issues with hard-coding some devices (see recent post
titled 'device.hints isn't setting what I want').
Associated with this issue is confusion over whether I want to use ch0
or pass1. I have these devices:
at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (ch0,pass1)
Folks,
[please CC me on replies]
First, see also my post: do I want ch0 or pass1?
I have an external tape library and an external tape drive. They are
not always powered up. My goal: always get the same devices regardless
of whether or not the tape library is powered on at boot.
After bootin
TB --- 2010-01-21 21:11:38 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-01-21 21:11:38 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-01-21 21:11:38 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-01-21 21:12:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-01-21 21:12:00 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2010-01-21 20:08:12 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-01-21 20:08:12 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-01-21 20:08:12 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-01-21 20:08:41 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-01-21 20:08:41 - /usr/
Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/1/21 Willem Jan Withagen :
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even
upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go.
Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE.
I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did no
On Thursday 21 January 2010 2:09:34 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 1/21/10 8:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:33:35 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
> >> On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> (kgdb) frame
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:34:07 +0100 Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM
Thanks!
> > generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback.
> >
> > What patch does:
> > - It un
On 1/21/10 8:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:33:35 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian Smeets wrote:
(kgdb) frame 8
#8 0xc05f8b28 in ip_forward (m=0xc23dc900, srcrt=0) at
/usr/src/sys/netinet/
On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:33:35 pm Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> >> On 1/21/10 2:01 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 21 January 2010 5:10:20 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> (kgdb) where
2010/1/21 Willem Jan Withagen :
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even
>> upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go.
>> Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE.
>>
>> I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did not wo
On 1/21/10 6:58 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian Smeets wrote:
On 1/21/10 2:01 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 5:10:20 am Florian Smeets wrote:
(kgdb) where
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
#1 0xc0525703 in boot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sy
On Thursday 21 January 2010 8:25:22 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 1/21/10 2:01 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 January 2010 5:10:20 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> >> (kgdb) where
> >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
> >> #1 0xc0525703 in boot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:4
I'm sorry, it's installkernel that fails.
I'll provide more details tonight when I get home from work.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/01/2010 19:16 Joshua Boyd said the following:
> > make buildkernel KERNCONF=CUSTOM fails on latest 8-STABLE.
> >
> > Here's the di
on 21/01/2010 19:16 Joshua Boyd said the following:
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=CUSTOM fails on latest 8-STABLE.
>
> Here's the diff between GENERIC and CUSTOM:
> $ diff GENERIC CUSTOM
> 323a324,343
>> # pf support
>> device mem
>> device pf
>> device pflog
>> device pfsync
>>
>> # altq support
>>
make buildkernel KERNCONF=CUSTOM fails on latest 8-STABLE.
Here's the diff between GENERIC and CUSTOM:
$ diff GENERIC CUSTOM
323a324,343
>
> # pf support
> device mem
> device pf
> device pflog
> device pfsync
>
> # altq support
> options ALTQ
> options ALTQ_CBQ
> options ALTQ_RED
> options ALTQ_R
Chaps,
On 10-01-20 Wed 1:04 pm, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:16:02PM +0600, Rabidinov M.A. wrote:
Does FreeBSD 8.0 support IPSec NAT-T in transport mode?
I want to create a L2TP/IPSec server. My VPN clients are NATed.
L2TP server (MPD5.x) makes tunnel, so I need working
On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Here's what I did:
>
> box1 COM1/ttyd0 -> box2 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
> box1 COM2/ttyd1 -> box3 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
>
> On box1 I have this in /etc/ttys:
>
> ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even
upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go.
Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE.
I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did not work either.
Only thing that is "extra" in the box
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:12:20 +0100
> From: 000.f...@quip.cz
> To: sp...@bway.net
> CC: freebsd-j...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: 32-bit jails on a 64-bit system?
>
>> The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include:
>>
On 1/21/10 2:01 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 5:10:20 am Florian Smeets wrote:
(kgdb) where
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
#1 0xc0525703 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418
#2 0xc052590e in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available.
) at /usr/src/s
On Thursday 21 January 2010 5:10:20 am Florian Smeets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this firewall has been running happily with a kernel from August 8th
> 2009 and has only been rebooted to upgrade world/kernel on Jan 12th
> 2010, after only 7 days of uptime i got the page fault further down.
>
> There are
On Thursday 21 January 2010 1:51:36 am Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I saw this little tidbit in the 8.0 Release Notes...
>
>
> The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include:
>
> Compatibility support which permits 32-bit jail binaries to be used on
> 64-bit systems to ma
Hi,
this firewall has been running happily with a kernel from August 8th
2009 and has only been rebooted to upgrade world/kernel on Jan 12th
2010, after only 7 days of uptime i got the page fault further down.
There are quite a few services on this firewall it has 4 physical
(sis(4)) interfa
Hello Jeremy,
Now I'm a little confused :)
I've made some tests with my machines and a couple of null modem cables, and
here's what I've got.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Using `cu' o
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
I saw this little tidbit in the 8.0 Release Notes...
The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include:
Compatibility support which permits 32-bit jail binaries to be used on
64-bit systems to manage jails has been added.
I know prior to 8.0 wit
31 matches
Mail list logo
