2010/1/28 Bruce Simpson b...@incunabulum.net:
Try GRUB4DOS. I use this so on boxes where I have Windows installed, I can
keep GRUB in the NTFS partition.
I haven't seen this issue and am tracking -STABLE on an ASUS V-series
machine.
Simpson,
I forgot to mention... but I tested it using
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:23 -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote:
GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use
EFI
to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:00:35AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
Is it advisable to patch 8.0-RELEASE kernel sources with the latest
(CURRENT) em driver (i.e., src/sys/dev/e1000)? It looks like there are some
updates to the driver since 8.0-RELEASE that may fix some problems?
While on the em
On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote:
John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue.
The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and
tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bootstrap code knows how to read the
GPT tables and can deal with 2 tb
on 27/01/2010 22:26 Tommi Lätti said the following:
Seems that the performance is indeed atrocious. I recently (like 2
days ago) had to rescue my zfs pool under opensolaris to spare disks.
The performance under OpenSol was what I was expecting, 70MB/s reading
and writing at the same time.
Thank you for your reply.
I put VBox-VNC-20100127.patch in files an modified the paths to be
acceptable to the ports tree and applied the Makefile patch and it
works well. (I say this as IMO it's easier to try if you distribute it
like that :)
I think too. I have created it to use with
On Thursday 28 January 2010 7:26:24 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote:
John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue.
The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and
tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The
I am investigating it, and have a suspicion about what's going on, you can
assist in verifying my suspicion. In if_em.c search for em_setup_vlan_hw,
you will find a compile time option that uses that only if FreeBSD_version
is 700029, hack the code however you wish so that it uses the OLD way
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Daisuke Aoyama wrote:
I think too. I have created it to use with FreeNAS. I assumed that it
is used internally.
The first mail of FreeBSD ML is here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2010-January/007
336.html Next time, I will try to change you said.
Cyrille Lefevre a écrit :
sorry, repost to -standards w/ an s !
jhell a écrit :
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:57, glen.j.barber@ wrote:
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat
Has anyone checked what POSIX has to say about this? And does this issue
affect more than just su?
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:45:10 +0200 Dan Naumov wrote:
This discussion made me have a look at my 2tb WD Green disks...
So did I. Hm, it's a nice feature:
-
Model Family: Western Digital RE2-GP family
Device Model: WDC WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0
Firmware Version: 02.01B01
User Capacity:1
Doug Barton a écrit :
Has anyone checked what POSIX has to say about this? And does this issue
affect more than just su?
Hi,
su isn't posix, not the susv4 way at least !
Regards,
Cyrille Lefevre
--
mailto:cyrille.lefevre-li...@laposte.net
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
