On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:12:01PM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kostik Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:41 PM
> > To: Matthew Fleming
> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: panic in vget()
> >
> > On Fri
> -Original Message-
> From: Kostik Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:41 PM
> To: Matthew Fleming
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: panic in vget()
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:23:17PM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> > I'm looking at thi
Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:58 (localtime):
No objection, I just wondered if it could somehow be involved in the
problem you are seeing.
What do you use that actually uses them?
I think fxp in the former times made use of ZERO_CPOY_SOCKETS. I also
have some private boxes arround with
No objection, I just wondered if it could somehow be involved in the problem
you are seeing.
What do you use that actually uses them?
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:53 (localtime):
>
> Why are
Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:53 (localtime):
Why are you using ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS? And is this LOR happening on STABLE or
> CURRENT?
It's RELENG_8.
I've alway been using ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS.
Some time ago, AFAIR, I read that this doesn't affect em at all.
Any objections using ZERO_COPY_SOC
Why are you using ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS? And is this LOR happening on STABLE or
CURRENT?
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:02 (localtime):
>
> Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adap
Jack Vogel schrieb am 16.04.2010 22:02 (localtime):
Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter, what is the
problem you are seeing?
I just did an MFC, would ask that you try that code, see if it changes
anything.
With latest MFCs I see em0:
but still this LOR:
login: lock
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:23:17PM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> I'm looking at this panic in vget() on stable/7:
>
> if (vp->v_iflag & VI_DOOMED && (flags & LK_RETRY) == 0)
> panic("vget: vn_lock failed to return ENOENT\n");
>
> It seems to me that this is not a correct ass
I'm looking at this panic in vget() on stable/7:
if (vp->v_iflag & VI_DOOMED && (flags & LK_RETRY) == 0)
panic("vget: vn_lock failed to return ENOENT\n");
It seems to me that this is not a correct assertion, because if the
caller passed in no lock flags (i.e. just checking
Glad things are better. On the Hartwell, the 0x10D3 adapter, what is the
problem you are seeing?
I just did an MFC, would ask that you try that code, see if it changes
anything.
Regards,
Jack
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> Brandon Go
Brandon Gooch schrieb am 16.04.2010 17:32 (localtime):
...
Thanks Jack! Your work is very appreciated.
It's extremely appreciated!
I tried another semi-productive system and since that hadn't exposed any
peculiarity I also upgraded one not too important productive machine.
All have onboard 82
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:22 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Friday 16 April 2010 5:37:59 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> > Jeremy Chadwick schrieb am 16.04.2010 11:28 (localtime):
>> > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schma
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:22 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 16 April 2010 5:37:59 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick schrieb am 16.04.2010 11:28 (localtime):
> > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > >> with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago I neve
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Giulio Ferro wrote:
On 16.04.2010 10:29, Sean wrote:
Yes, I have more than 16 groups, 22 actually...
Then there's nothing "wrong" per se, you're just hitting the fact that NFS
v2 and v3 only support 16 groups on the wire. That's just the way the
protocol is defined.
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Yes, I have more than 16 groups, 22 actually...
However I still think this might be a NFS problem, since when I login on
the server machine I can access that directory all right, the problem arises
only when I try to access that dir in the client mach
On Thursday 15 April 2010 8:06:02 pm Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:12:11PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > ?? ??$ /compat/i386/sbin/ifconfig
> > > ?? ??: flags=8843
> > > ?? ?? ?? ??inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 0xff
On Friday 16 April 2010 5:37:59 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick schrieb am 16.04.2010 11:28 (localtime):
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> >> with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago I never ran into the problem that my
> >> ssh connection stalled.
> >
Jeremy Chadwick schrieb am 16.04.2010 11:28 (localtime):
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago I never ran into the problem that my
ssh connection stalled.
With today's RELENG_8 it reproducably hangs at first login. After
some time I
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago I never ran into the problem that my
> ssh connection stalled.
> With today's RELENG_8 it reproducably hangs at first login. After
> some time I can open another ssh session which seems to stay wit
Hello,
with RELENG_8 from 6 weeks ago I never ran into the problem that my ssh
connection stalled.
With today's RELENG_8 it reproducably hangs at first login. After some
time I can open another ssh session which seems to stay without
problems, but the first sessions is always dying a few secon
> >
> > --QA3RSaXxDkY7tjDy
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:54:19PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > Take NFS out of the picture if you can...
> > > >=20
>
On 16.04.2010 10:29, Sean wrote:
Yes, I have more than 16 groups, 22 actually...
Then there's nothing "wrong" per se, you're just hitting the fact that NFS v2
and v3 only support 16 groups on the wire. That's just the way the protocol is defined.
Ops, I didn't know that...
Is th
On 16.04.2010 02:30, Rick Macklem wrote:
login as "giulio", but when I try to access that same dir on the
client machine
I get:
$ cd /path/to/root/dir/etc
(ok)
$ cd subdir2
subdir2/: Permission denied.
What happens is that I can access "subdir2" on the server machine when I
Yes, it should wor
>
> --QA3RSaXxDkY7tjDy
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:54:19PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >=20
> > > Take NFS out of the picture if you can...
> > >=20
> > I've been thinkin
24 matches
Mail list logo
