Re: net/mpd5, ppp, proxy-arp issues

2010-04-20 Thread Marin Atanasov
Hello Qing, Seems I've missed that thread, thank you for pointing it out. I was using csup to track RELEN_8_0 branch. Currently I'm syncing to RELENG_8. If I understood you right, after getting the sources for RELENG_8, I need to apply the patch and then rebuild world? Thanks and regards,

Re: net/mpd5, ppp, proxy-arp issues

2010-04-20 Thread Qing Li
I was using csup to track RELEN_8_0 branch. Currently I'm syncing to RELENG_8. If I understood you right, after getting the sources for RELENG_8, I need to apply the patch and then rebuild world? You only need to rebuild the kernel. -- Qing ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.3, reboot after panic: double fault

2010-04-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 2:53:16 am c0re wrote: Hello All! I've upgraded freebsd from 7.0 to 7.3 and all was good until I tryed to configure gre interface and use ipfw fwd. I'm actually does not know what was the point of failure in my configuration. [ some details snipped ] It worked

Re: FreeBSD 7.3, reboot after panic: double fault

2010-04-20 Thread pluknet
On 20 April 2010 15:48, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tuesday 20 April 2010 2:53:16 am c0re wrote: Hello All! I've upgraded freebsd from 7.0 to 7.3 and all was good until I tryed to configure gre interface and use ipfw fwd. I'm actually does not know what was the point of failure in

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-04-20 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote: On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. I'm still investigating

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-04-20 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with NO_CACHE=yes

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 17:53:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 17:53:40 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-04-20 17:53:40 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 17:54:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 17:54:06 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 18:45:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 18:45:19 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-04-20 18:45:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 18:45:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 18:45:40 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 19:09:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 19:09:50 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-04-20 19:09:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:13 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:18 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:18 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:18 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 19:10:37 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 20:03:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 20:03:53 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-04-20 20:03:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 20:04:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 20:04:09 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-04-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-20 20:23:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-20 20:23:53 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-04-20 20:23:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-20 20:24:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-20 20:24:08 -

/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot execute objects on /

2010-04-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
I have large storage partition (/vol0) mounted as noexec and nosuid. Then one directory from this partition is mounted by nullfs as exec and suid so anything on it can be executed. The directory contains full installation of jail. Jail is running fine, but some ports (PHP for example) cannot

Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot execute objects on /

2010-04-20 Thread Garrett Cooper
2010/4/20 Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz: I have large storage partition (/vol0) mounted as noexec and nosuid. Then one directory from this partition is mounted by nullfs as exec and suid so anything on it can be executed. The directory contains full installation of jail. Jail is running

Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot execute objects on /

2010-04-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Garrett Cooper wrote: 2010/4/20 Miroslav Lachman000.f...@quip.cz: I have large storage partition (/vol0) mounted as noexec and nosuid. Then one directory from this partition is mounted by nullfs as exec and suid so anything on it can be executed. The directory contains full installation of