Re: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?

2010-07-09 Thread Markus Gebert
Hi John Am 09.07.2010 um 22:03 schrieb John Baldwin: > On Friday, July 09, 2010 11:26:00 am Markus Gebert wrote: >> -- >> MCA: Bank 4, Status 0xb4430c2b >> MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x0007 >> MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x40f13, APIC ID 2 >> MCA: CPU 2 UNCO

Re: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?

2010-07-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, July 09, 2010 11:26:00 am Markus Gebert wrote: > -- > MCA: Bank 4, Status 0xb4430c2b > MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x0007 > MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x40f13, APIC ID 2 > MCA: CPU 2 UNCOR BUSLG Observer WR I/O > MCA: Address 0xfd Using my

Re: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?

2010-07-09 Thread Markus Gebert
Am 09.07.2010 um 17:56 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick: > Can you re-run this with "-lvc" instead? Thanks. Also "vmstat -i" > would be useful. That's all I can think of off the top of my head. Sure. # pciconf -lvc no...@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x058000 card=0x chip=0x005e10de rev=0xa3 hdr=0

Re: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?

2010-07-09 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:26:00PM +0200, Markus Gebert wrote: > # pciconf -lv Can you re-run this with "-lvc" instead? Thanks. Also "vmstat -i" would be useful. That's all I can think of off the top of my head. -- | Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com | | Paro

Re: sshd logging with key-only authentication

2010-07-09 Thread Glen Barber
On 7/8/10 11:13 PM, David Adam wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote: On 7/8/10 10:24 PM, David Adam wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote: What caught my interest is if I attempt to log in from a machine where I do not have my key or an incorrect key, I see nothing logged in au

Re: 8.x grudges

2010-07-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Jul-08 18:10:48 -0400, "Mikhail T." wrote: >08.07.2010 17:06, Peter Jeremy написав(ла): >> On 2010-Jul-07 14:22:22 -0400, "Mikhail T." >> wrote>>>1. A picture, that one of the systems was displaying at boot (and >>> then used as a screen-saver), stopped showing properly. The >