On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> >> I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
> >> regression of some
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
>
> Probably -
> http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
> says it should help unmodified gue
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > >> > On Sat,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:11:24AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> FWIW, Workstation 7.1 is fairly adamant about stating "if you want
> faster disk I/O, pre-allocate the disk space rather than let disk use
> grow dynamically". I've never tested this however.
Anecdotal, as I have no comparative pe
James,
I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE today and want use "make world" to
upgrade to 8.1-STABLE,
See the instructions on updating your system at the end of src/UPDATING,
specifically "To rebuild everything and install it on the current
system", and the Handbook.
--
-Andrew J. Caines- Unix Sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/08/09 08:55, James Chang wrote:
> install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc.a /usr/lib
> install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc_p.a /usr/lib
> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 -fschg -S libc.so.7 /lib
> install: rename: /lib/i...@dhuu
On 9 August 2010 18:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I thought Intel VT-d was supposed to help address things like this?
Probably - http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3/2-io/7-conclusion.htm
says it should help unmodified guests, but I don't know for sure. I do
know that Nehalems run faste
Dear Sir,
I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE today and want use "make world" to
upgrade to 8.1-STABLE,
But It show me the following ERROR messages :
=
FreeBSD81# make installworld
mkdir -p /tmp/install.pMB8TADB
progs=$(for prog in [ awk cap_mkdb cat chflags chmod ch
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:12:21PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> >> It's unlikely
On 9.8.2010 17:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> I'm going to try 7.3-RELEASE today, just to make sure that this isn't a
>> regression of some kind. It seems from reading other posts that this used to
>> wor
On 9 August 2010 16:55, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> >> It's unlikely they will help, but try:
>> >>
>> >> vfs.read_max=32
>> >>
>> >> for read
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 19:03, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> >> It's unlikely they will help, but try:
> >>
> >> vfs.read_max=32
> >>
> >> for read speeds (but test using the UFS file system, not as a ra
> Can you please remove use of the zpool entirely (e.g. zpool destroy
> tank) and do a write test to each disk itself? E.g.:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad8 bs=64k count=100
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad10 bs=64k count=100
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad12 bs=64k count=100
>
> Thanks.
z
15 matches
Mail list logo