[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:38:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:38:09 -

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:43:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:43:06 -

Apparent dnsbl bug in Sendmail or m4

2010-08-22 Thread John Nielsen
I'm migrating a sendmail server from FreeBSD 4.x to FreeBSD 8.x. After turning on the new server and feeding it some live e-mail, I noticed that the DNS blacklist lookups weren't actually rejecting e-mail like they did on the old server. (Actually the presence of blacklist information in the

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 06:15:46 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 06:15:46 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-08-22 06:15:46 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 06:16:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 06:16:20 -

Re: Apparent dnsbl bug in Sendmail or m4

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 22.08.2010 um 09:10 schrieb John Nielsen: FEATURE(dnsbl, `bl.spamcop.net', `550 Mail from ${client_addr} rejected, see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?; ${client_addr}') On the FreeBSD 4.x server, this is the corresponding section in the .cf file: # DNS based IP address spam list

Re: P811B Quad Port NIC problem.

2010-08-22 Thread Nikola Kalpazanov
Hi, I applied the patch provided by Pyun YongHyeon to the rl driver. Then put hint.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl0 hint.rl.1.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl1 hint.rl.3.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl3 and all 3 adapters are now working fine. I absolutely agree that Realtek makes low-end adapters. But in my case

Re: Apparent dnsbl bug in Sendmail or m4

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 22.08.2010 um 10:00 schrieb Stefan Bethke: FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `550 ${client_addr} foo ${client_addr} ')dnl The real culprit is the comma. I believe the problem stems from unquoted use of the arguments in some of the ifelses, where the comma turns the single argument

[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 09:26:07 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 09:26:07 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-08-22 09:26:07 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 09:26:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 09:26:46 -

[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 10:42:23 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 10:42:23 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-08-22 10:42:23 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 10:42:50 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 10:42:50 -

[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-08-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-08-22 11:22:42 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 11:22:42 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-08-22 11:22:43 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 11:23:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 11:23:07 -

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

2010-08-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:29:43 -0400 jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Also I just noticed another confusing message 'at least for me' that said starting first scrubbing (after reboot) of pool 'exports'. I read that like it is going to scrub the pool after the next reboot. I actually had to open up

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

2010-08-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:17:08 -0400 jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Hi Alexander, Attached is a fix for one problem and one slight overlook for 800.scrub-zfs. The first second change was probably just an oversight but none the less they both give a false impression of actions taken.

Re: [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-08-22 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 22/08/2010 15:16 FreeBSD Tinderbox said the following: [...] cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DFREEBSD_NAMECACHE -DBUILDING_ZFS -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -I/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/compat/opensolaris

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

2010-08-22 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:08:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:17:08 -0400 jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Hi Alexander, Attached is a fix for one problem and one slight overlook for 800.scrub-zfs. The first second change was probably just an oversight but

wpa_supplicant does not create pidfile

2010-08-22 Thread Dominic Fandrey
wpa_supplicant doesn't create the pidfile if the target directory does not exist. Because /var/run is wiped with every boot I added the following line to my rc.local to workaround this issue: /bin/mkdir -p /var/run/wpa_supplicant I'm running RELENG_8. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which

Re: Apparent dnsbl bug in Sendmail or m4

2010-08-22 Thread John Nielsen
On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 22.08.2010 um 10:00 schrieb Stefan Bethke: FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `550 ${client_addr} foo ${client_addr} ')dnl The real culprit is the comma. I believe the problem stems from unquoted use of the arguments in some of the

Build option survey for stable/8 r210741 (for nanobsd)

2010-08-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I have run the build option survey scripts[1] on stable/8 r210741 and have put the results here: http://phk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ This information is particularly useful if you are trying to shoehorn a NanoBSD image into a small-ish (ie: 1G by the looks of it) media. But

Re: P811B Quad Port NIC problem.

2010-08-22 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:28:34PM +0200, Nikola Kalpazanov wrote: Hi, I applied the patch provided by Pyun YongHyeon to the rl driver. Then put hint.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl0 hint.rl.1.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl1 hint.rl.3.prefer_iomap=0 # for rl3 and all 3 adapters are now working

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

2010-08-22 Thread jhell
On 08/22/2010 08:55, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:29:43 -0400 jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Also I just noticed another confusing message 'at least for me' that said starting first scrubbing (after reboot) of pool 'exports'. I read that like it is going to scrub the pool

Re: Build option survey for stable/8 r210741 (for nanobsd)

2010-08-22 Thread jhell
On 08/22/2010 17:23, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I have run the build option survey scripts[1] on stable/8 r210741 and have put the results here: http://phk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ Where is this at again ? ;) -- jhell,v ___

Re: Build option survey for stable/8 r210741 (for nanobsd)

2010-08-22 Thread Bruce Cran
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:23:48 + Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: http://phk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ Did you mean http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ ? -- Bruce Cran ___

kernel MCA messages

2010-08-22 Thread Dan Langille
What does this mean? kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813 kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0 kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory kernel: MCA: Address 0x7ff6b0 FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #1: Sun

Re: Apparent dnsbl bug in Sendmail or m4

2010-08-22 Thread John Nielsen
It was pointed out to me that the example in freebsd.mc has been double-quoted for some time. That's what I get for carrying old config files around for too long I suppose. Sorry for the noise and thanks again all for the prompt replies. On Aug 22, 2010, at 3:48 PM, John Nielsen

Re: kernel MCA messages

2010-08-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 23/08/2010, at 10:48, Dan Langille wrote: What does this mean? kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813 kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0 kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory

Re: kernel MCA messages

2010-08-22 Thread Dan Langille
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote: What does this mean? kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813 kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0 kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory kernel: MCA: